Re: .Simple SR question...

On 31 Jan 2007 19:09:51 -0800, "PD" wrote:

SNIP<

Since you obviously cannot comprehend the
simple meaning of the word "postulate" in
physics, let's try another route.

Special relativity requires light speed
invariance in all light speed experiments;
therefore, unless light's one-way speed*
is invariant, SR falls.

It is my claim that one-way light speed
invariance is not possible, even in
principle, much less experimentally, so
SR falls.

*(as described in detail previously)

|DE|

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lorentz on special relativity
    ... >hinges on invariance. ... Nobody cares about philosophical debates based ... I didn't say that special relativity was based on noether's theorem. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How science is not done
    ... invariance of the speed of light in different frames of reference. ... I think it was legitimate to doubt _that_ for quite a bit longer than ... And Special Relativity was very bold intellectually. ... Even after the Michaelson-Moreley experiment, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Proposal for an experiment to differentiate SRT from LET
    ... The theory of special relativity predicts invariance in the ... one-way (two-clock) light speed case, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)