Re: Is this serious?
- From: "Pmb" <peter102560_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:20:55 -0500
<karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1167435860.166574.8740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is great to correspond with the author.
It is also great to discuss the topic with someone who has read my paper. :)
Here is my feedback:
-your references on Einstein stop at 1921 (1917 in reality, if we
cosider only published papers), he continued to work on the issue long
after 1921
-what about his writings after 1921, there is no mention about that
As I recall, there was nothing after 1921 which I found to be significant
and different than before 1921. If there had been then I would have included
them, especially had they been different then the conclusion I reached. In
fact if there was a conclusion made my him after 1921 which was different
than before 1921 then I most likely wouldn't have written this paper.
-no mention about his taking position against treating gravitattion as
a result of space-time curvature, ...
I did speak of this in the paper. In fact it was a major point in the paper.
... isn't this the title of your paper?
Yes.
it is precisely this information that appears to be missing from your
paper (or maybe I overlooked it?)
Yes. It could be that you've over looked it. It is very hard to tell how a
person gets an idea.
Pete
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this serious?
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Is this serious?
- References:
- Is this serious?
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Is this serious?
- From: pmb
- Re: Is this serious?
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Is this serious?
- From: pmb
- Re: Is this serious?
- From: karandash2000
- Is this serious?
- Prev by Date: Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
- Next by Date: Re: Is this serious?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is this serious?
- Next by thread: Re: Is this serious?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
