Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
- From: "Ace0f_5pades" <m4deep_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Feb 2007 03:33:15 -0800
On Feb 23, 11:12 pm, LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Name the last textbook that you worked from which required calculus or
higher to understand.
Dear Eric,
I realize that it is hard to understand, that life is different than
you have always been told.
That Math is the only way!!
It is a mistake to believe that there is a calculus required to
understand the evolution of the universe down to the Plank scale or
consciousness. see my site!!!
First there is the imagination how the universe could work, then comes
the mathematics or expriments in, for falsification..
I apologise Leo.
I've done a lot more research recently and I'm taking a quick break to
do this. During my research I discovered that economy of scale is
nothing-new -regarding computers, It's the approaches and resolutions
that are new (it a language thing, in my native tongue, a few words
carry a vast amount of meaning). You're right, in a sense, but I
would say Math is the great way, especially when our planet depends on
it.
Also, I want to bring to your attention the recent documentary I saw
regarding Global Warming (I didn't find the link to the documentary.
An English dude made it). Over in Bengal, just before the tidal wave
hit, the sea had claimed 8 km of inshore land. The North Pole has
lost over 40% of its ice this year in comparison to last year.
Gerheidt Bert (not sure of spelling) whom wrote the economic costs
effect of Global warming document that caused quite the stir
internationally, says its no longer a theory, its a fact. You only
have to look around and we all know its true. Those with much to lose
financially are the ones offering the most resistance, and even the
CEO (Lord Oxborough I believe) of Shell Oil was brave enough to show
his face in support of the fact that global warming is now a fact! He
also argues that it should be the government that pays for it? -
rather than the companies that profiteered of it for so long.
But over 40% loss of thickness? We all know what happens to a
magnetic field in extreme cold. what will happen when the caps go
completely. Will the increase field draws us closer to the sun? Are
we in for double whammy effects?
He was talking about Nuclear power being the only Carbon emission free
solution, though it's dangerous. He was reluctant to admit the need,
and with England shutting off their stations, it can only bring
trouble. They don't have any solutions for replacement.
There's no stopping it, our combined-global carving and seek for power
is increasing with economies such as India, China, not to mention our
own countries need for growth, though New Zealand can proudly say we
ratified the Kyoto agreement. USA are a poor example of leadership.
Off in other countries affairs, while the real monster sneaks up from
behind to sting the entire planet for its arrogance.
The effect of the polar cap melting, while the planetary dipole
moments increasing predicted strength is the real worry. The point of
no return pass about 4 years ago, we are going to pay for it.
.
- References:
- Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
- From: LeoVuyk
- Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
- From: LeoVuyk
- Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
- From: LeoVuyk
- Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
- From: LeoVuyk
- Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
- Prev by Date: Re: Do light have velocity dependent trajectories?
- Next by Date: Re: What happened between Newton and Einstein?
- Previous by thread: Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
- Next by thread: Re: Some relativity aspects of new physics and astronomy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|