Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
- From: John Kennaugh <JKNG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:46:53 +0000
bz wrote:
John Kennaugh <JKNG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:ol4IxUFUTD4FFw4I@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
http://ej.iop.org/links/rZvSHLmVv/gBy-u3DD2xGKctveav5vpA/r706r1.pdf
may give you some references with which to start your journey of discovery.
Your link didn't work when I tried it. It is of passing interest at the
moment due to lack of time. May look into it later.
google for r706r1.pdf, the link I used to get to the document may not be
available from off campus.
One hit. A site which offered to sell me a copy for $10
Rep. Prog. Phys. 60 (1997) 615–688. Printed in the UK. PII: S0034-4885(97)
68404-3. Ring-laser tests of fundamental physics and geophysics. G E Stedman
www.iop.org/EJ/article/0034-4885/60/6/001/r706r1.pdf
--
John Kennaugh
.
- References:
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: bz
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: bz
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: bz
- Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
- From: bz
- Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
- From: bz
- Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
- From: bz
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- Prev by Date: Re: Absolutism of number flow from principle of relativity
- Next by Date: Re: SR theory is simplistic
- Previous by thread: Re: Sagnac was SR theory is simplistic
- Next by thread: Re: SR theory is simplistic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|