I have already implemented the specific relativity



According to the theory of the specific relativity, the object moving
with the speed of the light, will be compressed and will be changed
into the energy at the end of the way. But we can't accept that this
energy is more intense than the primary object. And since we know that
energy is less intense than the primary object, the object should be
stretched. But in the famous experiment concerning proving the
specific relativity, we observed that the cover of the missile was
compress about 1/10,000,000mm!
Is there any contradiction?

From my point of view, we can explain that the object compresses as
it's speed increases from zero to a certain point. While the object is
stretched as it's speed increases from that certain point to the speed
of light. And at the end of the way the object is changed into the
energy.
I have already delivered two concepts concerning the speed of the
moving objects as well as a graph concerning the intensity of the
moving objects; meanwhile, I have come up with an analysis concerning
the intensity of the moving objects.

.



Relevant Pages

  • I have already implemented the specific relativity
    ... According to the theory of the specific relativity, the object moving ... energy is more intense than the primary object. ... compress about 1/10,000,000mm! ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: .Re: Why all the fascination with E = mc^2 ??
    ... >Which tells us how much the energy of the body CHANGES. ... >>H is the light energy of the body measured from the moving frame. ... >to the stationary frame is equal to the decrease in the kinetic energy ... >paper is based on conservation of energy and the Principle of Relativity. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: .Re: Why all the fascination with E = mc^2 ??
    ... >Which tells us how much the energy of the body CHANGES. ... >>H is the light energy of the body measured from the moving frame. ... >to the stationary frame is equal to the decrease in the kinetic energy ... >paper is based on conservation of energy and the Principle of Relativity. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Energy-2
    ... > which energy flows must be expanding. ... Alan (since nobody else seems to want to be ... And then how does that fit with concepts of relativity. ... any at all relative to equal mass that's moving parallel. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Potential energy in Einsteins 1905 Relativity
    ... relationship from the Principle of Relativity (PoR, ... Jun 30 paper) and the Principle of Energy (PoE, ... I am referring to an historic fact, Einstein use ... inaplicability of potential energy in relativity is that you don't ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)