Re: Mystery about "c".

On Mar 10, 3:39 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 7, 12:27 am, "Sue..." <suzysewns...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Mar 6, 2:50 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sue says,

For a fundamental induction force, I can't make
the radiators work beyond what we recognise
as tidal forces.

I'm inclined to agree that you (and me) hit a brick
wall there. Let me turn a bit metaphysical, and
suggest the over-all organization of the universe
is based on love. Evidentally, the universe tends
to organize itself into structures like galaxy's, stars
and then bodies like Earth, that in turn create life.

The basis of that "love" is gravitation, where the
force of attraction over-whelm's the forces of
repulsion, and results in an organized universe,
that can nurture life, as proven by our existance.

Our classical thinking since the 1800's is based
on Coulombs hypothesis as follows,

F = q1 q2 / X^2 , (Coulombs hypothesis)

that indicates, attraction and repulsion are equal
in magnitude.
But the "love" principle above indicates a tweak,
that I find to be,

F = q1 q2 / (X^2 +q1 q2) , (Ken's conjecture).

The modified denominator to Coulombs hypothesis
can be denoted, the "love" factor in Ken's conjecture,
and shows attraction to be stronger than repulsion,
to account for the organization of the universe.

Kouropoulos describes a similar interaction:
<< The correlation is transitive. Its modes form
coherent stationary or propagating states in large
ensembles weighted by their number n- whereas
the anticorrelation self-destructs, as its modes
decrease the collective strength of the overall interaction,
including their own coupling energy to the ensemble.
When the anticorrelated modes reach their maximum
number, which is always less than half the total, the
disordered system has no long-range interaction. >>http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0107015http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/Biza...

...but you might want to contact him to learn if he
had some better name than the "love principle:. LOL

Sue...

Some personal notes on that are here...http://physics.trak4.com/
wherein Ken's conjecture to modify Coulomb is
in accord with "General Relativity applied to a
Charge Couple".

That's a start,
Best Regards
Ken

Hi, Sue, I've been studying this....

Recently I've been focusing on the relation of Power "W_00"
to the time metric g_00.
For instance, I beam a laser vertically, the rate of changes.
(dW_00 = - dg_00) correspond, where the Power of the
laser depends upon Energy/time.
In GR, Energy and time are inversely varied, so that the
Energy is "red shifted" in proportion to frequency, but
the "rate of time" increases, so Power transforms in
the negative proportion to g_00,

W_00 = p_0/x0 = energy/time.

As a service, we might take two equal resistors, both
calibrated to be 1 Ohm. Then we place a current loop
running up a tower and back down with a resistor at
the Hi and Lo in that circuit.
The power output, Power = Voltage x Current can be
measured by the emission of heat and thus photons
from those resistors, at that location.

I find Power W_00 = V_0 I_0 == Voltage x Current.
((I prove that if asked)).

For notation, call g= g_00 , V=V_0, I=I_0, W=W_00,

so that the gravitational field is the derivative dg.

dg = - (dW = I dV + V dI).

Recall dV & dI are based on "complex impedance"
that uses the "j" operator.

Let's now apply the Principle of Equivalence, (PoE).

Does the probability of local inertia depend upon
the "complex impedance"?

I wonder which interpretation of Pound-Snider
Tajmar and de Matos would support. ;-)

"Complex impedance" is a term of art where the
imaginaries are inductive or capacitive and result
from the coupling structure. so the short answer is no.

The imaginaries in QED result from temporal and spatial
application of statistics.

Something Feynman-esque that formally uses
Gaussian disibutions to transfrom between
space and time seems what you are about.
http://www.rp-photonics.com/gaussian_beams.html
Recall that Feynman used classical paths to
determine a probability... not the other way
round.

The term "complex impedance" seems perfectly
happy in its classical world and gravity doesn't
seem to depend on atomic emission/absorption
processes so there is nothing countable for accessing
a temporal domain.

<<Planck's original result involved counting the number
of uncoupled harmonic oscillator modes partaking in
the field's motions in a disordered system averaged
over some random phase f of the oscillators at each
frequency. If instead of non-interacting modes we
have a system with a fixed number of oscillators and
two coupled modes of which one is coherent, the
zero point energy vanishes at first order. This point
has also been stressed by Post. >>
http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/Bizarre/GRAV.htm

The marriage sounds less holy than all Einstein
and Feynman's sins combined. LOL

"Particle in curved space"
<< For a particle in curved space the kinetic term
depends on the position and the above time slicing
cannot be applied, this being a manifestation of the
notorious operator ordering problem in Schrödinger
quantum mechanics. One may, however, solve this
problem by transforming the time-sliced flat-space
path integral to curved space using a multivalued
coordinate transformation (nonholonomic mapping
explained here)... >>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation


I think we don't really know if the frequency change in
Pound-Snider is a conservative inertial effect or
a lossy radiative effect (ignoring Okun's cautions).

That answer may lie in Tate's mass anomaly.

What may look elegant on paper is really the
adoption of quite a house of cards resulting from
several unresolved issues. Don't some of these
ambiguites need to be resolved before making
extrapolations on the scale you propose?

Regards,
Sue...


Best Regards
Ken S. Tucker- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


.

Relevant Pages

  • 13 things that do not make sense
    ... The horizon problem ... Dark matter ... Maybe output from parallel brane universe?; ... thing called conscious energy that regular biochemistry ...
    (sci.physics)
  • =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Schr=F6dinger=27s_Universe?=
    ... Wolff's brand new book: Schrödinger's Universe. ... all electrons give and receive tiny bits ... But both the positron's scalar and spin frequencies are 180 degrees ... quanta bits, the same as energy. ...
    (sci.edu)
  • Re: The Universes Next Door
    ... >also a dark energy exotic vacuum blob that is more stable than ... >Vilenken's thin vacuum domain wall. ... The topology is generally mutiply connected with Betti numbers ... This is familiar in GR where the universe recedes ...
    (sci.math)
  • GRAVITATION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS
    ... PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY ... A planet or any mass such as the earth orbits the sun ... The potential energy of the rest of the universe ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE
    ... radius L to conserve total energy. ... fundamental equation of the universe. ... relative to the rest of the effective universe and potential ... A force of gravity would not be possible without ...
    (sci.physics)