Re: Sorry, I've been having News Server Problems.

On Jan 29, 8:19 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On 29 Jan 2007 19:47:13 -0800, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Jan 29, 6:39 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On 29 Jan 2007 17:10:47 -0800, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 28, 8:22 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
That's right. My server has not been posting or receiving messages for three
days so I have reposted all of mine. Sorry about that.
In case you think I was running away from your questions, I wasn't.

The difference being what, exactly?

You are incapable of honestly discussing your theories, Henri. For
several years now I have asked you for the mathematical basis of your
theory - you have refused to provide it. Now Paul is asking the same
thing of you, and you keep dodging the request.

You are a dishonest man who has presented forged diplomas as evidence
of a physics education and excuses as to why you haven't actually
written any papers on the subject. Your standards of proof and
evidence are laughably bad - if you were not such an intellectual
hermit you would see the orders of magnitude difference between what
you call evidence and what the rest of the universe calls evidence.

You will, as before, insult me and ignore my points. I, as before,
will continue to be mystified as to why you are so arrogant. The
theories you claim as your own are whatever sound-bites you can think
of but not support [time has three subdimensions, space is
logarithmic, c+v, etc] and Newtonian mechanics. You will continue to,
as before, decry every experiment that _proves_ you wrong as
"unbelievable" as if someone who forges diplomas has any standing to
say such a thing much less be listened to.

Your ideas will be forever trapped on this newsgroup because you are
incapable or unwilling to actually write them down in a coherent way
that does not depend on asking you what they mean so they can be
published.

I wonder what non-response awaits me!

Yap yap!

This is what Henri Wilson has been reduced to - spouting off one
liners rather than respond to criticism.

How would I know it's criticism when I don't read your messages?

Which is why there *aren't* a dozen replies from you to me in the last
few days? Oh wait, there are.

Can't you even lie intelligently, Henri? Or does your stupidity affect
that as well?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Battle of Nitwits
    ... >>> Algis, you're asking a question I addressed at length within the last ... >> climbers too - in other words it was selection that did it. ... > as evidence. ... Whether or not they've received proper criticism ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Sorry, Ive been having News Server Problems.
    ... you call evidence and what the rest of the universe calls evidence. ... Yap yap! ... This is what Henri Wilson has been reduced to - spouting off one ... How would I know it's criticism when I don't read your messages? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Whom was the clever boy then?
    ... way would be by making seven independent paragraphs with the ... and the evidence in favour ... Why many "proto-ionisms" do exist in the Linear B tablets? ... been able to do such a criticism (The ONLY criticism made by ONE ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Whom was the clever boy then?
    ... way would be by making seven independent paragraphs with the ... and the evidence in favour ... Why many "proto-ionisms" do exist in the Linear B tablets? ... been able to do such a criticism (The ONLY criticism made by ONE ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Sorry, Ive been having News Server Problems.
    ... Your standards of proof and ... you call evidence and what the rest of the universe calls evidence. ... Yap yap! ... This is what Henri Wilson has been reduced to - spouting off one ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)