sci.physics.relativity

• Date Index

---

• one single photon generation, beda pietanza
  • Re: one single photon generation, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • Re: one single photon generation, Androcles
  • Re: one single photon generation, Sue...
  • Re: one single photon generation, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Michelson-Morley, ca314159
  • Re: Michelson-Morley, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Michelson-Morley, Androcles
    • Re: Michelson-Morley, Pentcho Valev
  • Re: Michelson-Morley, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Michelson-Morley, Androcles
  • Re: Michelson-Morley, Androcles
• Re: Lambda-CDM models the _ known _ universe., John C . Polasek
  • Re: Lambda-CDM models the _ known _ universe., Androcles
• How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync ., oriel36
  • Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync ., Jeckyl
• question about FTL equation, Raghar
  • Re: question about FTL equation, Androcles
    • Re: question about FTL equation, Raghar
      • Re: question about FTL equation, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: question about FTL equation, Androcles
  • Re: question about FTL equation, Igor
  • Re: question about FTL equation, Bill Hobba
    • Re: question about FTL equation, Raghar
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Daor
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics", Daor
• stationary waves and quantum phenomena, beda pietanza
• NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM ., socratus
  • Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM ., Sue...
    • Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM ., socratus
      • Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM ., Sue...
  • Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM ., Frank Naypaver
    • Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM ., socratus
• Neophyte question., Dave Reckoning
  • Re: Neophyte question., Androcles
    • Re: Neophyte question., Dave Reckoning
      • Re: Neophyte question., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Neophyte question., Dave Reckoning
      • Re: Neophyte question., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Neophyte question., harry
      • Re: Neophyte question., Androcles
      • Re: Neophyte question., Androcles
  • Re: Neophyte question., harry
    • Re: Neophyte question., oriel36
  • Re: Neophyte question., Bill Hobba
  • Re: Neophyte question., Dave Reckoning
    • Re: Neophyte question., Androcles
    • Re: Neophyte question., shuba
• I got the transformation wrong, partso2
  • Re: I got the transformation wrong, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can computer work using light instead of chips., Michael A. Terrell
• Re: ((( WARNING ))) Pass it on if you have the courage. †, xxein
• New Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider experiment and a Mathematical challenge, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: New Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider experiment and a Mathematical challenge, Eric Gisse
    • Re: New Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider experiment and a Mathematical challenge, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: New Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider experiment and a Mathematical challenge, Eric Gisse
      • Re: New Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider experiment and a Mathematical challenge, xxein
• "Is String Theory Justified?", Daor
• Can Light quata to stop its moving?, socratus
  • Re: Can Light quata to stop its moving?, Randy Poe
  • Re: Can Light quata to stop its moving?, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Can Light quata to stop its moving?, Curious
    • Re: Can Light quata to stop its moving?, socratus
      • Re: Can Light quata to stop its moving?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Can Light quata to stop its moving?, socratus
• Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe", Daor
• Destroying Hell, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Destroying Hell, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Putting out Hell, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Putting out Hell, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• On the GP-B & LIGO, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Eric Gisse
    • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Eric Gisse
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, cmaj10
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, cmaj10
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Eric Gisse
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, cmaj10
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Eric Gisse
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, JanPB
    • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Eric Gisse
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, Eric Gisse
  • Re: On the GP-B & LIGO, karandash2000
• Fractal Scientist, It's a Miracle
• Velocity, vertvergon
  • Re: Velocity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Velocity, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Velocity, vertvergon
      • Re: Velocity, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Velocity, harry
      • Re: Velocity, vertvergon
      • Re: Velocity, harry
      • Re: Velocity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Velocity, vertvergon
  • Re: Velocity, xxein
    • Re: Velocity, vertvergon
      • Re: Velocity, xxein
      • Re: Velocity, harry
  • Re: Velocity, Sue...
    • Re: Velocity, xxein
      • Re: Velocity, Sue...
  • Re: Velocity, Lombago Major Tours
  • Re: Velocity, harry
    • Re: Velocity, vertvergon
      • Re: Velocity, harry
      • Re: Velocity, vertvergon
      • Re: Velocity, harry
  • Re: Velocity, PD
• "The Properties of the Aether", Tahc
• Relativistic model of interfering entities, Ivan
  • Re: Relativistic model of interfering entities, Androcles
• Relativistiv model of interfering entities, Ivan
• Re: More questions on non-electric magnetism. [was Re: Is non-elect..., It's a Miracle
• What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, jt64
  • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, jt64
  • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, jt64
      • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, jt64
      • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, Igor
      • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, jt64
      • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, jt64
      • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, jt64
      • Re: What event happen first of two simultaneous events within SR, jt64
• Well jobs comes and goes don't they..., jt64
• Re: Is non-electric magnetism -- excluding magnetic monopoles -- po..., It's a Miracle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is non-electric magnetism -- excluding magnetic monopoles -- po..., It's a Miracle
  • Re: Is non-electric magnetism -- excluding magnetic monopoles -- po..., It's a Miracle
    • Re: Is non-electric magnetism -- excluding magnetic monopoles -- po..., It's a Miracle
    • Re: Is non-electric magnetism -- excluding magnetic monopoles -- po..., It's a Miracle
• The difference between me and Christ, It's a Miracle
• Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS UNDERSTAND SCIENCE, It's a Miracle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS UNDERSTAND SCIENCE, It's a Miracle
  • Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS UNDERSTAND SCIENCE, It's a Miracle
• The secret of the Twin Paradox exposed, Spirit of Truth
  • Re: The secret of the Twin Paradox exposed, Androcles
  • Re: The secret of the Twin Paradox exposed, josefmatz
    • Re: The secret of the Twin Paradox exposed, Me
  • Re: The secret of the Twin Paradox exposed, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: The secret of the Twin Paradox exposed, Igor
    • Re: The secret of the Twin Paradox exposed, Androcles
    • Re: The secret of the Twin Paradox exposed, Spirit of Truth
      • Re: The secret of the Twin Paradox exposed, Igor
• Cat music, It's a Miracle
• Little devils, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Little devils, It's a Miracle
• you got too!, davee
  • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
  • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
    • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
    • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
    • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
  • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
  • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
  • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
  • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
  • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
    • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: you got too!, It's a Miracle
  • Re: you got too!, The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Massachusetts RCN.com ABUSE COMPLAINT FILED --> 209.6.113.12, It's a Miracle
• Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, jt64
  • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, jt64
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, jt64
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, jt64
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, jt64
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, jt64
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, jt64
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, jt64
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, jt64
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Simultan events within the bubble of SR can take place pretty much anywhere in space, jt64
• Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, It's a Miracle
  • Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, It's a Miracle
    • Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, George Hammond
      • Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, YBM
      • Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, ABUSE COMPLAINT
    • Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, ABUSE COMPLAINT
      • Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, It's a Miracle
      • Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, ABUSE COMPLAINT
      • Message not available
      • Re: ABUSE COMPLAINT (was: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?), ABUSE COMPLAINT
      • Message not available
      • Re: ABUSE COMPLAINT (was: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?), George Hammond
  • Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, It's a Miracle
    • Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, ABUSE COMPLAINT
  • Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, George Hammond
  • Re: IS THE SEPHIROT THE TESSERACT?, ABUSE COMPLAINT
• Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
  • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, Randy Poe
    • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, harry
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, Randy Poe
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
  • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, Androcles
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, jt64
      • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Simultaneous moments within SR, Sue...
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Tahc
• twins versus quanta collapse, beda pietanza
  • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, beda pietanza
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, It's a Miracle
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, Bill Hobba
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, funk420
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, beda pietanza
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, beda pietanza
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, beda pietanza
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, Jeckyl
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, beda pietanza
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, beda pietanza
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, beda pietanza
      • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: twins versus quanta collapse, Douglas Eagleson
• Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
    • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, ABUSE COMPLAINT
  • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
    • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, ABUSE COMPLAINT
  • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
    • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, ABUSE COMPLAINT
  • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
    • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, ABUSE COMPLAINT
  • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
    • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, ABUSE COMPLAINT
  • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
    • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, ABUSE COMPLAINT
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, ABUSE COMPLAINT
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, ABUSE COMPLAINT
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, ABUSE COMPLAINT
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, ABUSE COMPLAINT
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, It's a Miracle
      • Re: SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE TRINITY, ABUSE COMPLAINT
• transformation equations, rbwinn
  • Re: transformation equations, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
  • Re: transformation equations, Shubee
    • Re: transformation equations, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Shubee
      • Re: transformation equations, Androcles
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Shubee
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Shubee
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Shubee
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
    • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
    • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
    • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
  • Re: transformation equations, Tom Roberts
    • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Tom Roberts
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, YBM
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
    • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
    • Re: transformation equations, Spirit of Truth
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
  • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
    • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
  • Re: transformation equations, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
    • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
  • Re: transformation equations, Androcles
    • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Androcles
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Androcles
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Androcles
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Androcles
    • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
  • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
    • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
    • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, Jeckyl
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
      • Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
      • Re: transformation equations, karandash2000
• animations and video lectures on Physics, AK444
• Re: Question about Maxwell's Equations, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Question about Maxwell's Equations, Me
• Re: A twin contraction paradox (a la Tom Hollings), Ben Bean
• "The Arrow of Time", Tahc
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• smoothly from absolute to relative and viceversa, beda pietanza
  • Re: smoothly from absolute to relative and viceversa, Tom Roberts
    • Re: smoothly from absolute to relative and viceversa, Tom Roberts
    • Re: smoothly from absolute to relative and viceversa, beda pietanza
  • Re: smoothly from absolute to relative and viceversa, Ben Bean
    • Re: smoothly from absolute to relative and viceversa, Ben Bean
• Plutonium, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Plutonium, Me
• Shubee, It's a Miracle
• Evil heaven and Judgement Day, It's a Miracle
• Re: Andro --> Einstein <-- Wabbie, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Andro --> Einstein <-- Wabbie, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• This is nuts, It's a Miracle
  • Re: This is nuts, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Can an Infinte Universe be Ruled Out?, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Can an Infinte Universe be Ruled Out?, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Can an Infinte Universe be Ruled Out?, It's a Miracle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can an Infinte Universe be Ruled Out?, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Can an Infinte Universe be Ruled Out?, It's a Miracle
• Maybe a clue, It's a Miracle
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Tahc
• Re: The logic start of a CPT symmetric ENTANGLED Multiverse Inflation, Eric Gisse
  • Re: The logic start of a CPT symmetric ENTANGLED Multiverse Inflation, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• ANNOUNCE: Moderated group has been formed, shuba
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: Moderated group has been formed, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• two slit questions for experiment experts, beda pietanza
  • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, Bill Hobba
    • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, beda pietanza
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, Bill Hobba
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, harry
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, Bill Hobba
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, beda pietanza
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, harry
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, harry
  • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, beda pietanza
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, PD
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, beda pietanza
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, Bill Hobba
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, beda pietanza
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, Bill Hobba
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, beda pietanza
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, beda pietanza
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, beda pietanza
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, PD
  • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, PD
    • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: two slit questions for experiment experts, PD
• Physics question, It's a Miracle
• Physics problem, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Physics problem, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Physics problem, It's a Miracle
    • Re: Physics problem, It's a Miracle
• King of Atlantis, It's a Miracle
  • Re: King of Atlantis, It's a Miracle
    • Re: King of Atlantis, It's a Miracle
      • Re: King of Atlantis, It's a Miracle
    • Re: King of Atlantis, It's a Miracle
      • Re: King of Atlantis, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
    • Re: King of Atlantis, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Rebuilding LIGO someday?, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: Rebuilding LIGO someday?, Tom Roberts
• collection of ideas on relativity, blochee
  • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Sue...
    • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Get Smart
      • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Sue...
      • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Get Smart
      • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Sue...
      • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Get Smart
      • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Sue...
      • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Get Smart
      • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Sue...
      • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Get Smart
      • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Get Smart
  • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Androcles
  • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, Bill Hobba
  • Re: collection of ideas on relativity, karandash2000
• Einstein's 1905 Paper, Alen
  • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Shubee
    • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, YBM
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Shubee
    • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
    • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Androcles
  • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
    • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Alen
  • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
    • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Shubee
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Shubee
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Shubee
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, YBM
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Alen
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Alen
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, YBM
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, jem
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, YBM
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Shubee
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, YBM
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Shubee
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, YBM
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Shubee
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, YBM
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Shubee
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, YBM
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
    • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Alen
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Alen
  • Re: Einstein's 1905 Paper, Sue...
• Re: RELATIVISTS ASK WHO KILLED PHYSICS, surrealistic-dream@xxxxxxxxxxx
• How speed of light and newtonian gravity leads to GR?, M.E
  • Re: How speed of light and newtonian gravity leads to GR?, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • Re: How speed of light and newtonian gravity leads to GR?, Igor
    • Re: How speed of light and newtonian gravity leads to GR?, M.E
      • Re: How speed of light and newtonian gravity leads to GR?, Igor
      • Re: How speed of light and newtonian gravity leads to GR?, M.E
  • Re: How speed of light and newtonian gravity leads to GR?, carlip-nospam
    • Re: How speed of light and newtonian gravity leads to GR?, M.E
      • Re: How speed of light and newtonian gravity leads to GR?, carlip-nospam
  • Re: How speed of light and newtonian gravity leads to GR?, fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How speed of light and newtonian gravity leads to GR?, d_hainz
• General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, akhila raman
  • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Eric Gisse
    • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, akhila raman
      • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Androcles
      • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Bill Hobba
      • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Eric Gisse
  • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, karandash2000
    • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Eric Gisse
  • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Bill Hobba
    • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Bill Hobba
      • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Eric Gisse
      • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Bill Hobba
      • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Bill Hobba
  • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Androcles
    • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: General Relativity question by Akhila Raman, OG
• Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, greysky
  • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Stress-energy tensor of a black hole?, Ken S. Tucker
• Modern SpaceTime (MST) annoucement., Ken S. Tucker
• Time Travel, Pitch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Time travel, Pitch
    • Re: Time travel, Pitch
    • Re: Time travel, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: Time travel, Pitch
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Suriv
• Re: Looking For Engineering Job?, Seven Seas Oscirius
• Well I got a better idea of whats going on, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Well I got a better idea of whats going on, Seven Seas Oscirius
  • Re: Well I got a better idea of whats going on, Seven Seas Oscirius
• Re: Relativity & The Duel Reality Principles, It's a Miracle
• Johnny and Linda, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Johnny and Linda, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
    • Re: Johnny and Linda, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Johnny and Linda, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• I'm a train robber baby!, It's a Miracle
  • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, It's a Miracle
    • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
      • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, It's a Miracle
      • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, It's a Miracle
    • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • Re: I'm a train robber baby!, Seven Seas Oscirius
• Daddy has flown across the ocean, It's a Miracle
• I'll see you on the Dark Side Of The Moon!, It's a Miracle
  • Re: I'll see you on the Dark Side Of The Moon!, Seven Seas Oscirius
• DAve What iS santa CLAWS Doing TO ME?, It's a Miracle
• You know people, It's a Miracle
  • Re: You know people, The Ghost In The Machine
• Whats in those trains, Man, It's a Miracle
• What is a service economy exactly?, It's a Miracle
• Nuclear winter, It's a Miracle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Nuclear Winter, It's a Miracle
  • Nuclear Winter, It's a Miracle
• How do you make wire?, It's a Miracle
• Relativity of trains---Nuclear winter, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Relativity of trains---Nuclear winter, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• E=MC2, It's a Miracle
  • Re: E=MC2, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
  • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, karandash2000
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, Androcles
    • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, Androcles
  • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
  • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, xxein
    • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, karandash2000
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, karandash2000
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, karandash2000
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, valls
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, karandash2000
      • Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity, karandash2000
• Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
  • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, valls
    • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Androcles
    • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
    • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
  • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, YBM
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, YBM
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, YBM
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, PD
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, PD
  • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
    • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Russell
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, PD
  • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, mluttgens
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, PD
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment, karandash2000
• The lightpaths again..., jt64
  • Re: The lightpaths again..., jt64
    • Re: The lightpaths again..., jt64
      • Re: The lightpaths again..., jt64
    • Re: The lightpaths again..., jt64
    • Re: The lightpaths again..., jt64
      • Re: The lightpaths again..., jt64
• Re: THE SMELL OF DEAD SCIENCE, It's a Miracle
  • Re: THE SMELL OF DEAD SCIENCE, It's a Miracle
    • Re: THE SMELL OF DEAD SCIENCE, It's a Miracle
      • Re: THE SMELL OF DEAD SCIENCE, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: THE SMELL OF DEAD SCIENCE, It's a Miracle
  • Re: THE SMELL OF DEAD SCIENCE, It's a Miracle
  • Re: THE SMELL OF DEAD SCIENCE, It's a Miracle
  • Re: THE SMELL OF DEAD SCIENCE, It's a Miracle
• Will Somebody Change Eric Gisse's Nappy?, Tarquin
  • Re: Will Somebody Change Eric Gisse's Nappy?, Eric Gisse
• Pornography, It's a Miracle
• WE reached the wall I think, It's a Miracle
  • Re: WE reached the wall I think, It's a Miracle
    • Re: WE reached the wall I think, It's a Miracle
      • Re: WE reached the wall I think, It's a Miracle
      • Re: WE reached the wall I think, It's a Miracle
• Re: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Admits He Sank Atlantis, It's a Miracle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Admits He Sank Atlantis, It's a Miracle
• alternate science time travel physics, Vahe Pichikian
• First try to understand (visualise) what you are calculating, jt64
  • Re: First try to understand (visualise) what you are calculating, xxein
    • Re: First try to understand (visualise) what you are calculating, Androcles
• Spider from mars, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Spider from mars, It's a Miracle
  • Re: Spider from mars, It's a Miracle
    • Re: Spider from mars, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • Re: Spider from mars, It's a Miracle
    • Re: Spider from mars, Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
  • Re: Spider from mars, It's a Miracle
• Don't leave me now, It's a Miracle
• How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., jt64
  • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., Eric Gisse
    • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., jt64
  • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., jt64
    • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., Eric Gisse
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., jt64
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., Bill Hobba
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., Eric Gisse
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., jt64
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., jt64
  • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., PD
    • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., jt64
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., PD
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., jt64
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., Eric Gisse
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., jt64
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., PD
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., jt64
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., PD
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., Bill Hobba
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox., Eric Gisse