Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes

On Jan 31, 7:34 am, "harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotT...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Sue..." <suzysewns...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1170234677.277582.269340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Jan 31, 3:24 am, BernardZ <berna...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1170215267.502772.187...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
x...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says...

xxein: There is only one vantage point. The universe (and/or/if
beyond) exists. To assume anything more is to invent reason based on
nothing more than a wish.

There can be more then one vantage point, one observer sees a ball
coming towards him another sees if flying away from him.

The ball, from virtually one point in space.
sees two ~observers~ pulling fore and aft
and a matter filled universe pulling in all directions.
(~matter there influences inertia here, Mach)

According to Mach, matter *makes* inertia. However, no correctly working
model could be made based on his hypothesis.

<< Mach's stipulation is favoured in general relativity by the
circumstance that acceleration induction in accordance with
the gravitational field equations really exists, although of
such slight intensity that direct detection
by mechanical experiments is out of the question. >>
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/einstein-lecture.html

<< Small acceleration sensors placed at different locations
close to the spinning superconductor, which has to be accelerated
for the effect to be noticeable, recorded an acceleration field
outside the superconductor that appears to be produced by
gravitomagnetism. >>
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html

Sue...




Harald



http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/einstein-le...

Multiple EM observers *within* the ball see the same image
but by slighly different paths.
http://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/liquids/inddip.html
http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/Bizarre/GRAV.htm

http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html
http://www.research.ibm.com/grape/grape_ewald.htm

Sue...

--
If you are upset with my comments then some way you must care what I
think or with logic. Since it is unlikely to be me it must be logic.

Observations of Bernard - No 109- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation
    ... >the expansion of the earth, then we have a problem according to ... >of matter of thickness dr at a radius r < R. The outward acceleration ... >of a particle in this shell is of magnitude less than that at the ... us to view motion as velocity, and acceleration as ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
    ... and a matter filled universe pulling in all directions. ... According to Mach, matter *makes* inertia. ... << Small acceleration sensors placed at different locations ... close to the spinning superconductor, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?
    ... As if matter is still. ... > Introduce acceleration and the speed of light can vary. ... ANYWHERE NEAR PRECISELY HIS OWN VELOCITY! ... an apparent matter of time travel (apparent to him as the traveler)) and not ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?
    ... As if matter is still. ... > Introduce acceleration and the speed of light can vary. ... ANYWHERE NEAR PRECISELY HIS OWN VELOCITY! ... an apparent matter of time travel (apparent to him as the traveler)) and not ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Landing on a sloping runway with different wind velocities
    ... I'd say it has something to do with keeping acceleration in the equation so ... Oh well...doesn't really matter. ... arguing with the wind. ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)