The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN

The differences between the Newtonian and the
Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN respectively.


Vlcek contra NEWTON
Let's have a real coordinates system firmly connected with a real
laboratory
on Earth, where all experiments testing the physical theories are
performed.
We know that this coordinates system moves around the Earth axis during
an
astronomical day i. e. it performs a quasi-circular motion. During the
year
it rotates around the Sun approximately in a quasi-circle together with
the
Earth. During 2.108 years it circulates in the quasi-circle around the
center of the Galaxy. It performs a quasi-uniform motion in a
quasi-circle
together with the Sun. The Galaxy performs a quasi-uniform and
quasi-circle
motion around the center within the framework of metagalaxies of star
clusters and our laboratory coordinates system on Earth together with
it,
etc. From the experimental testing of the law of inertia it is known
that
the body moves along the "plane" stated by a waterlevel, i. e. in fact
it is
not a straight-line uniform motion, but it is the motion in the circle
of
the Earth radius of R=6378 km. The space aeronautics show that space
ships,
Earth satellites and orbital laboratories move quasi-uniformly in
almost a
circle around the Earth.
The atomic theory shows that the electrons and the nucleus circulate
around
the center of gravity of atom in approximate circles. The body rotating

around its own axis (a flywheel) persists in this status. Similarly,
the
planets, stars, galaxies, molecules, nuclei and elementary particles
rotate
around their own axes. Since the uniform straight-line inertial motion
cannot be achieved in a microworld, its place here is exclusively in
the
inertial quasi-circle motion. It is analogous in the macroworld. Each
real
"straight-line" motion can be replaced by a circle of a huge radius.
This
discussion results in the following: "Every mass (atom, molecule,
particle,
body, vacuum) persists in the status of the quasi-rest or quasi-uniform

motion in a quasi-circle as far as it the external forces do not force
it to
change its status. (This notion is called the generalized law of
inertia)."
The inertial rotation of body consists of a quasi-uniform motion (in
the
quasi circles) of body's atoms. The inertial rotation of particle
consists
of a quasi-uniform motion (in the quasi-circles of subparticles -
quarks,
prequarks.
Finally, it is necessary to stress, that since the idea of inertial
straight-line uniform motion has no place in physics, neither the idea
of
the inertial system (in our theory it is replaced by the notion of
equivalent system-see 1.2.4.) nor the notions of Einstein's principle
of
relativity, local time, co-variant equations, nor Lorent'z
transformation
equations physical definition of simultaneity, nor invariant interval
has
any place in physics.
No real motion can be straight-line one. Every motion drawing near the
straight-line one is just a part of curvilinear circular motion with
final
radius. It will never reach the radius .
We have already known that straight-line motion does not really exist,
it is
only possible a hypothetical approximation for large radii of
curvature. On
surface of Earth, the circle with radius is a "straight line" (in light
of
the origin of this term at Newton - laboratory desk - a plane defined
by the
level).
These radii of curvature are even larger for galaxies - they have the
size
of several light years - and they are more similar to the straight
line,
which they will never reach. In reality we have not uniform motion in a

circle, but a non-uniform in ellipse (quasi-uniform motion in a
quasi-circle) or rosette respectively-see Consequences 2, point 20.
Centripetal acceleration forces in the author?s theory are not constant
-
they change: alternatively it is growing and declining. In a "circle"
can be
uniform or a non-uniform motion.
The non-uniform motion has a sequel: a little deformed circle on
ellipse or
rosette respectively and creation of stationary cloud.
Centripetal acceleration is not the acceleration in direction of the
curve
of the circle (tangential one), but in direction perpendicular to this
curve, it has nothing in common with the acceleration in direction of
curve.
It determines the size of curvature of circle line only, and in the
extreme
case, the size of the straight line (for ). However, it is not possible
to
realize these extreme positions in reality. For any "straight-line"
motion
it is valid that . On the surface of the Earth, on an ideal plane
determined
by the water level, normal acceleration on the "straight line", that
lies in
this plane, equals
The standard Newtonian physics is somewhat corrected by Generalized Law
of
Inertia.
Vlcek contra EINSTEIN
Einstein made a serious mistake taking the Galilei's principle of
relativity, valid only for velocities v<<c, c - velocity of light, as
the
basis of the special (and general) theory of relativity. He excluded
the
Galileian system of coordinates and preserved the validity of law of
inertia. He also generalized its validity for systems moving at
velocity .
Einstein has written: "Prominent theoretical physicists were therefore
more
inclined to reject the principle of relativity, in spite of the fact
that no
empirical data had been found as contradictory to this principle." -
RELATIVITY, THE SPECIAL AND THE GENERAL THEORY BY A. EINSTEIN,
AUTHORIZED
TRANSLATION BY ROBERT W. LANSON, FOURTH EDITION, LONDON 1921. We will
show
the empirical data contradictory to Einstein's principles of
relativity.
In this juncture the question of validity of the idea of space-and-time

