Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- From: "JanPB" <filmart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jan 2007 16:27:11 -0800
On Jan 30, 1:38 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 30, 8:20 am, "dlzc" <d...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear David Cross:
On Jan 29, 11:32 pm, David Cross <spam...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I've been away from these ngs for quite some time and I
had recently been wondering whether or not it was ever
shown that there can be nonconservation of parity in the
gravitational interaction.
Nothing yet. http:\\arxiv.org shows nothing close.
Unless it was in the satellite the Chinese destroyed. Or the test
masses are sitting on someone's desk seeing which one collects more
dust. ;>)
I bet the gravity probe B test masses would make pretty desk toys.
China? Gravity Probe B? I knew there was a connection: http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baoding_Balls
--
Jan Bielawski
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- References:
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- From: dlzc
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- Prev by Date: Re: tensor "reverse trace" operation?
- Next by Date: Re: SR theory is simplistic
- Previous by thread: Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- Next by thread: Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
