sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: fuzzy electron clouds
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: davee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Russell
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: Why is Dumb ledore so Dumb?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: sal
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: einstein was right
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: einstein was right
  • From: Igor
• Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is relativity relative?
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity - Proven by Dork.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
  • From: harry
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Trevor Morris
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is relativity relative?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Trevor Morris
• Re: Is relativity relative?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Is relativity relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is relativity relative?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: sal
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Is relativity relative?
  • From: leosarasua
• Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
  • From: harry
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why is Dumb ledore so Dumb?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: jem
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: Article: Endless Universe Made Possible By New Model [MIME]
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
  • From: harry
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why is Dumb ledore so Dumb?
  • From: Seven Seas Oscirius
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Seven Seas Oscirius
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Seven Seas Oscirius
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer)
  • From: SCW
• Re: = = = = = = = = = HAMMOND GOD BOOK
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Einstein S.O.L and mirror thought experiment?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why is Dumb ledore so Dumb?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
  • From: David Cross
• Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
  • From: xxein
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: Stamenin
• The Air - Anti-Gravity
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
  • From: JanPB
• Re: tensor "reverse trace" operation?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor "reverse trace" operation?
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Einstein S.O.L and mirror thought experiment?
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: PD
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: PD
• Re: Sorry, I've been having News Server Problems.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: sal
• Re: Some Idle musings whilst flicking through the Usenet Physics FAQ
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: einstein was right
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: tensor "reverse trace" operation?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: sal
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & Mass Definition.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: einstein was right
  • From: Igor
• Re: tensor "reverse trace" operation?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: tensor "reverse trace" operation?
  • From: Igor
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: einstein was right
  • From: PD
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: einstein was right
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: sal
• Re: Sorry, I've been having News Server Problems.
  • From: PD
• Re: Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
  • From: dlzc
• tensor "reverse trace" operation?
  • From: Mike
• Re: einstein was right
  • From: PD
• Re: Some Idle musings whilst flicking through the Usenet Physics FAQ
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Some Idle musings whilst flicking through the Usenet Physics FAQ
  • From: sal
• Re: Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Some Idle musings whilst flicking through the Usenet Physics FAQ
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Some Idle musings whilst flicking through the Usenet Physics FAQ
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: tensor question
  • From: sal
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: harry
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Seven Seas Oscirius
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Seven Seas Oscirius
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: harry
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: harry
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: harry
• Re: massless phonons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Sorry, I've been having News Server Problems.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sorry, I've been having News Server Problems.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On reference frames in 4D space
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Some Idle musings whilst flicking through the Usenet Physics FAQ
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• Some Idle musings whilst flicking through the Usenet Physics FAQ
  • From: SCW
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: einstein was right
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Barry
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer)
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: tensor question
  • From: sal
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Sorry, I've been having News Server Problems.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: karandash2000
• The Human Skin as "An Engine"
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: The Hypergeometrical Hyperon Family
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Barry
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Barry
• Re: if plank constants are wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sorry, I've been having News Server Problems.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: is time orthogonal on which axe?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: einstein was right
  • From: JanPB
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: the art of tensors
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Barry
• Re: tensor question
  • From: sal
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Trevor Morris
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: massless phonons
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Trevor Morris
• Re: circular vision
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: wrong relativity or simultaneity exists
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: why diffrent atoms like to stik together
  • From: SCW
• Re: Schwarzchild Limit Question
  • From: mathematician
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: PD
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Hypergeometrical Standard Model and Cosmological Theory was published
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Sorry, I've been having News Server Problems.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: ALERT: "TMG"----THE WHOI STALKER
  • From: kk
• Re: Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: sal
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Trevor Morris
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: dlzc
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: surrealistic-dream@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: BAD NEWS FOR EINSTEIN'S CRIMINALS
  • From: surrealistic-dream@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer)
  • From: SCW
• Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer)
  • From: SCW
• Re: On reference frames in 4D space
  • From: jem
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Trevor Morris
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Trevor Morris
• Re: The predictions of special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• The predictions of special relativity
  • From: Phil Gardner
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: harry
• Re: Making real gravity to prove unified field theory.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Making real gravity to prove unified field theory.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Hypergeometrical Hyperon Family
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Hypergeometrical Standard Model and Cosmological Theory was published
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Making real gravity to prove unified field theory.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Hypergeometrical Standard Model and Cosmological Theory was published
  • From: ny2292000
• The Hypergeometrical Hyperon Family
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: G. Hobba
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: G. Hobba
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Barry
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: shuba
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Barry
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Barry
• Re: Any Relation between special theory of relativity and de broglie's wavelength?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: tensor question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & the Kerr Metric.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Any Relation between special theory of relativity and de broglie's wavelength?
