Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
- From: "G. L. Bradford" <glbrad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:28:13 -0500
"Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:phineaspuddleduck-0A069A.00514815012007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <k9udnbuKb_FdUjfYnZ2dnUVZ_syunZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"G. L. Bradford" <glbrad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If a traveler matches the so-called expansion of the universe via his
own
acceleration in velocity (equivalence) the matched portion of the
expansion
will cease to exist as expansion (including the redshift ceasing to
exist)
since the traveler has equalized his own local frame to that particular
[then relatively inertialized] frame of universe.
Nonsensical.
To iron heads probably. But I've grown to realize there must be an
infinity of plains to "macro-universe" as well as an infinity of plains to
"micro-universe." Also that we can probably get relative, or gain
relativity, to each plain in turn. The measures of space-time are probably
self-similarly constant on each and every plain, but one plain vertically
relative to another plain, so to speak, is a different story. For example,
the curvature of an infinity of inner circles may be no different at all
than the curvature of an infinity of outer circles. You could expand,
inflate, or contract, deflate, any of the circles to overlay precisely any
other of the self-similar circles. Divide an inner circle into quarters, a
quarter could be expanded or contracted the same as the whole so to quarter
any other more outer or more inner self-similar circle. It, the same
principle, works the same for 3-d bubbles as for 2-d circles. It, the same
principle, should work for the 4-d equivalent of the 3-d equivalent, in
turn, of the 2-d. Presumably the same would apply to a 1-d length of line or
string.
Quanta dynamically, as I like to think of it, at a certain velocity a
certain curvature can be held to. Accelerate in velocity it won't be held
to. But the next curvature out can be held to at that increased velocity.
Another increase in velocity removes to yet another curvature outside the
previous curvature of circle, that can be held to. But ability to hold
velocity precisely to each curvature of circle in turn is the same as
drawing a straight line of countless points cutting straight through all the
countless outer and inner circles that -- like a single sweep hand --
geosynchronously sweeps around through the entire infinite self-similarity
of circle from a dimensionless infinitesimal dead center point.
In one arena of physics those points vary from each other considerably in
velocity. In another arena of physics they are doing exactly the same
velocity. In that same arena, there is also no tug either to the outside or
inside regarding each particular point within each particular outer or inner
curvature. In that same arena, since all velocity is in-line geosynchronous,
no point is moving, period, relative to any other point.
Now I make each 0-dimensional point speeding along in each outer and inner
curvature of circle a particularly tiny 1-dimensional length of string
occupying a particularly tiny set length of curvature of each particular
outer and inner circle but still speeding along the line of orbit of each
and every outer and inner curvature. Its same set length remains its same
set length (proportionately set in length to the length of the line of
circle) across the infinity of self-similar circles (across the infinity of
a very SINGULARLY SELF-SIMILAR CIRCLE). Relative to each more inner circle
it is expanded in its length in each outer more expansive length of line of
circle, or relative to each more outer circle it is contracted in its length
in each inner more contracted length of line of circle. But where none of
the circles are any different from any other of the circles -- where they
are all the same length of circle -- none of the strings are any different
from any other of the strings -- where they are all the same length of
string.
Back in the other arena, though, [variance] still rules over [invariance].
The situation is far more quanta dynamic than relativistic. In that arena,
much more will vary in both the bigger and smaller pictures than just
differential velocity increases or decreases (via acceleration or
deceleration) causing switches in differentiated plains of space-time. This
[equivalent] arena to the other is far more devoted to chaos. Far more
devoted to the 0-dimensional point (far more devoted to 0-dimensionality).
Different universes -- many universes [horizontal] -- rather than different
plains of THE ONE AND ONLY UNIVERSE [vertical]. The arena of the [not so
very self-similar] versus the arena of the [so very self-similar].
Yet they are equivalent. Between them, they have equivalence in common.
Starkly different pictures, starkly different arenas, starkly equivalent.
GLB
.
- References:
- "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
- From: Retnec
- Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
- From: G. L. Bradford
- Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
- Prev by Date: Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.
- Next by Date: Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real
- Previous by thread: Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
- Next by thread: Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
