Re: relativity: what if you can measure how far the light traveled?




"Alen" <alen1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1171327590.749727.43130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 13, 1:49 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Alen" <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1171288671.538626.223790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> I would discourage anyone trying to use the Minkowski diagram
> in an attempt to understand the answer to any paradox in SR
> conceptually, rather than purely mathematically, since the
> 4D spacetime geometric interpretation of SR does not make
> sense conceptually. There is a fundamental distinction between
> SR's transformation equations, and the spacetime interpretation.
> They are distinct topics, sufficiently to be seen as virtually
> distinct theories.

Where do you get that idea?
Do you think there is a discrepancy between the mathematical
tranformation and the way the transformation is represented
in a spacetime diagram?

[copy and followup to sci.physics.relativity]

Dirk Vdm

I don't say there is a purely mathematical discrepancy. I do
say that the 4D spacetime geometry goes far beyond what the
original transformation equations actually say. They refer only
to time dilation and foreshortening.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
This sounds familiar however, and so does your name.
Did some research...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/ad821ecfae8fe966
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/4e49faa71f1f5ff3
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f883198135a8304f
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/2289a77379d15ea9
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/5cd306bade2fd29e
and much more...
Ah well...
Apparently nothing has changed.

Dirk Vdm


They say nothing about
how this actually happens, and say nothing about something
like a 4D spacetime geometry. That is an interpretation imposed
on the equations. From a conceptual perspective, as
representing an underlying reality, as distinct from being
a purely mathematical representation, the 4D geometry
doesn't make sense.

Alen.

.



Relevant Pages