Re: error in mathematics behind black holes


karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx ha escrito:

Problem is that "Regress in Physics" publishes shit ONLY. You missed
that, abbott.

From the AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY (APS) link i cited before:

"There is no quantitative metric of excellence. High impact factor
journal publication is not a measure of excellence of the individual,"
said Blume."

And they warns: "They believe some universities may simply look at the
impact factors of journals they've published in, rather than carefully
review the individual's work."

Apparently you are one of those [*] simply looking to the impact factor
of the journal "rather than carefully review the individual's work."

For you a paper is wrong just because has been published in a journal
you mock as "Regress in physics". Appart from other you listed.

Your is not a scientific attitude and even is not _ethical_.

Papers are either correct or wrong _because_ content NO because _where_
were published. I know papers published in top journals are plain wrong
_because_ its content was wrong.


[*] Folks with paranormal capabilities are able to predict if a work is
correct or wrong without reading it.

Those folks developed their paranormal capabilities at such one high
level are always able to differentiate between excellence and -in your
own words- "shit" with a zero margin for error. Those folks are also
known as "The perfect reviewer" and are highly estimatted by journals
because never making errors of any kind.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: impact factor
    ... factor is better or a journal with low impact factor is better. ... Journals with high impact factors are *supposedly* better. ... The importance of the impact factor is controversial. ...
    (sci.math.research)
  • Re: impact factor
    ... I am vikash. ... journals. ... So please let me know whether a journal with high impact ... and a description of the methodology at ...
    (sci.math.research)
  • Re: impact factor
    ... please let me know whether a journal with high impact factor is ... better or a journal with low impact factor is better.Also i want to ... one generally expexts higher quality journals to have a higher impact ...
    (sci.math.research)
  • Re: impact factor
    ... vicky wrote: ... I am vikash. ... a journal with high impact factor is better then ... a factor for science journals than for math journals. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: impact factor
    ... I am vikash. ... So please let me know whether a journal with high impact ... factor is better or a journal with low impact factor is better. ... (Among journals in the same field.) ...
    (sci.math.research)