Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: "Dumbledore_" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:49:24 GMT
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1170268148.665332.120450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 31, 11:23 am, "Dumbledore_" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1170259991.768929.80110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 31, 9:35 am, "Dumbledore_" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Seven Seas Oscirius" <brightice2...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1170241411.319965.277710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 30, 6:02 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 30, 4:51 pm, "Dumbledore_" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/SRvNM.htm
Der alte Hexenmeister und Engineer
Androcles Dumbledore B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D.,
Headmaster, hogwarts.physics school for zauberlehrlings.
"One muggle's magic is another sorcerer's engineering"
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
I like how you don't even bother trying to have your arguments make
sense anymore.
You know you are insane, we know you are insane.
This repetition proves that *you* are insane.
Gisse's idea of sense:
"But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured in the stationary system, with the velocity c-v" ; "It follows, further, that the velocity of light c cannot be altered by composition with a velocity less than that of light." --Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955
Two different physical quantities, two different values. What's the
issue?
HAHAHAHA!
One different physical quantity, the ray,
The ray is not a quantity.
You brought up quantity, fuckhead. You arseholes are
good at saying what things are not. What is a quantity, moron?
two single values, c and c-v.
For two separate values.
1. Speed of ray relative to observer, as measured in frame K: c
Wrong, fuckhead.
There is no "observer" in Einstein's statement, fuckhead, that's your
invention.
2. Speed of ray relative to observer, as measured in frame K': c
Wrong, fuckhead.
There is no K' frame in Einstein's statement, fuckhead, that's your
invention.
I'm not discussing Blind Poe's theory of relativity, you are moron.
.
- References:
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: Seven Seas Oscirius
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: Dumbledore_
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: Dumbledore_
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- Prev by Date: Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
- Next by Date: Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- Next by thread: Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
- Index(es):