  • From: Igor
• Re: (Evil) Google Groups 3 Beta is the Worst One Yet.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Any Relation between special theory of relativity and de broglie's wavelength?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: YBM
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Mike
• Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A black hole is a frozen supernova, not a frozen star.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: stephen
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: On reference frames in 4D space
  • From: jem
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: jem
• From image formation by a plane mirror to the generation of (human) visual consciousness
  • From: mantaintai
• Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• From image formation by a plane mirror to the generation of (human) visual consciousness
  • From: mantaintai
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: tensor question
  • From: sal
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Nigol
• Re: tensor question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Sci.Physics FAQ assumes an unphysical, metaphysical notion.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: tensor question
  • From: sal
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: valls
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: valls
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Any Relation between special theory of relativity and de broglie's wavelength?
  • From: ANON.ymous
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: valls
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: YBM
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: YBM
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: the art of tensors
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: vic
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: vic
• Re: the art of tensors
  • From: vic
• Re: the art of tensors
  • From: vic
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• not yet answered questions
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Barry
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: G. Hobba
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Theo Newburgh
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Any Relation between special theory of relativity and de broglie's wavelength?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: the art of tensors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the art of tensors
  • From: Igor
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Igor
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Any Relation between special theory of relativity and de broglie's wavelength?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & Plancks constant.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: circular vision
  • From: Igor
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: the proof for ether is here
  • From: Igor
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No more please
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Nigol
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: No more please
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: fuzzy electron clouds
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: Any Relation between special theory of relativity and de broglie's wavelength?
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: No more please
  • From: Mike
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Any Relation between special theory of relativity and de broglie's wavelength?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Photons as temporal standing waves.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Mike
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Any Relation between special theory of relativity and de broglie's wavelength?
  • From: ANON.ymous
• Re: No more please
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: No more please
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: No more please
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: massless phonons
  • From: vic
• Photons as temporal standing waves.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: On reference frames in 4D space
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: On reference frames in 4D space
  • From: jem
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: No more please
  • From: Mike
• Re: On reference frames in 4D space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: massless phonons
  • From: Peter Christensen
• On reference frames in 4D space
  • From: vps137
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No more please
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: No more please
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: No more please
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Brainiac science and the embankment/train thingy!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Barry
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Barry
• Re: tensor question
  • From: shuba
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: sal
• Re: Brainiac science and the embankment/train thingy!
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: remixed
• Re: Rotation is absolute
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Pmb
• tensor question
  • From: Mike
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: No more please
  • From: Mike
• Re: Brainiac science and the embankment/train thingy!
  • From: xxein
• Re: Rotation is absolute
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Rotation is absolute
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Wrong deSitter space Penrose diagram - but idea still works
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: G. Hobba
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: wrong relativity or simultaneity exists
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: fuzzy electron clouds
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: can relativity make lost teeth grow?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Which one is ewe?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: the art of tensors
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question of Dark Matter and Dark Energy Solved - Dark Energy Comes From Life Intelligence and Patterns
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Brainiac science and the embankment/train thingy!
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Barry
• Re: circular vision
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: SCW
• Re: Rotation is absolute
  • From: Sue...
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the proof for ether is here
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Rotation is absolute
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: can relativity make lost teeth grow?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Rotation is absolute
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: fuzzy electron clouds
  • From: Igor
• Re: the proof for ether is here
  • From: Igor
• Re: can relativity make lost teeth grow?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: can relativity make lost teeth grow?
  • From: Igor
• Re: circular vision
  • From: Igor
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Rotation is absolute
  • From: Sue...
