Re: .Simple SR question...

From: asleep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dark Energy)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:32:24 GMT

On 30 Jan 2007 08:11:44 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 30, 9:24 am, asleep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dark Energy) wrote:

What exactly is being _assumed_ in the one-way light
speed invariance case? ((The 2nd postulate case))

One-way light speed invariance. Doh!

PD

Do you mean experimental one-way light
speed invariance?

|DE|

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: .Simple SR question...
  - From: PD

References:
- .Simple SR question...
  - From: Jim Hutton
- Re: .Simple SR question...
  - From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: .Simple SR question...
  - From: Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...
  - From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: .Simple SR question...
  - From: Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...
  - From: PD
- Re: .Simple SR question...
  - From: Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...
  - From: PD

Prev by Date: Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
Next by Date: Re: Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.
Previous by thread: Re: .Simple SR question...
Next by thread: Re: .Simple SR question...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread