Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity


Paradise_@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Paradise_@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Paradise_@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Paradise_@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Paradise_@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Paradise_@xxxxxxxx wrote:

For those whom do not understand what I mean when I say that objects
appear smaller as relative distance between an object and an observer
increases, I mean that if one holds up a ruler or meter stick and
measures the length of a distant object, with one eye (focused upon the
distant object, the object will measure smaller than when it is closer.
And when I say that all matter in the universe is expanding, I mean all
matter is expanding over time (of course). I believe this is due to a
change in the precessional frequency of charged particles and therefore
a change in the spacing as well as size of the particles. I believe the
spacing between the particles to be a result of magneto-striction,
which is itself a result of the precession of the charged particles.


Furthermore, I believe that there is also a decrease in the electrical
"charge", or electric force, of charged particles underlying the
expansion of atoms (or matter)...in addition to the decrease of
precessional frequency and resulting magneto-striction. If the
electrical force of electrons and protons were to increase, the size of
atoms would appear to become smaller sinse the electro-motive or
Coulomb force between the electrons and protons would increase and
electrons would orbit more closely to protons. Since electrical charges
are "singularities" which are "infinite" in size, the size of the
particle does not actually change as it's electric force decreases. I
believe that such a decrease in the electrical force is caused by the
decrease in the precessional frequency of virtual particles because the
(collective) precession of the alligned virtual particles comprising an
electron (or other electrical charge) is what creates the spin or
charge of an electron (for example). This decrease of potential
difference is ultimately the result of equilibriation, as the charges
themselves progressively approach the neutrality of the ground state.

Alternatively, rather than a progressive decrease in the electrical
force of charged particles, there may actually be a progressive
INCREASE of the electrical force over time. If the electrical force
decreased over time, then the light reflected from distant objects
would appear to have more energy than closer objects (when illuminated
by the same light source). This may seem to violate the laws of
thermodynamics, yet one must remember that reverse-time (or
negentropic) physics are involved. I must confess that I am still
working out all of the mechanics involved. I suspect that I have much
work ahead of me. Yet, I remain confident that the physics involved
will prove to cohere with and perhaps even explain existing facts. I
can already see that this model will require one to fully embrace the
De Broglie model of the atom as a spherical wave as opposed to an
assemblage of electrons and protons. Although the Bohr model of the
atom remains a useful model (for describing certain functions and
attributes), it is not an accurate representation of an atom's actual
structure. Especially where condensates such as the neutronium
condendsates I have described are concerned, where all of the
neutronium particles have merged into a single "particle" of extreme
mass/energy density. It is important to properly understand the
mechanics involved in such a condensation of neutronium if one is to
understand the concepts of the expansion of matter and the universe as
well as a progressive increase of electrical force over time. As I
obtain insights into an understanding of the mechanics, I will share
them here, for those whom are interested. Those whom are not interested
need not pay any attention.

Although I believe the electrical force of charged particles to
increase as time progresses, I believe the precessional frequency of
the charged particles decreases as time progresses. This agrees with
many facts, such as the precession frequency of the nucleus decreases
as the positive electrical charge of the nucleus increases, as a result
of a greater number of protons (to use the Bohr model of the atom).


I should explain that I do not believe the precessional frequency is
actually due to a precession of electrons or positrons/protons. Rather,
I believe that the precessional frequency is due to the precession of
the (De Broglie) atom or one of it's axis of spin (it seems to me that
it is possible for an atom to have more than one axis of spin, as in
the case of pulsars).


To be clear, I should say I believe that the precessional frequency is
due to the precession of one (of the (De Broglie) atom's axis of spin.


Or, rather, I believe that the precessional frequency is due to the
precession of at least one of the (De Broglie) atom's axis of spin.

Of course, one must ask what the De Broglie wave is comprised of. I
believe the De Broglie wave is comprised of "Aether". In other words, I
believe the De Brogle waves are comprised of neutronium condensate.
Thus, atoms are comprised of an Aethereal neutronium condensate. And
neutronium particles, which are essentially quantum scale atoms, are
themselves comprised of smaller neutronium particles, ad infintum. Such
a structure offers the potential to unite the Bohr model of the atom
with the De Broglie model: an atom comprised of aethereal (neutronium)
particles which are capable of endowing the atom with charge (through a
polarisation of the neutronium particle's phase angle). Such a model is
essentially equivalent to the QED model of the atom, which ultimately
regards the atom as a structure comprised of (polarised) virtual
particles, since a neutronium particle is equivalent to a virtual
paticle pair (a virtual electron and a virtual positron/proton).

In my model, charge is the result of the angular momentum of
constituent particles: An atom accquires an "electron" (or "electrons")
when the atom's angular momentum (as measured by it's precessional
frequency) is transferred to one or more of the constituent neutronium
particles; or, alternatively, an "electron" exists (in a conventional
atom or as a free "electron") when neutronium particle(s) themselves
accquire a negative charge as a result of their angular momentum
transferring to the underlying neutronium particles (or vice verse,
wherein the underlying neutronium particles transfer angular momentum
to the neutronium particle which they comprise)...explaining why the
precessional frequency of an atom or neutronium particle changes as the
charge changes.

I believe that precessional frequency decreases as charge increases,
regardless of whether the charge is positive or negative. In other
words, precessional frequency is at minimum when the atom is neutral.
As an alternative, precessional frequency may also change according to
one of the following two possibilities:

1) The precessional frequency increases as charge becomes increasingly
negative; and the precessional frequency decreases as charge becomes
increasingly positive.

2) The precessional frequency decreases as charge becomes increasingly
negative; and the precessional frequency increases as the charge
becomes increasingly positive.

I am still working out the mechanics, and so I remain undecided about
which of the 3 alternatives is correct. I will share my conclusion
after contemplating the subject in further detail.


Perhaps I should explain that I believe an atom is actually a
microscopic black hole and that the nucleus is simply a CP (or Perhaps
CPT) inverted "image" of the electrons. Of course, "electrons" and
"positrons" or "protons" are actually De Broglie waves (or "wavicles").
This is true for virtual particle pairs as well.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
    ... a change in the spacing as well as size of the particles. ... "charge", or electric force, of charged particles underlying the ... precessional frequency and resulting magneto-striction. ... Coulomb force between the electrons and protons would increase and ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: experimental verification of electromagnetic mass
    ... a massless chargeless photon move charged particles? ... >of electrons and positrons that form the shell around the positron. ... That is approximately 2/3rds of the lepton charge has gone ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Are Gravitational Waves Electromagnetic waves?
    ... the increase in charge would also be undetectable. ... >> entire universe would be massive. ... the electrons, there is no predetermined form for these movements of ... >> acting as particles. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
    ... a change in the spacing as well as size of the particles. ... which is itself a result of the precession of the charged particles. ... precessional frequency and resulting magneto-striction. ... Coulomb force between the electrons and protons would increase and ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
    ... a change in the spacing as well as size of the particles. ... which is itself a result of the precession of the charged particles. ... precessional frequency and resulting magneto-striction. ... Coulomb force between the electrons and protons would increase and ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)