"instant" of the Big-Bang
- From: "Pmb" <peter102560_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 10:39:41 -0500
I'm reading the text "Principles of Physical Cosmology," Peebles, Princeton
University Press (1993). On page 6 Peebles writes
---------------------------------------------------------
If there is an instant, at a "big bang," when our universe started
expanding, it is not in the cosmology as now accepted, because no one has
thought of a way to adduce objective physical evidence that such an event
really happened.
---------------------------------------------------------
Does anyone agree with this either in part or in whole?
Best regards
Pete
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- From: xxein
- Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- From: Barry
- Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- Prev by Date: Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
- Next by Date: Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
- Previous by thread: Relation between electron movement and power factor
- Next by thread: Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- Index(es):