Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <dlzc@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:08:09 -0700
Dear JanPB:
"JanPB" <filmart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1170203231.706074.231250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 30, 1:38 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 30, 8:20 am, "dlzc" <d...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear David Cross:
On Jan 29, 11:32 pm, David Cross <spam...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I've been away from these ngs for quite some time and I
had recently been wondering whether or not it was ever
shown that there can be nonconservation of parity in the
gravitational interaction.
Nothing yet. http:\\arxiv.org shows nothing close.
Unless it was in the satellite the Chinese destroyed. Or
the test masses are sitting on someone's desk seeing
which one collects more dust. ;>)
I bet the gravity probe B test masses would make pretty
desk toys.
China? Gravity Probe B? I knew there was a connection:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baoding_Balls
In case you didn't know, "UA's" test masses got shipped to China.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/6a73a3d4188644d1
Had it been Japan:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Wa_balls
David A. Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- From: David Cross
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- References:
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- From: dlzc
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- From: JanPB
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- Prev by Date: Re: .Simple SR question...
- Next by Date: Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer)
- Previous by thread: Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- Next by thread: Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|