Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: "kenseto" <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:33:29 -0500
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:n93na4-og1.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In sci.physics.relativity, kensetomessage
<kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:14:49 -0500
<45d8cea3$0$5806$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:12dma4-t5v.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In sci.physics.relativity, kenseto
<kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:42:22 -0500
<45d86498$0$4881$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
The point is that I'm predicting the wavelengths (W(v)) and frequencies
(R(v)) using ad hoc notation, given the velocities. That's what a
theory *does*.
If you prefer I can restructure the problem so that I can predict the
velocity given wavelength and/or frequency.
In IRT relative velocity is predicted as follows:
Mean relative velocity = v = Lambda(Faa-Fab)
OR
Instantaneous relative velocity = v =Lambda(f_aa - f_ab)
OK. Hopefully I've defined sufficiently well my ad hoc notation W() and
R() for you. From section 3 of
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/2007IRT.pdf
f_aa is defined as "the instantaneous frequency measurement of a
standard light source in A's frame as measured by A".
f_ab = "the instantaneous frequency measurement of a standard
light source in B's frame as measured by A".
lambda = "the universal wave length". [*]
The interesting thing is that section 1 defines
F_aa = "The frequency of a standard light source in A's frame as
measured by A". [+]
F_ab = "The frequency of a standard light source in B's frame as
measured by A; if F_ab is not constant the mean value is used."
The sole difference is the word "instantaneous"; they are otherwise
identical. Are they? This quirk to me is a little weird.
But let's see how far I get.
No that's not the only difference. The other difference is: If Fab is not
constant a mean value for Fab is used.
The predicted velocity v_irt = Lambda * (F_aa - F_ab).
F_aa is a given, as is Lambda. F(SR)_ab, from SR's
predictions, is F_aa * sqrt(1-v/c)/sqrt(1+v/c)
and of course includes the Doppler effect.
For doppler effect according to SR:
f(SR)_ab = f(SR)_aa*sqrt[(1-v/c)/(1+v/c)]
And this is converted to IRT equation as follows:
f_ab = f_aa*sqrt[(Fab)/(2 Faa-Fab)]
Unfortunately, the paper stipulates F_ab = 1/gamma,
which is an interesting difference.
You are an idiot.
Fab/Faa = 1/gamma
How one can directly
measure this is far from clear, since v
is not initially known.
Sigh....the point is in IRT we don't use v, c or gamma in IRT equations to
predict anything.
v is replaced lambda(Faa-Fab); c is replaced by Faa*lambda; gamma is
replaced by Faa/Fab; and 1/gamma is replaced by Fab/Faa.
Also, c = Lambda * F_aa, as stated just below.
Therefore
v_irt/c = (F_aa - F_ab) / F_aa
= 1 - sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
I for one would hope that v_irt = v; clearly, however, this is not the
case. If one, for instance, substitutes v/c = 7/25 (to make the math
somewhat easy), one gets
v_irt/c = 1 - 24/25 = 1/25 != 7/25 = v
You are an idiot.....v_irt/c /= 1-24/25
There is no v_irt. There is v period.
The rest of your nonsense is snipped.
Ken Seto
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- References:
- The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: karandash2000
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: karandash2000
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: kenseto
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: dlzc
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: bz
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: kenseto
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: kenseto
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: kenseto
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: kenseto
- Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- Prev by Date: Re: WTF: Professor solves the twin paradox
- Next by Date: Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- Previous by thread: Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- Next by thread: Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|