Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 00:16:34 GMT
"Pmb" <peter102560_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Demdndls_qZS0BDYnZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| I'm reading the text "Principles of Physical Cosmology," Peebles, Princeton
| University Press (1993). On page 6 Peebles writes
|
| ---------------------------------------------------------
| If there is an instant, at a "big bang," when our universe started
| expanding, it is not in the cosmology as now accepted, because no one has
| thought of a way to adduce objective physical evidence that such an event
| really happened.
| ---------------------------------------------------------
|
| Does anyone agree with this either in part or in whole?
Do you believe in virgin born babies, fuckhead?
.
- References:
- "instant" of the Big-Bang
- From: Pmb
- "instant" of the Big-Bang
- Prev by Date: Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
- Next by Date: Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- Previous by thread: Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- Next by thread: Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- Index(es):