Re: .Simple SR question...

On Jan 30, 10:32 am, asleep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dark Energy) wrote:
On 30 Jan 2007 08:11:44 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 30, 9:24 am, asleep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dark Energy) wrote:
What exactly is being _assumed_ in the one-way light
speed invariance case? ((The 2nd postulate case))

One-way light speed invariance. Doh!

PD

Do you mean experimental one-way light
speed invariance?


No, I do not. I mean *assumed* one-way light-speed invariance.

And in fact, the *assumed* one-way light-speed invariance is
consistent with both the experimental two-way light-speed invariance
and the experimental one-way and two-way light-speed isotropy, as well
as a host of other experimental implications such as time dilation and
frame-dependence of electric and magnetic fields.

PD

.