sci.physics.relativity
- Is relativity relative?,
leosarasua
- Re: Article: Endless Universe Made Possible By New Model [MIME],
Sue...
- Re: = = = = = = = = = HAMMOND GOD BOOK,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: Why is Dumb ledore so Dumb?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes,
xxein
- Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes,
BernardZ
- Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes,
Sue...
- Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes,
harry
- Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes,
Sue...
- Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes,
harry
- Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes,
Sue...
- Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes,
harry
- Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes,
Sue...
- The Air - Anti-Gravity,
newstips6706
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Seven Seas Oscirius
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Dumbledore_
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Dumbledore_
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity - Proven by Dork.,
Dumbledore_
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Randy Poe
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Dumbledore_
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Randy Poe
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Dumbledore_
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The Psychosis of Relativity,
Seven Seas Oscirius
- Einstein S.O.L and mirror thought experiment?,
Quantum Ranger
- Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos,
dlzc
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos,
JanPB
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos,
David Cross
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos,
Dumbledore_
- Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- tensor "reverse trace" operation?,
Mike
- Some Idle musings whilst flicking through the Usenet Physics FAQ,
SCW
- The Human Skin as "An Engine",
newstips6706
- Re: if plank constants are wrong,
Eric Gisse
- Re: is time orthogonal on which axe?,
JanPB
- Re: einstein was right,
JanPB
- Re: why diffrent atoms like to stik together,
SCW
- Re: Sorry, I've been having News Server Problems.,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: ALERT: "TMG"----THE WHOI STALKER,
kk
Re: BAD NEWS FOR EINSTEIN'S CRIMINALS,
surrealistic-dream@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer),
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
The predictions of special relativity,
Phil Gardner
Making real gravity to prove unified field theory.,
reactor1967
The Hypergeometrical Hyperon Family,
ny2292000
About the Galilei principle of the relativity,
Stamenin
Re: (Evil) Google Groups 3 Beta is the Worst One Yet.,
Eric Gisse
Ping Tim, Spacetime Isotropy.,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: A black hole is a frozen supernova, not a frozen star.,
JanPB
Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
karandash2000
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
kenseto
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
karandash2000
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
kenseto
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
karandash2000
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
kenseto
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
karandash2000
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
kenseto
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
karandash2000
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
kenseto
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
karandash2000
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
kenseto
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
karandash2000
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
kenseto
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
karandash2000
- Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT,
kenseto
From image formation by a plane mirror to the generation of (human) visual consciousness,
mantaintai
Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
THE_ONE
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Dumbledore_
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Trevor Morris
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Trevor Morris
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Sue...
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Trevor Morris
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Sue...
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Trevor Morris
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
harry
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
THE_ONE
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Sue...
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
THE_ONE
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Sue...
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
THE_ONE
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Sue...
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
THE_ONE
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Sue...
- Re: Has the University of New South Wales, lost it.,
Dumbledore_
"Communicating at Translight Velocities",
Nigol
Re: The Sci.Physics FAQ assumes an unphysical, metaphysical notion.,
Eric Gisse
not yet answered questions,
beda pietanza
- Re: not yet answered questions,
vic
- Re: not yet answered questions,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: not yet answered questions,
Tom Roberts
- Re: not yet answered questions,
beda pietanza
- Re: not yet answered questions,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: not yet answered questions,
Tom Roberts
- Re: not yet answered questions,
dlzc
- Re: not yet answered questions,
beda pietanza
- Re: not yet answered questions,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: not yet answered questions,
beda pietanza
- Re: not yet answered questions,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: not yet answered questions,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: not yet answered questions,
Tom Roberts
- Re: not yet answered questions,
beda pietanza
- Re: not yet answered questions,
Autymn D. C.
Re: Your own personal black hole?,
Pmb
Message not availableRe: Your own personal black hole?,
Dumbledore_
Message not availableRe: Your own personal black hole?,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Your own personal black hole?,
Dumbledore_
Re: Your own personal black hole?,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: Your own personal black hole?,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Your own personal black hole?,
Dumbledore_
Re: Your own personal black hole?,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Your own personal black hole?,
Dumbledore_
Re: Your own personal black hole?,
Dumbledore_
Re: Your own personal black hole?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: Your own personal black hole?,
Autymn D. C.
Re: Your own personal black hole?,
Dumbledore_
"The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics",
Nigol
Any Relation between special theory of relativity and de broglie's wavelength?,
ANON.ymous
Photons as temporal standing waves.,
LEJ Brouwer
Re: massless phonons,
Peter Christensen
On reference frames in 4D space,
vps137
tensor question,
Mike
- Re: tensor question,
Pmb
- Re: tensor question,
Eric Gisse
- Re: tensor question,
shuba
- Re: tensor question,
Barry
- Re: tensor question,
Barry
- Re: tensor question,
Igor
- Re: tensor question,
Pmb
- Re: tensor question,
Igor
- Re: tensor question,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: tensor question,
Pmb
- Re: tensor question,
sal
- Re: tensor question,
Pmb
- Re: tensor question,
sal
- Re: tensor question,
Pmb
- Re: tensor question,
Barry
- Re: tensor question,
sal
- Re: tensor question,
Eric Gisse
- Re: tensor question,
Barry
- Re: tensor question,
Igor
- Re: tensor question,
Barry
- Re: tensor question,
Barry
- Re: tensor question,
Eric Gisse
- Re: tensor question,
Barry
- Re: tensor question,
Pmb
- Re: tensor question,
Barry
- Re: tensor question,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: tensor question,
Igor
- Re: tensor question,
sal
- Re: tensor question,
John C . Polasek
Re: Wrong deSitter space Penrose diagram - but idea still works,
Ace0f_5pades
Re: Which one is ewe?,
Ace0f_5pades
Re: the art of tensors,
JanPB
Brainiac science and the embankment/train thingy!,
John Kennaugh
Re: can relativity make lost teeth grow?,
Igor
Re: circular vision,
Dirk Van de moortel
Rotation is absolute,
sal
Question of Dark Matter and Dark Energy Solved - Dark Energy Comes From Life Intelligence and Patterns,
sidwiki.com
Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
David
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
harry
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
David
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
jem
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
David
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
karandash2000
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
Ace0f_5pades
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
Ace0f_5pades
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
jem
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
David
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
Tom S.
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
Dumbledore_
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
jem
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
David
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
sal
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
Tom S.
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
sal
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
jem
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
harry
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
sal
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
harry
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
sal
- Message not available
- Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity,
valls
Vector Visual 3D (PDS),
Peter Christensen
Re: the proof for ether is here,
Ace0f_5pades
Re: fuzzy electron clouds,
Tom Roberts
- Message not available
- Message not available
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: fuzzy electron clouds,
Igor
Re: The proof of mass vector.,
yen, ka-in
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
Ace0f_5pades
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
Ace0f_5pades
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
Ace0f_5pades
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
SCW
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
SCW
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
SCW
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
karandash2000
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
kenseto
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
karandash2000
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
kenseto
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
kenseto
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
kenseto
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
karandash2000
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
kenseto
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
YBM
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
karandash2000
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
kenseto
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
YBM
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
kenseto
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
karandash2000
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
kenseto
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
karandash2000
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
kenseto
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
karandash2000
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT),
YBM
Vacuum light speed,
valls
Re: Vacuum light speed,
Dumbledore_
Re: Vacuum light speed,
harry
Re: Vacuum light speed,
Martin Hogbin
Re: Vacuum light speed,
Paul B. Andersen
vacuum dragging,
beda pietanza
Re: Fatal error in Lorentz Ether Theory,
karandash2000
"The Einstein Hoax",
Nigol
Re: In their rare lucid moments, relativists admit that black holes do not exist,
Seven Seas Oscirius
Re: Article: Sending Einstein into a spin,
Ace0f_5pades
Hypergeometrical Standard Model and Cosmological Theory was published,
ny2292000
.Simple SR question...,
Jim Hutton
Re: .Simple SR question...,
Bill Hobba
Re: .Simple SR question...,
harry
Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
Re: .Simple SR question...,
Sue...
Re: .Simple SR question...,
Tom Roberts
Re: .Simple SR question...,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
harry
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
kenseto
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
karandash2000
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
PD
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
karandash2000
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
karandash2000
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
karandash2000
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
karandash2000
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
PD
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
PD
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
PD
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Eric Gisse
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
PD
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
kenseto
- Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dark Energy
Re: .Simple SR question...,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: .Simple SR question...,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
Efficient Engines - [ Engineering ],
newstips6706
Gravitomagnetism article in AJP,
Pmb
attn: aurilia - extremely fantabulous finances - vop dorze ig - (1/1),
alano
Magnet question,
sal
"Momentum" defined,
Pmb
Modern SpaceTime (ping Daryl).,
Ken S. Tucker
Need help deriving the relation between the RICCI and EINSTEIN tensors,
Psy-Kosh
"Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Nigol
Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
Re: GRAVITY AT SMALL DISTANCES,
Eric Gisse
Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Stamenin
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Stamenin
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Stamenin
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Dumbledore
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Stamenin
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Dumbledore_
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Stamenin
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PHILOSOPHERS WILL SAVE EINSTEIN'S FALSE SECOND POSTULATE,
Dumbledore_
Re: Why doesn't sound travel at the speed of light in solids?,
WillE1
Relative Time,
Quantum Ranger
"The Error in Relativistic Physics"</h2></b>,
Nigol
FYI - Einstein Articles(1906/1907),
Pmb
self-establishment prepare for The U-turn,
remixed
re:Global cooling - 65 storm-related deaths reported,
Action Jackson
Why is defended Einstein theory.,
Stamenin
Message not available
Message not availableRe: Why is defended Einstein theory.,
Eric Gisse
Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.,
carlip-nospam
Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.,
nabla
Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.,
Koobee Wublee
Message not available
Question about dark matter,
Jim D.
Message not availableRe: Question about dark matter,
PD
Message not availableRe: Question about dark matter,
PD
Message not availableRe: Question about dark matter,
PD
Message not availableRe: Question about dark matter,
PD
Message not availableRe: Question about dark matter,
Eric Gisse
Re: Question about dark matter,
davee
Re: Question about dark matter,
PD
"Is String Theory Justified?",
Slebal
Only One White Hole Per Universe?,
freeearthdotorg
Re: There is no physical length contraction in SR,
PD
"What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe",
Slebal
Re: Schwarzchild Limit Question,
mathematician
wrong relativity or simultaneity exists,
nabla
speed of expansion exceds speed of light,
nabla
what is faster,
nabla
SR and mass - simple question,
David
electron beam,
silent
What's with Gravity Probe B?,
f . kraut
Re: if two particles colides,
Igor
No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
WaveMechanic
- Re: No more please,
dlzc
- Re: No more please,
Eric Gisse
- Re: No more please,
Jerry
- Re: No more please,
bergeron
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
Eric Gisse
- Re: No more please,
bergeron
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
bergeron
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
bergeron
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
Eric Gisse
- Re: No more please,
karandash2000
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
karandash2000
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
karandash2000
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
Eric Gisse
- Re: No more please,
harry
- Re: No more please,
karandash2000
- Re: No more please,
Tom Roberts
- Re: No more please,
MathMagician
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
bergeron
- Re: No more please,
harry
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
bergeron
- Re: No more please,
bergeron
- Re: No more please,
Mike
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: No more please,
karandash2000
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
karandash2000
- Re: No more please,
Mike
- Re: No more please,
Pmb
- Re: No more please,
karandash2000
- Re: No more please,
karandash2000
- Re: No more please,
Mike
- Re: No more please,
karandash2000
- Re: No more please,
Eric Gisse
- Re: No more please,
Eric Gisse
- Re: No more please,
Mike
- Re: No more please,
Koobee Wublee
What Broke the Symmetry?,
Dark Energy
"The Properties of the Aether",
Slebal
A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR,
Mozart21
Re: the speed of light is not continuous,
Sue...
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: the speed of light is not continuous,
Igor
SR theory is simplistic,
John Kennaugh
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
WaveMechanic
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Igor
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
John Kennaugh
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Mike
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Mike
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Don Mortella
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Mike
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Don Mortella
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Mike
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Mike
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Don Mortella
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Don Mortella
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
MathMagician
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Mike
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
noshellswill
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
John Kennaugh
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Trevor Morris
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Bill Hobba
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Trevor Morris
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Bill Hobba
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Trevor Morris
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
bergeron
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
MathMagician
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
bergeron
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
bergeron
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
jem
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Igor
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
John Kennaugh
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Trevor Morris
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
bz
- Message not available
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
bz
Re: SR theory is simplistic,
PD
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
PD
Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
PD
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
PD
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
PD
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
PD
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
PD
Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Jerry
Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Dumbledore_
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
PD
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
bz
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
karandash2000
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
karandash2000
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
karandash2000
Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Dirk Van de moortel
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
karandash2000
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
karandash2000
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
karandash2000
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
karandash2000
Message not availableRe: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
Re: SR theory is simplistic,
John Kennaugh
Re: SR theory is simplistic,
bz
Re: SR theory is simplistic,
John Kennaugh
Re: SR theory is simplistic,
bz
Re: SR theory is simplistic,
Eric Gisse
Re: SR theory is simplistic,
bergeron
Re: what is an errorbar?,
Tom Roberts
RICHARD DAWKINS RESPONSE TO HAMMOND,
Gary Eickmeier
Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Message not available
- Re: massless photons,
Cosmik Debris
- Re: massless photons,
rambus2005
- Re: massless photons,
karandash2000
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
karandash2000
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
karandash2000
- Re: massless photons,
Eric Gisse
- Re: massless photons,
pmb
- Re: massless photons,
WaveMechanic
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
WaveMechanic
- Re: massless photons,
Eric Gisse
- Re: massless photons,
bergeron
- Message not available
- Re: massless photons,
Sue...
- Re: massless photons,
WaveMechanic
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Sue...
- Re: massless photons,
WaveMechanic
- Re: massless photons,
pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Sue...
- Re: massless photons,
WaveMechanic
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Sue...
- Re: massless photons,
WaveMechanic
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Sue...
- Re: massless photons,
WaveMechanic
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Igor
- Re: massless photons,
Peter Christensen
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Randy Poe
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Randy Poe
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Randy Poe
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Barry
- Re: massless photons,
Dumbledore_
- Re: massless photons,
Tom Roberts
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Peter Christensen
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Pmb
- Re: massless photons,
Peter Christensen
- Re: massless photons,
Peter Christensen
- Re: massless photons,
Tom Roberts
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: massless photons,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: massless photons,
Tom Roberts
- Re: massless photons,
PD
Re: what is yardtric,
Dirk Van de moortel
"Dimensional Analysis and Relativity",
Slebal
Re: The Number '1',
xxein
On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
JanPB
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
xxein
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Barry
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Barry
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
JanPB
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Barry
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
JanPB
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Igor
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Barry
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Igor
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Barry
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Igor
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
JanPB
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
JanPB
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
JanPB
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
JanPB
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
JanPB
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
JanPB
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
carlip-nospam
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
JanPB
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
carlip-nospam
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
carlip-nospam
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Tom Roberts
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
carlip-nospam
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
carlip-nospam
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
carlip-nospam
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
JanPB
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Tom Roberts
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
harry
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Tom Roberts
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
harry
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
carlip-nospam
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: On the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
Re: Why is the speed of light maximum and constant?,
xray4abc
"The Arrow of Time",
Slebal
Re: More questions on the LT,
PD
A simple thought experiment concerning Hawking radiation,
Matthias Plaue
Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Jim Black
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
sal
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Pmb
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Pmb
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Pmb
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Pmb
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Pmb
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
sal
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
sal
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
sal
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Pmb
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Pmb
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Pmb
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
sal
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Pmb
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
sal
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Pmb
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Pmb
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of Tensor Contraction,
Koobee Wublee
"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism",
Slebal
The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
JanPB
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
JanPB
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
JanPB
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
JanPB
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Mike
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Mike
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
JanPB
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
bergeron
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
bergeron
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
bergeron
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
bergeron
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
bergeron
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
bergeron
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
bergeron
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
JanPB
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
JanPB
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
pmb
- Re: The Absurd Claim of the Metric as a Tensor,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: TOM ROBERTS! I HAVE READ YOUR DERIVATION OF RELATIVITY! I SUPPORT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
Tom Roberts
"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations",
Retnec
An Announcement,
Me
Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
shuba
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
harry
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
harry
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Surfer
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
harry
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
harry
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
harry
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
harry
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
harry
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
karandash2000
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
shuba
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
harry
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
bergeron
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
harry
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
bergeron
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
harry
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Sue...
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
bergeron
Re: Brazil experiment detects absolute motion,
harry
Biggest crackpot became popular,
THE_ONE
Re: Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment,
shuba
Re: why is light visible,
Paul Cardinale
Message not availableRe: why is light visible,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Message not availableRe: why is light visible,
PD
Re: why is light visible,
My Tube
entropy and enthaphy, permeablity and permitivity, quantum reality.,
davee
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2",
Retnec
Definition of vector, 1-form and tensor,
Pmb
The Uncertainty Principle Is For Man/Not For The Infinite Intellect,
Symmetry Observer
The IRT transform equations,
kenseto
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
kenseto
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
kenseto
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
kenseto
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
kenseto
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
kenseto
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Message not available
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
kenseto
- Message not available
- Re: The IRT transform equations,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?,
shuba
TRANSFORMATIONS OF FORCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
borje
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1",
Retnec
Re: Minkowski Metric,
shuba
Re: The Unified Field Theory,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Virgin Mary and relativity mirrors,
It's a Miracle
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website",
Retnec
Constipated Eric Gisse,
Sorcerer Androcles
Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
David
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
jem
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
David
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
sal
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
David
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
sal
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
harry
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
sal
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
David
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
sal
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
David
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
David
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
harry
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
sal
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
harry
- Re: Water Trough - non-sensical SR result?,
harry
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie - a hotbed for crackpots/,
karandash2000
Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Andro
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
karandash2000
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
karandash2000
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
karandash2000
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
karandash2000
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
karandash2000
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
karandash2000
- Re: Newton's Second Law - a post-relaticvistic approach,
karandash2000
error in mathematics behind black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
dlzc
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
JanPB
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
shuba
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
erfc-1024
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
karandash2000
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
JanPB
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
karandash2000
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
JanPB
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
JanPB
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Tom Roberts
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Tom Roberts
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Ace0f_5pades
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Tom Roberts
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
cafeinst
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Tom Roberts
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Tom Roberts
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Eric Gisse
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
JanPB
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Juan R.
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
JanPB
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
JanPB
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Eric Gisse
Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Daryl McCullough
Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
Koobee Wublee
Here (Re: error in mathematics behind black holes),
Autymn D. C.
Message not available
Re: error in mathematics behind black holes,
cafeinst
Message not available
Relativity and Elliptic Space,
jan . verheul
"The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Retnec
Why these two absolute quantities are paradoxical?,
socratus
Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
jan . verheul
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
jan . verheul
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
shuba
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Mike
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
jan . verheul
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
jan . verheul
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
jan . verheul
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
jan . verheul
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
jan . verheul
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
jan . verheul
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
jan . verheul
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Pmb
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
karandash2000
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Sue...
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Can SR be Valid in Elliptic Space?,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
new math for TR - resubmission,
Kanuk
new math for TR - transformations,
Kanuk
Is this a joke?,
karandash2000
THE GENESIS. (for professors and children),
socratus
"The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity",
Retnec
Re: Was Einstein the first to publish E=gamma*m*c^2 ?,
Peter Christensen
Relativity Fact and Fiction,,
Bruce Harvey
More Word Salad,
Barry
- Re: More Word Salad,
karandash2000
- Re: More Word Salad,
sal
- Re: More Word Salad,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: More Word Salad,
Barry
- Re: More Word Salad,
karandash2000
- Re: More Word Salad,
Barry
- Re: More Word Salad,
karandash2000
- Re: More Word Salad,
Barry
- Re: More Word Salad,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: More Word Salad,
Barry
- Re: More Word Salad,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Word Salad,
Barry
- Re: More Word Salad,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Word Salad,
Barry
- Re: More Word Salad,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Word Salad,
Barry
- Re: More Word Salad,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Word Salad,
Barry
- Re: More Word Salad,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Word Salad,
Barry
- Re: More Word Salad,
rambus2005
This universe is a quantum computer:,
fitz
time travel unparadox,
Manuel
- Re: time travel unparadox,
PD
- Re: time travel unparadox,
Barry
- Re: time travel unparadox,
BernardZ
- Re: time travel unparadox,
Manuel
- Re: time travel unparadox,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: time travel unparadox,
Manuel
- Re: time travel unparadox,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: time travel unparadox,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Message not available
- Re: time travel unparadox,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Message not available
- Re: time travel unparadox,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Message not available
- Re: time travel unparadox,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: time travel unparadox,
Z 1 Y 0 N 3 X
- Re: time travel unparadox,
jem
- Re: time travel unparadox,
Sorcerer Androcles
"Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations",
Retnec
Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Wally Sewell
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
karandash2000
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Wally Sewell
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
karandash2000
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Wally Sewell
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Wally Sewell
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
sal
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
sal
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
dlzc
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
sal
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
dlzc
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
sal
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Wally Sewell
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
jan . verheul
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: Special Relativity in a Finite Universe - apparent paradox,
dlzc
Colloquium: Experimental Tests of SR,
Tom Roberts
Help with simple clock question,
David
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
harry
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
David
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
sal
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
sal
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
sal
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Andro
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
sal
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
sal
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Andro
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Andro
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
jem
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
jem
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
jem
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
sal
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
Andro
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
jem
- Re: Help with simple clock question,
bergeron
GR question,
Bruce Harvey
This universe is a quantum computer,
fitz
Before you post your "corrections to Einstein's SR" check the math...,
jambaugh
Space: Like a river,
Surfer
Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
- Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
JanPB
- Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
- Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Message not available
- Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
- Message not available
- Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
The_Man
- Message not available
- Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
karandash2000
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
karandash2000
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
karandash2000
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
karandash2000
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Randy Poe
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
karandash2000
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
karandash2000
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
karandash2000
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Randy Poe
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Stamenin
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Randy Poe
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Randy Poe
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
karandash2000
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
karandash2000
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
karandash2000
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Randy Poe
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Randy Poe
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Randy Poe
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Message not availableRe: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
PD
Re: Yet, another attemp by the cranks to determine what is real,
Mike
Do physicists understand physics?,
socratus
Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?,
sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?,
The_Man
Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?,
sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?,
The_Man
Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?,
PD
Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?,
karandash2000
Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?,
PD
Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?,
sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Is E=mc2 quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ?,
karandash2000
Re: Here's Another Force Question.,
Eric Gisse
Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Mike
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
karandash2000
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
sal
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
sal
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
sal
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
sal
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
sal
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
jem
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
jem
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Igor
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
bergeron
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Sorcerer
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
jambaugh
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
dej4
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
karandash2000
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
karandash2000
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
karandash2000
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
karandash2000
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
karandash2000
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
karandash2000
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Barry
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
sal
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
sal
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
WaveMechanic
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
karandash2000
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
karandash2000
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
karandash2000
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
bergeron
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
pmb
- Re: Second Postulate of SR,
Mike
Re: Why does SRT and LET have identical Math???,
shuba
Re: This Divine Creation: Without QM Fraud!,
MTwain
New math for TR,
kanuk
Re: Snipper Roberts wouldn't know his Arse from his Elbow.,
Paul B. Andersen
"Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?",
Weiv
Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?,
Dirk Van de moortel
More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: More Trivialities,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Bill Hobba
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Andro
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Andro
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Message not available
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: More Trivialities,
Pmb
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Pmb
- Re: More Trivialities,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
WaveMechanic
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
karandash2000
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
karandash2000
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
bergeron
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
bergeron
- Re: More Trivialities,
MathMagician
- Re: More Trivialities,
karandash2000
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Andro
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: More Trivialities,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
karandash2000
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
sal
- Re: More Trivialities,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Sorcerer
- Re: More Trivialities,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
bergeron
- Re: More Trivialities,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Barry
- Re: More Trivialities,
Pmb
Re: More Trivialities,
Sue...
using minus time to describe black hole,
the artist
About the inertial coordinate systems,
Stamenin
"Are Unified Field Theories Justified?",
Weiv
Where is my mistake in this classical Mechanical model?,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: 4-Momentum : How to handle non-elastic collisions ?,
Peter Christensen
Re: May the New Year bring new insight and Solutions,
Mike
"The Matter of "Dark Matter",
Weiv
Relativistic Clock corrections,
Sue...
Re: Time,
Sue...
Tucker, On Cooper Pair Photon Emission.,
Ken S. Tucker
black-body radiation,
Luca
Re: Shapiro Delay and the Solar System Galactic Motion,
Koobee Wublee
The "weight" of information,
Shepherd Moon
"Gravity",
Weiv
Lorentz transformation is not correct.Not correct is symetrical form intensity of moving charge.,
vlcek
Medium is not aether,
vlcek
Re: The differences between the Newtonian and the Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN,
vlcek
Re: AE, luce a non lucente,
Peri of Pera
Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.,
Stamenin
Re: Again and again about the result of MMX,
John Kennaugh
Message not available
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Again and again about the result of MMX,
Peri of Pera
Re: Again and again about the result of MMX,
Peri of Pera
Re: Again and again about the result of MMX,
vps137
Re: Again and again about the result of MMX,
harry
Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Forumodus of Halicarnassus
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Forumodus of Halicarnassus
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Forumodus of Halicarnassus
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Forumodus of Halicarnassus
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Forumodus of Halicarnassus
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Forumodus of Halicarnassus
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Forumodus of Halicarnassus
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to a Light Source,
Forumodus of Halicarnassus
A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Jan VR
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
William D. Walker
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
sal
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Jan VR
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Jan VR
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
sal
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
thomas . wai . wong
- Re: A Newton-like description of gravity, representing curved space-time.,
John C . Polasek
"Relativity and Reasonableness Tests",
Weiv
Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
karandash2000
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Sorcerer
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
karandash2000
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
karandash2000
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
karandash2000
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
jem
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
MathMagician
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
karandash2000
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dumbledore_
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dumbledore_
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
jem
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dumbledore_
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
jem
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dumbledore_
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
jem
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dumbledore_
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
jem
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
jem
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
jem
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
tomtom
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
stephen
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Dumbledore_
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
jem
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Sorcerer
- Re: A twin contraction paradox,
Sorcerer
Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity,
Koobee Wublee
Re: For Seto: Theories incompatible with relativity,
Tom Roberts
Even More Constructive Opining,
Barry
A New Year of Constructive Opining,
Barry
Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sue...
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
jem
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
bergeron
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
karandash2000
- Re: Frequency and invariance, some trivialities.,
Barry
GR: General Relativity or Great erroR?,
Juan R.
Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Sue...
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Barry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Barry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Barry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Surfer
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Barry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Surfer
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Surfer
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Barry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Barry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Barry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Barry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Barry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
harry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
harry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Van Flandern
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
carlip-nospam
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Pmb
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
carlip-nospam
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Pmb
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Sorcerer Androcles
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Van Flandern
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
WaveMechanic
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Van Flandern
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Russell
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
shuba
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Russell
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
WaveMechanic
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Pmb
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Van Flandern
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Wolfgang G. Gasser
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
G. Hobba
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Mike
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Mike
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Van Flandern
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Mike
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Van Flandern
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Van Flandern
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Theo Newburgh
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
G. Hobba
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
G. Hobba
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Van Flandern
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Russell
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Tom Roberts
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Russell
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
harry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
harry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
bergeron
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
harry
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
karandash2000
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Eric Gisse
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
- Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas',
Juan R.
Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sorcerer
- Re: simultaneity exists,
jambaugh
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sorcerer
- Re: simultaneity exists,
jambaugh
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sorcerer
- Re: simultaneity exists,
jambaugh
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sorcerer
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Spirit of Truth
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sorcerer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sorcerer
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
- Re: simultaneity exists,
Sue...
"Examining Mathematical Approaches",
Weiv
Re: Subconsciousness and Quantum theory. Is it possible?,
socratus
Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Juan R.
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Surfer
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Surfer
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Surfer
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Don Mortel
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Russell
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Russell
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Surfer
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
JanPB
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Question about analysis of Schwarzschild solution on Fo. of Phys. 1988, 18, 6,
Surfer
Curvature Cosmology,
David Crawford
Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
PD
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
PD
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
PD
Message not availableRe: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: A Physics Lesson for the Contributors to this NG,
Sorcerer
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
Jerry
Message not available
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Perihelion of Mercury question,
fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Philosophy : The Perspective of the Universe,
brad
Re: johnreed Catch 22,
Bill Hobba
Re: For Dr. Enders , spacetime.,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Steven Crothers being rebutted by a couple of grad students,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Is this serious?,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: Is this serious?,
jem
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is this serious?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Is this serious?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Is this serious?,
Spirit of Truth
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
Juan R.
- Re: Is this serious?,
pmb
- Re: Is this serious?,
xxein
Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
Pmb
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
Message not availableRe: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
Message not available
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
Sorcerer
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
- Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
Sorcerer
Re: A Hitchiker's Guide to FORCE.,
PD