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Rotation is absolute
  • From: sal
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: circular vision
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Rotation is absolute
  • From: harry
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Rotation is absolute
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Rotation is absolute
  • From: sal
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: sal
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: SCW
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: SCW
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: SCW
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: Vector Visual 3D (PDS)
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: sal
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: harry
• Question of Dark Matter and Dark Energy Solved - Dark Energy Comes From Life Intelligence and Patterns
  • From: sidwiki.com
• Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: No more please
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: No more please
  • From: bergeron
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: harry
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Vector Visual 3D (PDS)
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: bergeron
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: harry
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: harry
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: harry
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: bergeron
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: fuzzy electron clouds
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: the proof for ether is here
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: fuzzy electron clouds
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: yen, ka-in
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: valls
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: valls
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Vacuum light speed
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: vacuum dragging
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Vacuum light speed
  • From: valls
• Re: vacuum dragging
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Igor
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Igor
• vacuum dragging
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: sal
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: JanPB
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Igor
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Igor
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Fatal error in Lorentz Ether Theory
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: sal
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Nigol
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Hypergeometrical Standard Model and Cosmological Theory was published
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist
  • From: Seven Seas Oscirius
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: No more please
  • From: harry
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Article: Sending Einstein into a spin
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: harry
• Re: Gravitomagnetism article in AJP
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Hypergeometrical Standard Model and Cosmological Theory was published
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Hypergeometrical Standard Model and Cosmological Theory was published
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: sal
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: sal
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: sal
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: PD
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Mike
• Re: No more please
  • From: Mike
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Stamenin
• .Simple SR question...
  • From: Jim Hutton
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gravitomagnetism article in AJP
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Gravitomagnetism article in AJP
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Efficient Engines - [ Engineering ]
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Gravitomagnetism article in AJP
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: sal
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: sal
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: sal
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Dumbledore
• attn: aurilia - extremely fantabulous finances - vop dorze ig - (1/1)
  • From: alano
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: sal
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Magnet question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: sal
• Magnet question
  • From: sal
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: sal
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Momentum" defined
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Igor
• "Momentum" defined
  • From: Pmb
• Modern SpaceTime (ping Daryl).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Pmb
• Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors
  • From: Psy-Kosh
• Re: No more please
  • From: bergeron
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: PD
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: PD
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: noshellswill
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: bergeron
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: PD
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: PD
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: GRAVITY AT SMALL DISTANCES
  • From: greysky
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: jem
• Re: There is no physical length contraction in SR
  • From: PD
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Nigol
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bergeron
• Re: FYI - Einstein Articles(1906/1907)
  • From: harry
• Re: Relative Time
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: GRAVITY AT SMALL DISTANCES
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: harry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Mike
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: There is no physical length contraction in SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Relative Time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?
  • From: WillE1
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: There is no physical length contraction in SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relative Time
  • From: noshellswill
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR and mass - simple question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: FYI - Einstein Articles(1906/1907)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR and mass - simple question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR and mass - simple question
  • From: sal
• Re: No more please
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Relative Time
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: FYI - Einstein Articles(1906/1907)
  • From: sal
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Only One White Hole Per Universe?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: No more please
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Relative Time
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Relative Time
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Relative Time
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: No more please
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relative Time
  • From: dlzc
• Re: No more please
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Don Mortella
• Re: FYI - Einstein Articles(1906/1907)
  • From: harry
• Re: Relative Time
  • From: Sue...
• Relative Time
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• Re: FYI - Einstein Articles(1906/1907)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: Surfer
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"</h2></b>
  • From: Nigol
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: FYI - Einstein Articles(1906/1907)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: FYI - Einstein Articles(1906/1907)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: FYI - Einstein Articles(1906/1907)
  • From: harry
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: No more please
  • From: harry
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Don Mortella
• Re: Only One White Hole Per Universe?
  • From: freeearthdotorg
• Re: FYI - Einstein Articles(1906/1907)
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No more please
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• FYI - Einstein Articles(1906/1907)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• self-establishment prepare for The U-turn
  • From: remixed
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: nabla
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: Jim D.
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Mike
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Only One White Hole Per Universe?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: No more please
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Nigol
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: brad
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Igor
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: No more please
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: No more please
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No more please
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No more please
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• re:Global cooling - 65 storm-related deaths reported
  • From: Action Jackson
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Don Mortella
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Wolfgang G. Gasser
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: Jim D.
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: No more please
  • From: bergeron
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: what is faster
  • From: gregegan
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Mike
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No more please
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: No more please
  • From: bergeron
• Re: what is faster
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Only One White Hole Per Universe?
