Re: LIGO.

On Feb 25, 6:41 pm, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <d...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Because it is the result of the same theory / model. Because it
also is directly unobservable. Because it has the same
"symptoms"... the image of objects crossing it are infinitely
redshifted and trapped there forever.

Doesn't change the expectation that we will never encounter those
objects again, even in infinite time.

Yet you strain at black holes, and whine that we have never
observed an event horizon... the sole unobservable of a BH.

I do not have problems with stuff is not verified. I simply do not
take as scientific stuff has been not verified, somewhat as I do not
call theories to hypotesis not I use the word "facts" for denoting
conjectures...

None BH has been discovered, only "candidates to BH" are on the
catalog; that is science (real science) can say.

.