frame has become ready to be discussed. The answer to the question may
be
negative. Nevertheless, there are two general facts, initially
favorable to
the validity of the idea of space-and-time frame.
They are:
A. The form of the interference field
B. The form of the intensity of the moving charge
In part 2 we will show, that the form of the interference field of the
moving medium is not-linear (it remains to prove by the metrologers
that the
interference field is also non-linear for the medium at rest).
We will also show, that the form of intensity of the moving charge is
asymmetric.
Einstein made a major mistake. The author proves it in revaluation
Kaufmann'
s, Fizeau's and Harres's experiments in light of the new theory
(intensity
of moving charge, non-linear form of the interference field, etc.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­-

----
1.1.1. Einstein's closed vicious circle
Einstein's two axioms:
a) law of propagation of light in all inertial frames
b) laws of physics (i. e. the law of propagation of light), identical
in all
inertial frames, mean that the light is propagated in all inertial
frames at
the speed of c. We can agree with this affirmation only in line with
the
closed coordinates system, with different media firmly connected with
the
frames (i. e. their coordinate axes). Otherwise, if we have the
coordinate
axes (skeletons) of inertial frames with a common medium, then is only
one
frame (skeleton - x, y, z axes) firmly connected to the medium.
Although the
light is propagated at the speed of c, with regard to other inertial
frames,
it is not true! In all inertial frames not firmly connected to the
medium
with regard to the frames (skeletons - x, y, z, axes only) the light
does
not propagate at the speed c, nevertheless the light cannot propagate
in
empty inertial frames (skeletons x, y, z)!
According to Einstein, the expression of vacuum (emptiness) indents to
be
apparently the unitive medium. That is again not correct.
Nevertheless, the vacuum consists of elementary particles, which also
persist in a certain motion. It means that it is possible to connect
firmly
with a given vacuum the only one frame, which "moves at the speed of v
= 0"
with regard to the vacuum (medium). It is evident, that it is possible
to
create the vacuum laboratories on various planets. In all of them, the
light
is propagated at speed c. But with regard to different inertial frames
of
planets the speed is different. There are different vacuums, which move
at
different speed. Einstein had to shelter himself behind the law of
propagation of light "at all times" so that both Einstein's axioms
could be
"valid" simultaneously.
Einstein corrected the real difference of light speeds in different
inertial
frames (skeletons) by "different times" in a fictitious "SPACE-TIME".
He
helped himself with a mixture of "space-time" mathematically expressed
by
the Lorentz transformation equations. Then he helped himself with other
new
expressions, that rescue what is not possible to rescue, whereby those
notions represent the following closed vicious circle:
Lorentz transformation equations
local time
covariant equations
physical definition of simultaneity
invariant interval
Lorentz transformation equations
We have shown that the idea of space-time frames is entirely wrong. All

notions in the closed vicious circle, including "mean proper lifetime
of
particle" calculated on the basis of the Einstein's theory of
relativity
which was not measured experimentally in fact are absolutely wrong.
Physics
is overflown by such anabashed points. It is necessary to clean the
physics.
It is necessary to strictly distinguish the measured values of the
particles
lifetime from the so called proper (shorter) Einstein's doubtful
particle
lifetimes, which takes into consideration velocity and shortens the
real
lifetime to the shorter fictitious (incorrect) proper lifetime, shown
in the
tables. The table proper lifetimes of particles have to be removed from
the
physical literature and be replaced by the measured real lifetimes
simultaneously with the measured velocities of elementary particles.
The
incorrect notions of Einstein's closed vicious circle lead to logical
assumptions for the incorrect notions in physics such as different
times in
different frames, length contraction, energy-momentum tensor, paradox
of
twins, clock paradox, equivalence of mass and energy etc. That's why it
is
necessary to remove this chaos from physics and to bring the results of

classical experiments in the right proportion (the place they belong
to).
It is not possible to reject Einstein's theory of relativity by one or
by a
few experiments. It is necessary to start from vicious circle... The
combination of the time "coordinate" with space coordinates into
space-time
and vicious circle originating from this is a big mathematical mistake.

This is deception of physicists including Einstein.

Allowe me to inform you on new address
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz
is my book : NEW TRENDS IN PHYSICS absolutely free.
L.Vlcek

.

Relevant Pages
Loading