Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: vern@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 6 Mar 2007 05:40:32 -0800
On Mar 5, 4:32 pm, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.ander...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
v...@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<snip>
So your implied answer is "Yes," an ether system which is Earth-
centered would explain the MMX results. Whether such a system is
ruled out by observation is a different matter.
It's ruled out by stellar aberration.
Just saying that's so, doesn't make it true. There have been many
debates in this forum and elsewhere about whether an Earth-centered
ether can account for aberration. For the latest, check out the NPA
forum at yahoogroups.
Vern
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- References:
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: bz
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: vern
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: bz
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: vern
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR theory is simplistic
- Prev by Date: Re: Comics: the twins paradox in "prof" Subask kak's view
- Next by Date: Re: Synchronization, simultanity, rest spaces and coordinate systems.
- Previous by thread: Re: SR theory is simplistic
- Next by thread: Re: SR theory is simplistic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|