Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Feb 2007 13:13:38 -0800
On Feb 20, 8:35 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 20, 5:22 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:....
I definitely do not understand it all, but the
symmetry suggested is that gravitation opposes
Power, by delta(g_00) = - delta(W_00).
I use the "delta" because the emission of radiation
is quantized to calculate Watts, IOW's there is no
such thing as a "differential" of Power, because I
think Power is quantized.
I think you need to gather up a bottle of these little "A"s
to satisfy your curiosity:http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/forces/isq.html
Sue...
Yes, I think, using the principle of conservation of
energy, the intensity of gravitational field is related
to the intensity of a light-bulb, I argue they're equal.
It's only calibration, they remain in cynk.
Bye-yhe
Ken
What do you guys think?
Ken- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- References:
- Re: Modern SpaceTime & Radar Ranging.
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
- From: Sue...
- Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
- From: Sue...
- Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
- From: Sue...
- Re: Modern SpaceTime & Radar Ranging.
- Prev by Date: Re: LIGO.
- Next by Date: Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
- Previous by thread: Re: Modern SpaceTime & Unified Field Theory.
- Next by thread: basicly wrong
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|