Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: "Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jan 2007 08:13:11 -0800
On Jan 31, 9:35 am, "Dumbledore_" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Seven Seas Oscirius" <brightice2...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1170241411.319965.277710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 30, 6:02 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 30, 4:51 pm, "Dumbledore_" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/SRvNM.htm
Der alte Hexenmeister und Engineer
Androcles Dumbledore B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D.,
Headmaster, hogwarts.physics school for zauberlehrlings.
"One muggle's magic is another sorcerer's engineering"
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
I like how you don't even bother trying to have your arguments make
sense anymore.
You know you are insane, we know you are insane.
This repetition proves that *you* are insane.
Gisse's idea of sense:
"But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured in the stationary system, with the velocity c-v" ; "It follows, further, that the velocity of light c cannot be altered by composition with a velocity less than that of light." --Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955
Two different physical quantities, two different values. What's the
issue?
- Randy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: Dumbledore_
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- References:
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: Seven Seas Oscirius
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: Dumbledore_
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- Prev by Date: Is relativity relative?
- Next by Date: Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: The Psychosis of Relativity - Proven by Dork.
- Next by thread: Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|