Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
- From: "Juan R." <juanrgonzaleza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Dec 2006 11:26:14 -0800
Eric Gisse ha escrito:
Juan R. wrote:
It is well-known the role that classical Schwarzschild solution play in
the classical tests of GR as Mercury perihelion anomaly.
Recently i was thought that solution is a sheer imposibility because
the Schw solution requires at the same time
T_1{}^1 = T_0{}^0
AND
T_0{}^0 as the only non-zero component of T_a{}^b
The Schwarzschild solution is the *vacuum* solution where T_ab = 0. All
the components of T should be zero _by assumption_.
At Mercuri position T_ab /= 0 (textbooks typical solution is a 1-body
one) and at Sun T_ab /= 0 also. Since i have no current acess to that
paper i do not know they studied. I suspect that the work may be
related to analitic continuation to 'internal' (surface) region but i
do not know.
He cites Narlikar and Padmanabhan. Found. of Physics 1988, 18, 6.
Someone with a copy of that paper? Some public rebuttal published or
so?
Without a copy of the work i cannot understand from where they claim
two different values for the T-00.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
- Next by Date: Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
- Next by thread: Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
- Index(es):