Re: Time
- From: "Justintruth" <truth.justin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Jan 2007 04:12:39 -0800
I have a question that you might be willing to answer....
If I take a charged partical and sinusoidaly oscillate it by bringing a
very heavy mass close on one side and letting it fall toward it and
then bringing another heavy mass onto the other side and removing the
first heavy mass so that the particle is oscilating only due to gravity
then will photons be emitted?
Conversely if I put a charged partical onto a test stand and keep it
fixed in space but change the gravitational forces around the partical
so that it experiences a force from the test stand that is sinusoidal
will the particle radiate?
If the first answer is "Yes" then doesn't that mean that the principle
of equivalence is violated because if I am in an elevator with it I
could use the radiation as an accelerometer?
If the second answer is "Yes" doesn't this mean that gravity causes
radiation? ... or does the test stand? or... ????
Its a bit like asking a doctor for a free diagnosis at a party or a
lawyer for a free opinion but what the hell... I'm more curious than
proud!
Thanks either way.
On Jan 4, 2:26 am, "Sue..." <suzysewns...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Purrcy wrote:
Time is a Vector
The following are the differential equations for the vector Time:
(1)The Divergence of the vector Time equals one divided by c.
(2)The Curl of the vector Time equals the unit vector k divided by c.
where the unit vector k is the vector omega divided the absolute value
of the vector omega.
In the above equations, the value for c, the speed of light, comes from
the equation for the equivalence of mass and wave energy (i.e. Photon
energy:)
(3)one divided by c equals the square-root of (m divided by h-bar omega.)
where h-bar is the Dirac constant, and omega is the photon frequency
times two-pi. The vector omega defines the rotational axis for a photon
orbiting about a fixed point in space.
The source of equation (1) is a particle, whose source is a photon,
defined by equation (2). Photons are emitted by any body of mass which
has thermal energy. Consider a Star which emits photons: these photons
are snap-shots of the properties of the particles which emit them, at
the instant of time when they were emitted. The properties which the
photon has during its travel through space are constant. They do not
change. They are conserved. According to equation (3), those
properties are mass, time, frequency and energy. The frequency of the
photon is the rate of time at which the energy of the photon was
emitted. This is the color which visible photons have. Duration of
time is a property of the speed of light, which we know is a constant.
A photon is a snap-shot of history. In fact, everything you see about
you is history; even the image of the person sitting next to you is
delayed in time, and is past-time, history. When you see a Star on a
clear dark night what you are seeing is where that Star was millions of
years ago and a million light-years away.
Consider a thought experiment: light-posts are placed one-hundred feet
apart in all directions on a flat plane. The lights on top of these
posts are arranged so that they all flash 'simultaneously' (a difficult
thing to do.) If you were at the center of this array of lights, what
would you see when they flash? You would see a symmetrical ring of
light, with you at the center, traveling away from you at the speed of
light. In fact, anybody placed anywhere on that flat plane would see
the exact identical thing that you see: a symmetrical ring of light
traveling away from them at the speed of light, with them at the center
of the ring. What this says about light and time is that Time is a
local phenomena; time-zero exists only somewhere behind your eyes and
between your ears, and that is different for everyone. In fact, not
only does everybody have their own time-zero, but they have their own
rate of time also; this is what time dilation says. Time dilation (a
misnomer) is a property of time and matter-in-motion.
Getting back to equation (1), each photon has a value of time (the
distance it has traveled) which is constant and travels at the speed of
light. This is a vector.Can you prove that?
<<Now, does not the prize to Einstein imply
that the Academy recognised the particle
nature of light? The Nobel Committee says
that Einstein had found that the energy exchange
between matter and ether occurs by atoms emitting
or absorbing a quantum of energy,hv .
As a consequence of the new concept of light quanta
(in modern terminology photons) Einstein proposed the
law that an electron emitted from a substance by
monochromatic light with the frequency has to have
a maximum energy of E=hv-p, where p is the energy needed to
remove the electron from the substance. Robert Andrews
Millikan carried out a series of measurements over a
period of 10 years, finally confirming the validity of this
law in 1916 with great accuracy. Millikan had, however,
found the idea of light quanta to be unfamiliar and strange.
The Nobel Committee avoids committing itself to the
particle concept. Light-quanta or with modern terminology,
photons, were explicitly mentioned in the reports on
which the prize decision rested only in connection with
emission and absorption processes. The Committee says
that the most important application of Einstein's photoelectric
law and also its most convincing confirmation has come from
the use Bohr made of it in his theory of atoms, which explains
a vast amount of spectroscopic data. >>http://nobelprize.org/physics/articles/ekspong/index.html
You could draw a spherically symmetric shell
at any distance, r, from the center of that Star, and every photon on
that shell would have the same value of time - a time which represents
the age and position of that Star at some time in the past.
Equation (1) says that photons are the messengers of time (time's
duration.) So, what is a photon? It is a constant, and it is
conserved. Its properties are described by the Dirac constant:
(4)h-bar equals mc-squared divided by omega.
Where omega represents the frequency of the photon's energy. The source
for equation (2) is the energy distribution of a photon orbiting about a
fixed point in space. It describes a ring of energy traveling at the
speed of light and circling a fixed point in space. This defines a
particle! It is the definition of a particle of mass, m, where that
stationary mass is equal to the 'mass of the photon', and the frequency
(or, rate of time) at which it orbits that point in space. A particle
of mass is fixed in space because equation (2) has no translational
energy. The vector omega in equation (2) defines the axis of symmetry
for the photon distribution about it. It follows the right-hand rule.
A particle of mass, m, is conserved because the photon, and the photon's
orbit about that fixed point, is conserved. Photons and particles are
quanta, with quantum number, n, defined by their energy:
(5)E is equal to nh.
Where h is the Planck Constant. The frequency of a photon, or a
particle, is conserved, it is an integer, n, and it is a quantum number.How can a pseudo particle conserve energy?
Particles and photons are complimentary 'properties' of time; they are
two sides of the same coin. Particles describe the rate of time, and a
photon time's duration.
Equations (1) and (2) are the two most fundamental equations in physics.
One more equation should be presented to complete these time equations:
(6)the vector Time Cross (the Curl of the vector Time) equals minus the
unit vector j divided by acceleration, a
where,
(7)the acceleration, a equals c-squared divided by r,
(8)minus the unit vector j equals minus the vector r divided by the
absolute value of the vector r.
Equation (6) describes the acceleration on the mass distribution of a
photon orbiting a stationary point in space, which defines a particle as
given in equation (2). This acceleration should be an expected result,
as most students should realize. The photon is a stable quantum which
does no work and has no work done on it.
All of these equations should be obvious to any physics student, or
physicist. Yet, we have never overcome the obstacle that people think
of time as a scalar, or even a pseudo-scalar. However, Time has even
more properties than I have shown here: Time also has dimension.No... it has a symmetry with energy:
<< invariance with respect to time translation gives the
well known law of conservation of energy >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem
Particles and photons exist in different dimensions of time; also, when
photons and particles interact, their combination, for a short period of
time, exists in still another dimension of time, an imaginary dimension
of Time. The dimensionality of the vector Time is seen when we consider
the physical aspects of a body in motion; that is, the rate of time
decreases, from it stationary state, when it is in motion with an
apparent speed, v. This phenomena is what we call time dilation, but
time is multidimensional, and the dilation of a scalar value of time
does not actually occur. This is why time dilation is a misnomer, a
body's rate of time is what changes. I will discuss this in another
paper, if there is enough interest in this paper.<< So, what do you think? >>
I think you have made up a word salad about non-existant particles.
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL3D/visualizations/light/index.htm
Sue...
Ron Poteet
12-30-2006
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time
- From: Sue...
- Re: Time
- References:
- Re: Time
- From: Sue...
- Re: Time
- Prev by Date: Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity
- Next by Date: Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6
- Previous by thread: Re: Time
- Next by thread: Re: Time
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