  • From: freeearthdotorg
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Don Mortella
• Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: No more please
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: No more please
  • From: bergeron
• Re: what is faster
  • From: gregegan
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bergeron
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: what is faster
  • From: gregegan
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: No more please
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Question about dark matter
  • From: Jim D.
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: wrong relativity or simultaneity exists
  • From: Igor
• Re: Schwarzchild Limit Question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Mike
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: Igor
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Mike
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: No more please
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: fitz
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Slebal
• Re: No more please
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Only One White Hole Per Universe?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Mike
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what is faster
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: MathMagician
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: No more please
  • From: bergeron
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: bergeron
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bergeron
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Trevor Morris
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Trevor Morris
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Mozart21
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: SR and mass - simple question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: what is faster
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Only One White Hole Per Universe?
  • From: freeearthdotorg
• Re: what is faster
  • From: nabla
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: what is faster
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: if two particles colides
  • From: PD
• Re: There is no physical length contraction in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: what is faster
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: massless photons
  • From: PD
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Trevor Morris
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Slebal
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Schwarzchild Limit Question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Schwarzchild Limit Question
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: SR and mass - simple question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Schwarzchild Limit Question
  • From: mathematician
• Re: what is faster
  • From: nabla
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: SR and mass - simple question
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR and mass - simple question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: SR and mass - simple question
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: what is faster
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: nabla
• Re: what is faster
  • From: nabla
• Re: what is faster
  • From: nabla
• Re: what is faster
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: what is faster
  • From: nabla
• wrong relativity or simultaneity exists
  • From: nabla
• Re: what is faster
  • From: dlzc
• speed of expansion exceds speed of light
  • From: nabla
• what is faster
  • From: nabla
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: if two particles colides
  • From: nabla
• Re: SR and mass - simple question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: sal
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: David
• SR and mass - simple question
  • From: David
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: David
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Igor
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: Igor
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: bergeron
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: sal
• Re: electron beam
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: electron beam
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: massless photons
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: massless photons
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: if two particles colides
  • From: Igor
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Igor
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: No more please
  • From: dlzc
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Pmb
• Re: No more please
  • From: pmb
• Re: electron beam
  • From: dlzc
• Re: massless photons
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Barry
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jem
• Re: electron beam
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: No more please
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: No more please
  • From: harry
• Re: electron beam
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: electron beam
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No more please
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No more please
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• electron beam
  • From: silent
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: art_deco_erfc_1024
• Re: No more please
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: massless photons
  • From: 8 emails per day
• Re: massless photons
  • From: 8 emails per day
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: massless photons
  • From: pneumatic
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: My Music
• Re: Answering simple questions (was RE: massless photons)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: if two particles colides
  • From: My Music
• Re: what is yardtric
  • From: My Tube
• Re: what is an errorbar?
  • From: My Tube
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Answering simple questions (was RE: massless photons)
  • From: Cosmik Debris
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Pmb
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: massless photons
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: massless photons
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: sal
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: No more please
  • From: Pmb
• What's with Gravity Probe B?
  • From: f . kraut
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Igor
• Re: No more please
  • From: dlzc
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Mozart21
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Mozart21
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Mozart21
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: sal
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: massless photons
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: No more please
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: massless photons
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Igor
• Re: if two particles colides
  • From: Igor
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: Igor
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Igor
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: sal
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: massless photons
  • From: PD
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Igor
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• No more please
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Mozart21
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless photons
  • From: pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: pmb
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: massless photons
  • From: pmb
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: massless photons
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: massless photons
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Barry
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Mozart21
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Barry
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Answering simple questions (was RE: massless photons)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• What Broke the Symmetry?
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Mozart21
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Mike
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Mike
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: massless photons
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Slebal
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: Mozart21
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: the speed of light is not continuous
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Sue...
• SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: massless photons
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: bergeron
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: bergeron
• Re: massless photons
  • From: bergeron
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: what is an errorbar?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• RICHARD DAWKINS RESPONSE TO HAMMOND
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: massless photons
  • From: bergeron
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: massless photons
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Cosmik Debris
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Answering simple questions (was RE: massless photons)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Answering simple questions (was RE: massless photons)
  • From: Cosmik Debris
• Re: massless photons
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: massless photons
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: massless photons
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: bergeron
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: art_deco_erfc_1024
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Cosmik Debris
• Re: what is yardtric
  • From: Barry
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: PD
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: what is yardtric
  • From: Barry
• Re: what is yardtric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: PD
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment
  • From: shuba
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Igor
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Igor
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Barry
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Mike
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: karandash2000
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Slebal
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: A simple thought experiment concerning Hawking radiation
  • From: dlzc
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: A simple thought experiment concerning Hawking radiation
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: A simple thought experiment concerning Hawking radiation
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Pmb
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: xxein
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Number '1'
  • From: xxein
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: Pmb
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: pmb
• On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Russell
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Russell
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A simple thought experiment concerning Hawking radiation
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: shuba
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: sal
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: PD
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: PD
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Russell
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Slebal
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: A simple thought experiment concerning Hawking radiation
  • From: Matthias Plaue
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: A simple thought experiment concerning Hawking radiation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Russell
• Re: More questions on the LT
  • From: PD
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• A simple thought experiment concerning Hawking radiation
  • From: Matthias Plaue
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: harry
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: bergeron
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: bergeron
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: shuba
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: pmb
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: sal
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: bergeron
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Slebal
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: harry
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: harry
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: Pmb
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: pmb
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: harry
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: sal
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: sal
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: pmb
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: David
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: harry
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Relativity and Elliptic Space
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: TOM ROBERTS! I HAVE READ YOUR DERIVATION OF RELATIVITY! I SUPPORT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: davee
• Re: Relativity and Elliptic Space
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Relativity and Elliptic Space
  • From: jan . verheul
• The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: sal
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: bergeron
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: shuba
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Biggest crackpot became popular
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Biggest crackpot became popular
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Biggest crackpot became popular
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Colloquium: Experimental Tests of SR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: TOM ROBERTS! I HAVE READ YOUR DERIVATION OF RELATIVITY! I SUPPORT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: An Announcement
  • From: Igor
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: WaveMechanic
• Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: kenseto
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: sal
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Pmb
• An Announcement
  • From: Me
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Biggest crackpot became popular
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Biggest crackpot became popular
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: shuba
• Re: Biggest crackpot became popular
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Uncertainty Principle Is For Man/Not For The Infinite Intellect
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Biggest crackpot became popular
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Biggest crackpot became popular
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: shuba
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: erfc-1024
• Re: Relativity and Elliptic Space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Brazil experiment detects absolute motion
  • From: Surfer
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Biggest crackpot became popular
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Pmb
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Biggest crackpot became popular
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: My Tube
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: My Tube
• Re: The Uncertainty Principle Is For Man/Not For The Infinite Intellect
  • From: My Tube
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: yhh8ygved
• Biggest crackpot became popular
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Relativity and Elliptic Space
  • From: davee
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: sal
• Re: Relativity and Elliptic Space
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment
  • From: shuba
• Re: The Uncertainty Principle Is For Man/Not For The Infinite Intellect
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: why is light visible
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Barry
• Re: entropy and enthaphy, permeablity and permitivity, quantum reality.
  • From: davee
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Uncertainty Principle Is For Man/Not For The Infinite Intellect
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• entropy and enthaphy, permeablity and permitivity, quantum reality.
  • From: davee
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: kenseto
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: David
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: kenseto
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Definition of vector, 1-form and tensor
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The IRT transform equations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Definition of vector, 1-form and tensor
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• The Uncertainty Principle Is For Man/Not For The Infinite Intellect
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: rambus2005
• The IRT transform equations
  • From: kenseto
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR question
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: jamesahart79
• Here (Re: error in mathematics behind black holes)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
  • From: shuba
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: TRANSFORMATIONS OF FORCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• TRANSFORMATIONS OF FORCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: borje
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: jem
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Z 1 Y 0 N 3 X
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: harry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: harry
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: shuba
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Minkowski Metric
  • From: shuba
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: sal
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Unified Field Theory
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Virgin Mary and Relativity Mirrors
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: JanPB
• Virgin Mary and relativity mirrors
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: sal
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: sal
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: sal
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Constipated Eric Gisse
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: sal
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: sal
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: David
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: David
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: dlzc
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: GR question
  • From: harry
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: jem
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: jem
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Constipated Eric Gisse
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: harry
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?
  • From: David
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: jem
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: sal
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity and Elliptic Space
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relativistic approach
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relativistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relativistic approach
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This universe is a quantum computer:
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relativistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: This universe is a quantum computer:
  • From: fitz
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is this a joke?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: xxein
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is this a joke?
  • From: shuba
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Relativity and Elliptic Space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: xxein
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Attention Bill Hobba
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Russell
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Sorcerer Androcles
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: GR question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is this a joke?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: PD
• Re: Is this a joke?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Andro
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie - a hotbed for crackpots/
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie - a hotbed for crackpots/
  • From: Mike
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Manuel
• Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie - a hotbed for crackpots/
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: PD
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Manuel
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Manuel
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: PD
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Manuel
• Re: Colloquium: Experimental Tests of SR
  • From: PD
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Andro
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Manuel
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Manuel
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Andro
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and Elliptic Space
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Andro
• Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Andro
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach
  • From: Barry
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• error in mathematics behind black holes
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Andro
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Andro
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: sal
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: jem
• Relativity and Elliptic Space
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Andro
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: jem
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: David
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: jem
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: harry
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: jem
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: David
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Attention Bill Hobba
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Colloquium: Experimental Tests of SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Andro
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: GR: General Relativity or Great erroR?
  • From: Surfer
• Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity Fact and Fiction,
  • From: harry
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Relativity Fact and Fiction,
  • From: harry
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Is this a joke?
  • From: bergeron
• Re: GR question
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Attention Bill Hobba
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: sal
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: sal
• Re: GR question
  • From: bergeron
• Re: New math for TR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: sal
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Andro
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: sal
• new math for TR - resubmission
  • From: Kanuk
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• New math for TR
  • From: Kanuk
• New math for TR
  • From: Kanuk
• Attention Bill Hobba
  • From: Pmb
• New math for TR
  • From: Kanuk
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• new math for TR - transformations
  • From: Kanuk
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: David
• New math for TR
  • From: Kanuk
• Re: Is this a joke?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Is this a joke?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is this a joke?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Is this a joke?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: sal
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: sal
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: David
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: David
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: sal
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: David
• THE GENESIS. (for professors and children)
  • From: socratus
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: Relativity Fact and Fiction,
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity Fact and Fiction,
  • From: harry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: pmb
• Re: Why does SRT and LET have identical Math???
  • From: PD
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Andro
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Andro
• Re: Relativity Fact and Fiction,
  • From: Andro
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: PD
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: jan . verheul
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: sal
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: jem
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: jem
• Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: jem
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: GR question
  • From: harry
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativity Fact and Fiction,
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativity Fact and Fiction,
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Relativity Fact and Fiction,
  • From: Bruce Harvey
• Re: GR question
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GR question
  • From: Bruce Harvey
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: harry
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Andro
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Surfer
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: More Word Salad
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• More Word Salad
  • From: Barry
• Re: This universe is a quantum computer:
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• Re: This universe is a quantum computer:
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• Re: This universe is a quantum computer:
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• Re: This universe is a quantum computer:
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• This universe is a quantum computer:
  • From: fitz
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: sal
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why does SRT and LET have identical Math???
  • From: shuba
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Russell
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: Barry
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Wally Sewell
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Colloquium: Experimental Tests of SR
  • From: shuba
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Wally Sewell
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: time travel unparadox
  • From: PD
• Re: using minus time to describe black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Wally Sewell
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• time travel unparadox
  • From: Manuel
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: sal
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Andro
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Retnec
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Jan VR
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Why does SRT and LET have identical Math???
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Colloquium: Experimental Tests of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: using minus time to describe black hole
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: dlzc
• Re: New math for TR
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Igor
• Re: GR question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Igor
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: GR question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: Here's Another Force Question.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: sal
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Wally Sewell
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Why does SRT and LET have identical Math???
  • From: PD
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox
  • From: Wally Sewell
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Mike
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Why does SRT and LET have identical Math???
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Colloquium: Experimental Tests of SR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Space: Like a river
  • From: harry
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Why does SRT and LET have identical Math???
  • From: PD
• Re: Why does SRT and LET have identical Math???
  • From: PD
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Help with simple clock question
  • From: harry
• Re: GR question
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: harry
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Mike
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Space: Like a river
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Mike
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Help with simple clock question
  • From: David
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Space: Like a river
  • From: harry
• GR question
  • From: Bruce Harvey
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: socratus
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: sal
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: sal
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Barry
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why does SRT and LET have identical Math???
  • From: bbbl67
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Barry
• Re: Why does SRT and LET have identical Math???
  • From: bbbl67
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• This universe is a quantum computer
  • From: fitz
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: dej4
• Before you post your "corrections to Einstein's SR" check the math...
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New math for TR
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: thomas . wai . wong
• Space: Like a river
  • From: Surfer
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Jan VR
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Here's Another Force Question.
  • From: Mike
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Jan VR
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Here's Another Force Question.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: jem
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
  • From: Mike
• Re: Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Do physicists understand physics?
  • From: socratus
• Re: About the inertial coordinate systems
  • From: bergeron
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Here's Another Force Question.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Here's Another Force Question.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Second Postulate of SR
  • From: Pmb
• Re: johnreed Catch 22
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why does SRT and LET have identical Math???
  • From: shuba
• Re: New math for TR
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: using minus time to describe black hole
  • From: the artist
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: This Divine Creation: Without QM Fraud!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Fred Diether
• Re: New math for TR
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This Divine Creation: Without QM Fraud!
  • From: MTwain
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About the inertial coordinate systems
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Pmb
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Pmb
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: New math for TR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• New math for TR
  • From: kanuk
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Surfer
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Surfer
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Jan VR
• Re: 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Mike
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: sal
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: sal
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: jem
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: jem
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Russell
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Russell
• Re: 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: vps137
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: More Trivialities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: using minus time to describe black hole
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• More Trivialities
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Fred Diether
• Re: About the inertial coordinate systems
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: using minus time to describe black hole
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: using minus time to describe black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sorcerer
• using minus time to describe black hole
  • From: the artist
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Barry
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• About the inertial coordinate systems
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: vlcek
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Surfer
• Re: GR: General Relativity or Great erroR?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR: General Relativity or Great erroR?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Mike
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: GR: General Relativity or Great erroR?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: GR: General Relativity or Great erroR?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: jem
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: harry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: harry
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: William D. Walker
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time
  • From: noshellswill
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Time
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GR: General Relativity or Great erroR?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: May the New Year bring new insight and Solutions
  • From: Mike
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Barry
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Time
  • From: Purrcy
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: harry
• Re: Time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: Mike
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: Mike
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativistic Clock corrections
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sorcerer
• Relativistic Clock corrections
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Time
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: harry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: harry
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation is not correct.Not correct is symetrical form intensity of moving charge.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz transformation is not correct.Not correct is symetrical form intensity of moving charge.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz transformation is not correct.Not correct is symetrical form intensity of moving charge.
  • From: vlcek
• Re: Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Barry
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: fitz
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: shuba
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: Shepherd Moon
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• black-body radiation
  • From: Luca
• Re: Shapiro Delay and the Solar System Galactic Motion
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: The "weight" of information
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• The "weight" of information
  • From: Shepherd Moon
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Sorcerer
• "Gravity"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Don Mortel
• Re: Lorentz transformation is not correct.Not correct is symetrical form intensity of moving charge.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: jem
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: AE, luce a non lucente
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation is not correct.Not correct is symetrical form intensity of moving charge.
  • From: vlcek
• Re: Lorentz transformation is not correct.Not correct is symetrical form intensity of moving charge.
  • From: karandash2000
• Lorentz transformation is not correct.Not correct is symetrical form intensity of moving charge.
  • From: vlcek
• Medium is not aether
  • From: vlcek
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: vlcek
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: vlcek
• Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN
  • From: vlcek
• Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: AE, luce a non lucente
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Mike
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source
  • From: Forumodus of Halicarnassus
• A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.
  • From: Jan VR
• Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
  • From: kenseto
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: jem
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: jem
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Mike
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Mike
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: bergeron
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Barry
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: JanPB
• Even More Constructive Opining
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: bergeron
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• A New Year of Constructive Opining
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: bergeron
• Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: GR: General Relativity or Great erroR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR: General Relativity or Great erroR?
  • From: shuba
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• GR: General Relativity or Great erroR?
  • From: Juan R.
• Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: PD
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: PD
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?
  • From: socratus
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: jem
• Re: Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Philosophy : The Perspective of the Universe
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Curvature Cosmology
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Curvature Cosmology
  • From: David Crawford
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Perihelion of Mercury question
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: shuba
• Philosophy : The Perspective of the Universe
  • From: brad
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: JanPB
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: johnreed Catch 22
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is this serious?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine