sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: EINSTEIN AND OTHERS DISPROVED
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Synchronization, simultanity, rest spaces and coordinate systems.
  • From: jt64
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: NE1 have new coordinates for non-singular event horizon?
  • From: Jim Hutton
• Re: PROOF OF GOD ==FLOWCHART==
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: PROOF OF GOD ==FLOWCHART==
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: PROOF OF GOD ==FLOWCHART==
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: PROOF OF GOD ==FLOWCHART==
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: bz
• Re: PROOF OF GOD ==FLOWCHART==
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: PROOF OF GOD ==FLOWCHART==
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: NE1 have new coordinates for non-singular event horizon?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: NE1 have new coordinates for non-singular event horizon?
  • From: jt64
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: kk
• NE1 have new coordinates for non-singular event horizon?
  • From: Jim Hutton
• Re: Validity of cartesian coordinate system
  • From: jt64
• Re: Does spacetime make your hair curl
  • From: jt64
• Re: Does spacetime make your hair curl
  • From: Igor
• Re: Validity of cartesian coordinate system
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: bz
• Re: PROOF OF GOD ==FLOWCHART==
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Validity of cartesian coordinate system
  • From: jt64
• Re: PROOF OF GOD ==FLOWCHART==
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Does spacetime make your hair curl
  • From: jt64
• Re: = IN GOD WE TRUST=
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Does spacetime make your hair curl
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Validity of cartesian coordinate system
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: Validity of cartesian coordinate system
  • From: jt64
• Re: Does spacetime make your hair curl
  • From: Igor
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Does spacetime make your hair curl
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Validity of cartesian coordinate system
  • From: jt64
• Re: Validity of cartesian coordinate system
  • From: jt64
• Re: 1000 points of light
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: 1000 points of light
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: 1000 points of light
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Validity of cartesian coordinate system
  • From: shuba
• Re: 1000 points of light
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Validity of cartesian coordinate system
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Validity of cartesian coordinate system
  • From: jt64
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Sue...
• Does spacetime make your hair curl
  • From: jt64
• Re: Kennedy
  • From: It's a Miracle
• 1000 points of light
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Kennedy
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: bz
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Thanks Hawking for the smile
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Tom Roberts
• They are coming to take me away AHA
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Validity of cartesian coordinate system
  • From: jt64
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: dlzc
• eEEEEEHHHH I'm lost again
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: anandsr21
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: jem
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Money
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• I don't know
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: bz
• I don't know
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Money
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Man we conquered the whole universe
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Jay Leno
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wheres MR Trailer trash?
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Your weak bitch and love is strong
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Could have had a V8!
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Wheres MR Trailer trash?
  • From: It's a Miracle
• I think you need the Van Campen lighthouse
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Your weak bitch and love is strong
  • From: It's a Miracle
• I have to be at work early to light and heat the Earth
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Denise I fell in love with another woman
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Cover up attempt
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Cover up attempt
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: bz
• Re: Cover up attempt
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Alrighty then!
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Joe
  • From: It's a Miracle
• I got it--Silly not stupid!
  • From: It's a Miracle
• oh yeah man thats hilarious Denise
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Lifes a bitch
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Victor
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Lifes a bitch
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Violence
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Neil Armstrong exposes Apollo Hoax
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Violence
  • From: It's a Miracle
• What good is love if it's corrupted by anarchy
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Violence
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time dilation and expanding space
  • From: Sue...
• OH MAN
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Vera
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Bring the Boys back Home denise
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Bring the Boys back Home denise
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Money
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: Bring the Boys back Home denise
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Bring the Boys back Home denise
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: kk
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: kk
• Re: Bring the Boys back Home denise
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Bring the Boys back Home denise
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: David
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Tisiv
• Re: Physicists not satisfied with the Axiomatization of Physics
  • From: surrealistic-dream@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Do you want to see a Big Bang in 3D... 4D... 5D... 6D... ?
  • From: Riton Riton Riton
• Re: big bang v. creation
  • From: Riton Riton Riton
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: kk
• SR invariance of lightspeed in vacuum still no symmetric wavefronts wacko?
  • From: jt64
• Re: big bang v. creation
  • From: PD
• Re: Absolutism of number flow from principle of relativity
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: dlzc
• Re: big bang v. creation
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: jem
• Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Absolutism of number flow from principle of relativity
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Absolutism of number flow from principle of relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Absolutism of number flow from principle of relativity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Absolutism of number flow from principle of relativity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Absolutism of number flow from principle of relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum gravity and mass in motion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum gravity and mass in motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Absolutism of number flow from principle of relativity
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Twins
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Absolutism of number flow from principle of relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Absolutism of number flow from principle of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Twins
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Absolutism of number flow from principle of relativity
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Twins
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Twins
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: Twins
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: jem
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: jem
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Yek
• Re: Defining mass using electrostatics?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: big bang v. creation
  • From: Baggage Check
• Quantum gravity and mass in motion
  • From: LeoVuyk
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: bz
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Valentine's day massacre
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: big bang v. creation
  • From: Zarkovic
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: bz
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: the universe is god
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: big bang v. creation
  • From: Dave
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: bz
• Re: the universe is god
  • From: Shubee
• Re: big bang v. creation
  • From: Dracnor
• Re: big bang v. creation
  • From: Dave
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: big bang v. creation
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: big bang v. creation
  • From: Shubee
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: kk
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: kk
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: David
• Re: big bang v. creation
  • From: Dave
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: bz
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: jem
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Reverse psychology
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: maybe thats it!
  • From: red pill
• 42
  • From: It's a Miracle
• maybe thats it!
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Ok Denise
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Androcles
• I don't know our future
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Keyhole Physics
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Keyhole Physics
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Professor solves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Keyhole Physics
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: I figured out the HOLY GRAIL that HAWKING WANTS
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Secant
• Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: I figured out the HOLY GRAIL that HAWKING WANTS
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I figured out the HOLY GRAIL that HAWKING WANTS
  • From: It's a Miracle
• To the Stalkerazi
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Evolution is a jail break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: carlip-nospam
• I figured out the HOLY GRAIL that HAWKING WANTS
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: loop definitions
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: bz
• Re: loop definitions
  • From: bottom
• Re: Petition:Inertial frames and distances
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Re: Petition:Inertial frames and distances
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• string theory
  • From: bottom
• Re: light, time and space
  • From: bottom
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: bottom
• Re: Petition:Inertial frames and distances
  • From: bottom
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• light, time and space
  • From: beda pietanza
• least action
  • From: bottom
• Re: loop definitions
  • From: t4rtye568
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: PD
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: kk
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: bz
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: bz
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: kk
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: kk
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Monte
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: kk
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: bz
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: PD
• Re: Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: David
• Lorentz' Considerations on Gravitation
  • From: d_hainz
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: David
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: bz
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: bz
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: kk
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Petition:Inertial frames and distances
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Petition:Inertial frames and distances
  • From: bz
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Yek
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Yek
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Petition:Inertial frames and distances
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Petition:Inertial frames and distances
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: LeoVuyk
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: bz
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: LeoVuyk
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Dallas Cowboys
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "It's a Miracle" & I are most definately tied to the same cosmi...
  • From: red pill
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Trajectory dependent trajectories?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "It's a Miracle" & I are most definately tied to the same cosmi...
  • From: 3773H51W
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: = IN GOD WE TRUST=
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: = IN GOD WE TRUST=
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
• Re: "It's a Miracle" & I are most definately tied to the same cosmi...
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: surrealistic-dream@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "It's a Miracle" & I are most definately tied to the same cosmic string.
  • From: 3773H51W
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: LeoVuyk
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Nearfield Electromagnetic Effects on Einstein Special Relativity
  • From: William
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Petition:Inertial frames and distances
  • From: jt64
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: LeoVuyk
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: = IN GOD WE TRUST=
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: shuba
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Secant
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: dlzc
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: harry
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: Richard Hachel
• What happened between Newton and Einstein?
  • From: montegueverona
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: Cyclops
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
  • From: LeoVuyk
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: jem
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: jem
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: harry
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Nonsense and SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: = IN GOD WE TRUST=
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Trajectory dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Trajectory dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Androcles
• Nonsense and SR
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Trajectory dependent trajectories?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GOD= G_uv = -k (%Brain Growth)
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: EINSTEINIANS STOPPED WORSHIPPING DIVINE ALBERT
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bz
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: PD
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Miracle Cures
  • From: dlzc
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Miracle Cures
  • From: jnadiaz@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: Igor
• Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: kk
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: Sue...
• Magnetism and SR - how is this explained
  • From: David
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Nearfield Electromagnetic Effects on Einstein Special Relativity
  • From: vern
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: jem
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: bz
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: harry
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bz
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Temporal Geometries
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Temporal Geometries
  • From: xxein
• Re: Temporal Geometries
  • From: xxein
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bz
• Re: THE SUBTLE FRAUD OF RELATIVITY
  • From: xxein
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: THE SUBTLE FRAUD OF RELATIVITY
  • From: xxein
• Re: THE SUBTLE FRAUD OF RELATIVITY
  • From: xxein
• Re: THE SUBTLE FRAUD OF RELATIVITY
  • From: xxein
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Barry
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: PD
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: loop definitions
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: dlzc
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: bz
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: bz
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Temporal Geometries
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Temporal Geometries
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Yek
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: bz
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: bz
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A twin contraction paradox (a la Tom Hollings)
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: A picture for [HAMMOND]
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: chris . hostuart
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: bz
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Reconcilation between Eastern Philosophy and Relativity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: bz
• Re: Reconcilation between Eastern Philosophy and Relativity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: shuba
• Re: Reconcilation between Eastern Philosophy and Relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: loop definitions
  • From: PD
• Re: higgs field !? why not ether?
  • From: PD
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: PD
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk33qVgCWmc
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Reconcilation between Eastern Philosophy and Relativity?
  • From: Sue...
• Reconcilation between Eastern Philosophy and Relativity?
  • From: Kedar
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: loop definitions
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Reptile
  • From: It's a Miracle
• PiG PIG PIGGY PIG
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Our Univer... See from outside...
  • From: Riton Riton Riton
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: basicly wrong
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: PD
• Re: higgs field !? why not ether?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: loop definitions
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: loop definitions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• loop definitions
  • From: tiny
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: tiny
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: jem
• circular rotation
  • From: tiny
• higgs field !? why not ether?
  • From: tiny
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Dda
• basicly wrong
  • From: Mucho Gr
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & Radar Ranging.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Purple haze: Excuse Me While I kiss the sky
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: frame-of-reference shift as a linear transformation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: frame-of-reference shift as a linear transformation?
  • From: bennett
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Defining mass using electrostatics?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Frame of reference.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: PD
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Relativity and GPS.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: jem
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: jem
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: frame-of-reference shift as a linear transformation?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Frame of reference.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Frame of reference.
  • From: kanuk
• Relativity and GPS.
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: frame-of-reference shift as a linear transformation?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: frame-of-reference shift as a linear transformation?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: frame-of-reference shift as a linear transformation?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: frame-of-reference shift as a linear transformation?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: frame-of-reference shift as a linear transformation?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: PD
• Re: frame-of-reference shift as a linear transformation?
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Defining mass using electrostatics?
  • From: Sue...
• The Algorithm of Virtual Machines AND Grid Computing, Virtual Machines & Internet Inefficiency
  • From: newstips6706
• Defining mass using electrostatics?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: PD
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: PD
• Re: frame-of-reference shift as a linear transformation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: PD
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: harry
• Re: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• frame-of-reference shift as a linear transformation?
  • From: bennett
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: bz
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: bz
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: YBM
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: jem
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: jem
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: jem
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: Z 1 Y 0 N 3 X
• Re: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: Z 1 Y 0 N 3 X
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: Esa Riihonen
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: shuba
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: harry
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: harry
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: harry
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
  • From: Esa Riihonen
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bz
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: YBM
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: PD
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: surrealistic-dream@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: harry
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: YBM
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bz
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: HOWTO Stop Thinking Like an Organic Machine
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: jem
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: jem
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• THAT SR, AND SCIENCE GENERALLY, MUST BE CONFORMED TO THE WORKING OF THE MIND
  • From: Alen
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: harry
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: harry
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: harry
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: shuba
• Organized Crime is a relativity mirror
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: Eli Botkin
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: theta . beta4
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: karandash2000
• ABOUT THE NEWTON AND EINSTEIN RELATIVITIES.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Confused Trolls
  • From: OG
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bz
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The Light Super Highway.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bz
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: PD
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: Igor
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: Articles:Papers: Do you want them?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: PD
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bz
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: shuba
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: dockiers
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ?E=Ac2?m , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Articles:Papers: Do you want them?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Programming in Machine Language using The Tertiary Numeral System [ 1 0 1 ]
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: PD
• "Gravity"
  • From: Dda
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bz
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: harry
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: jem
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: jem
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: hitman44
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ?E=Ac2?m , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: bennett
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: hitman44
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: harry
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: hitman44
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: hitman44
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: karandash2000
• E=mc2 is generalized to ΔE=Ac2Δm , details at www.ajayonline.us
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Programming in Machine Language using The Tertiary Numeral System [ 1 0 1 ]
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: Interferometry question.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: maxwell
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Interferometry question.
  • From: Den
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: OG
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: PD
• Gravity.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Russell
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: bz
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: PD
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: bz
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: dlzc
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: PD
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: PD
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bz
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: harry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Dda
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: jem
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: jem
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: bennett
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Alen
• Re: The Light Super Highway.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Alen
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Russell
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Some trolling assumptions of SR
  • From: shuba
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Theo Newburgh
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Confused Trolls
  • From: Androcles
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: YBM
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: shuba
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A thought experiment gone wrong.
  • From: eval . apply
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Ynam
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: maxwell
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: harry
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: harry
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: bennett
• if X observes a platform start moving, how can it appear contracted?
  • From: bennett
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: jem
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: Seven Seas Oscirius
• Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?
  • From: bennett
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: WAS EINSTEIN A DUNCE?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WAS EINSTEIN A DUNCE?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: PD
• Re: Did the nuts started as early as 1987 at Flinders University?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Did the nuts started as early as 1987 at Flinders University?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: Adam
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Androcles
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: shuba
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Theo Newburgh
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Randy Poe
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Ynam
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: jem
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Where is the science? GP-B
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: Sue...
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Theo Newburgh
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: Tom Roberts
• absolute simultaneity and SR time entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Theo Newburgh
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: jem
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: jem
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: WAS EINSTEIN A DUNCE?
  • From: THE_ONE
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Ynam
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: clock synchronization question for Sal
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: clock synchronization question for Sal
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: clock synchronization question for Sal
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: clock synchronization question for Sal
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The PICTURE LANGUAGE known as "Mathematics"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A thought experiment gone wrong.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: Adam
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: A thought experiment gone wrong.
  • From: eval . apply
• Re: A thought experiment gone wrong.
  • From: xxein
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: A thought experiment gone wrong.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Astronomy test of SR?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Astronomy test of SR?
  • From: David
• A thought experiment gone wrong.
  • From: eval . apply
• clock synchronization question for Sal
  • From: David
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: beda pietanza
• The PICTURE LANGUAGE known as "Mathematics"
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: anti-matter and black holes
  • From: It's a Miracle
• The theory of sociability
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: anti-matter and black holes
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: Modern SpaceTime.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: anti-matter and black holes
  • From: Igor
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: harry
• Re: Modern SpaceTime (ping Daryl).
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: hitman44
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: hitman44
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Modern SpaceTime (ping Daryl).
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: jem
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Ynam
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Joe M .
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: harry
• Re: CASEY BENNETTO CONFIRMS HAMMOND---Yep It's Lack of Brain Cells Or Latent Junk Genes
  • From: Z 1 Y 0 N 3 X
• Re: Modern SpaceTime (ping Daryl).
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Modern SpaceTime (ping Daryl).
  • From: Sue...
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: anti-matter and black holes
  • From: Adam
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: anti-matter and black holes
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: anti-matter and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: PD
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: PD
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: anti-matter and black holes
  • From: Adam
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Ynam
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Ynam
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: sal
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Bullion
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Queeg
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: harry
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Did the nuts started as early as 1987 at Flinders University?
  • From: JRK
• Re: On reference frames in 4D space
  • From: vps137
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: harry
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: PD
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Vector Visual 3D (PDS)
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: anti-matter and black holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: anti-matter and black holes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: anti-matter and black holes
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: anti-matter and black holes
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• anti-matter and black holes
  • From: Adam
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Rip Tide
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: THE GUILTY CONSCIENCE OF RUDOLF CLAUSIUS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: fpri
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: action at distance
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: karandash2000
• Special Relativity Directory - Everything Important
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: harry
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: Felix
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Seven Seas Oscirius
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: POINCARE, EINSTEIN, LENGTH CONTRACTION
  • From: Seven Seas Oscirius
• Re: ((فديو)) افضل واروع مشاهد حوادث الطائرات
  • From: Seven Seas Oscirius
• LIGO.
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Shithead
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: harry
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: CASEY BENNETTO CONFIRMS HAMMOND
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: fpri
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: dockiers
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: xxein
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: Pmb
• Re: General Relativity can only model an object who's inertia is very predictable.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: fpri
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Dumbledore
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: waiting for a answer
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• waiting for a answer
  • From: beda pietanza
• waiting for a answer
  • From: beda pietanza
• waiting for a answer
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: YBM
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ynam
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: PD
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: ZOMBIES AND HYPNOTISTS IN THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: My userContent.CSS ( for FireFox 2.0 ).
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: YBM
• Re: A new model of Grand Unified Theory (GUT) based on GR
  • From: YBM
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Einstein akbar
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: shuba
• Did the nuts started as early as 1987 at Flinders University?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can the theory of relativity explain WOMEN???
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: WAS EINSTEIN A DUNCE?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Mucho Gr
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: Jim_Greenfield
• Re: action at distance
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: PD
• Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: PD
• Re: Astronomy test of SR?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can the theory of relativity explain WOMEN???
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Can the theory of relativity explain WOMEN???
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can the theory of relativity explain WOMEN???
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Can the theory of relativity explain WOMEN???
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: PD
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: PD
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the theory of relativity explain WOMEN???
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Can the theory of relativity explain WOMEN???
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: BNP education policy
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Russell
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: tensor question
  • From: sal
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: MORAL SPECIAL RELATIVITIES
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: MORAL SPECIAL RELATIVITIES
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Astronomy test of SR?
  • From: harry
• Re: Astronomy test of SR?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Astronomy test of SR?
  • From: David
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: PD
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: PD
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Can the theory of relativity explain WOMEN???
  • From: Seven Seas Oscirius
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: socratus
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
  • From: Paradise_
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: harry
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: action at distance
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Sue...
• Re: simultaneity exists
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: tensor question
  • From: sal
• Re: WAS EINSTEIN A DUNCE?
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: A twin contraction paradox (a la Tom Hollings)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
  • From: Z 1 Y 0 N 3 X
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: life on sun
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: tensor question
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Measuring relativity with a clock & mirror
  • From: Pmb
• Re: life on sun
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Measuring relativity with a clock & mirror
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: life on sun
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: life on sun
  • From: WL
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: life on sun
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: life on sun
  • From: WL
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: life on sun
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: life on sun
  • From: WL
• Re: Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: life on sun
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Shubee
• Re: life on sun
  • From: WL
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: JanPB
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Pot or CrackPot ??
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: DOUBLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY (EINSTEINIANS KNOW NO LIMITS)
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: life on sun
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A twin contraction paradox (a la Tom Hollings)
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: DOUBLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY (EINSTEINIANS KNOW NO LIMITS)
  • From: Shubee
• Re: life on sun
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: massless photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Can the theory of relativity explain WOMEN???
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: of the false paradoxes
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: of the false paradoxes
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: of the false paradoxes
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: of the false paradoxes
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: of the false paradoxes
  • From: haiku
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Demra
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Can the theory of relativity explain WOMEN???
  • From: Mucho Gr
• Re: VAN DER MEULEN CONFIRMS HAMMOND
  • From: Mucho Gr
• action at distance
  • From: Mucho Gr
• life on sun
  • From: Mucho Grandiosuos
• Re: VAN DER MEULEN CONFIRMS HAMMOND
  • From: aa
• Mucho Grande confirms HAMMOND by a litle song
  • From: aa
• Mucho Grande confirms HAMMOND
  • From: aa
• Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Quantum theory from classical mechanics with time-reversing collisions.
  • From: PS
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum theory from classical mechanics with time-reversing collisions.
  • From: PS
• Re: Quantum theory from classical mechanics with time-reversing collisions.
  • From: PS
• Re: of the false paradoxes
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: JanPB
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: JanPB
• Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
  • From: JanPB
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Shubee
• Re: A twin contraction paradox (a la Tom Hollings)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Frequency of Helium neon laser light.
  • From: OG
• Re: of the false paradoxes
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Quantum theory from classical mechanics with time-reversing collisions.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Theo Newburgh
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Quantum theory from classical mechanics with time-reversing collisions.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Sue...
• Re: of the false paradoxes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: EINSTEINIANS AGAINST EINSTEIN'S SECOND POSTULATE
  • From: Shubee
• Re: of the false paradoxes
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: of the false paradoxes
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: PD
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Quantum theory from classical mechanics with time-reversing collisions.
  • From: PS
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• of the false paradoxes
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Demra
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Quantum theory from classical mechanics with time-reversing collisions.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: A twin contraction paradox (a la Tom Hollings)
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Frequency of Helium neon laser light.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: Frequency of Helium neon laser light.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: model for thought
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: jem
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: A twin contraction paradox (a la Tom Hollings)
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Frequency of Helium neon laser light.
  • From: Den
• Re: Frequency of Helium neon laser light.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Frequency of Helium neon laser light.
  • From: Jerry
• Frequency of Helium neon laser light.
  • From: Den
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Jerry
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GOD = THE 2ND CURVATURE OF SPACE
  • From: JanPB
• Re: for marlin: genuinely cool premium access - ezra eyru - (1/1)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• for marlin: genuinely cool premium access - ezra eyru - (1/1)
  • From: pearce
• Re: model for thought
  • From: xxein
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: HAMMOND=NEWLANDS-- PERSECUTION OF A SCIENTIST
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: fuzzy electron clouds
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: shuba
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Why is Dumb ledore so Dumb?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Spinoza, Einstein and Paradoxes
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: David
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: harry
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: bill . m . thomas
• Re: center of space
  • From: Barry
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Demra
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: davee
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: center of space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: center of space
  • From: Barry
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: center of space
  • From: PD
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Jerry
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• center of space
  • From: aa
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: karandash2000
• center of space
  • From: aa
• Re: fuzzy electron clouds
  • From: vic
• Re: Variation in density of emr wavelengths from data recorded in transits. (Roemer)
  • From: OG
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: Barry
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WAS EINSTEIN A DUNCE?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: WAS EINSTEIN A DUNCE?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: WAS EINSTEIN A DUNCE?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: tomtom
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: Dark Energy
• Re: Why is defended Einstein theory.
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: Some troubling assumptions of SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Your own personal black hole?
  • From: bz
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Demra
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: A twin contraction paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: davee
• Re: Grandfather Clocks and Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: On reference frames in 4D space
  • From: vps137
• Re: Is relativity a pseudotensor theory?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Modern SpaceTime & General Relativity.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Psychosis of Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: fuzzy electron clouds
  • From: PD
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Doubts about relativity 'dogmas'
  • From: Theo Newburgh
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity, Parity, Eotvos
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Question about dark matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on the LT and the Inverse LT
  • From: karandash2000
• The Operating System of Organic Machines
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: PD
• Re: WAS EINSTEIN A DUNCE?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: .Simple SR question...
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is relativity relative?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is relativity relative?
  • From: xxein
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Trevor Morris
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: not yet answered questions
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: Why is Dumb ledore so Dumb?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SRians, How Can You Claim SR is not LET in Disguise?
  • From: Dumbledore_
• Re: About the Galilei principle of the relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba