Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:32:27 +0100
vern@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 5, 9:13 am, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:v...@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote innews:1173102832.025976.16980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
<snip>
Dragged aether's are a drag. How does the aether my planet drags with itIt sure did. MMX killed that aether, dead.Unless, of course, the Earth has its own ether system which is Earth-
centered. In that case, the MMX results would be expected.
interact (avoid interacting) with the aether that your space ship drags
with it?
So your implied answer is "Yes," an ether system which is Earth-
centered would explain the MMX results. Whether such a system is
ruled out by observation is a different matter.
It's ruled out by stellar aberration.
Paul
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: vern
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: Androcles
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- References:
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: bz
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: vern
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: bz
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: vern
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- Prev by Date: Re: Deriving space-time interval
- Next by Date: Superman, Superman
- Previous by thread: Re: SR theory is simplistic
- Next by thread: Re: SR theory is simplistic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|