Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:15:05 -0800
In sci.physics.relativity, HW@....(Henri Wilson)
<HW@>
wrote
on Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:19:06 GMT
<dlhiq2ln9ic2dvadrhv578r992f7rvg4sb@xxxxxxx>:
On 12 Jan 2007 14:43:10 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 12, 3:30 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:49:11 -0800, The Ghost In The Machine
Ghost, size is relative.
An electron is HUGE in the eyes of a quark or neutrino.
You should learn about fractals.
More crap invented from whole cloth from someone "born with a
scientific mind". Got any experimental evidence *whatsoever* that an
electron is bigger than a quark or a neutrino?
Ask Ghost, It was HIS claim, not mine.
Somehow, I missed making that claim....?! AFAIK all three are point
particles.
And is this fractal bon-mot part of some particle theory of yours you
are modeling with some crappy VisualBasic code?
Is the Earth large compard with a relativist, Draper?
Is a relativist large compared with a H atom, Draper.
Is Draper leading the pack in the 'idiot of the month award'?
Insults do not an argument make.
PD
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Useless C++ Programming Idea #10239993:
char * f(char *p) {char *q = malloc(strlen(p)); strcpy(q,p); return q; }
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- References:
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
- From: PD
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
- Prev by Date: Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
- Next by Date: Re: The IRT transform equations
- Previous by thread: Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
- Next by thread: Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|