Re: big bang v. creation
- From: George Hammond <Nowhere1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:47:23 GMT
On 24 Feb 2007 07:01:20 -0800, "wine"
<f95fs29kl64f@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
what is the difference between big bang
and creation theory
[Hammond]
Simple:
"CREATION" Refers to the "creation of time itself" (past
present and future) with the advent of the human mind
(approx 100,000 years ago) which is the "creation of
reality", since without a (human) observer, there is no such
thing as reality, time, or the universe.
The "Big Bang" refers to the beginning of the Universe
within the existence of time itself and happened 14 billion
years ago "within time itself".
Hence we see that even though the Big Bang happened 14
billion years ago "within time", we see that "time itself"
is only 100,000 years old, hence the Creation which happened
100k years ago is "OLDER" than the Big Bang wehich happened
14 billion years ago.... or as it is sometimes expressed...
"God is older than the Big Bang".
By the way, you have to be "smart" to understand this... the
average stalkerazzi heckling Usenet amateur punk CANNOT
understand this, which is WHY they can't understand what
"God" is. You have to have an IQ over 130 to understand
what "God" is.
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
THEREFORE, we see that although
.
- Prev by Date: Re: LIGO.
- Next by Date: Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
- Previous by thread: Re: big bang v. creation
- Next by thread: Re: big bang v. creation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
