Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox.

On Mar 22, 6:36 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On 22 Mar 2007 12:47:36 -0700, "gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx" <gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Mar 22, 6:07 pm, "PD" <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 22, 10:56 am, "gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx" <gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 21, 3:14 pm, "PD" <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 21, 6:06 am, "gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx" <gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 21, 7:08 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

Eric Gisse is an idiot.
Did your knee hit you in the chin when it jerked up like that?

hello mr Draper

Nice imaginary choreography, no it didn't hit my chin.

Lucky the knee missed when it jerked up, then.

This brings us
to the obvious question: Why do you ask? Are you going against the
established consensus that Eric is an idiot? Or do you want to sign up
for the club?

I'm just curious how you established the consensus that Eric is an
idiot.
I learn from Eric that a consensus is something you enforce upon the
reader.

You didn't reject the theory. That would have been the decent thing
to do. Thus-apparently you have enough doubt of Eric's sanity to
answer your own question.

What's your sample pool? Does it consist of more than yourself?

Being an idiot is just a point of view. For example Eric would
probably disagree with our new found consensus.

Don't forget: "How to defeat the round trip paradox." was question NR
1

The answer is: You reduce them to apologists.

Then they whine about how quote: "It has no effect on my posting"

Hilarious.

hahahahahaha

Don't bother with this pair of pathetically religious would-be scientists's
whose total intelligent contribution to this newsgroup is nil.

They cannot beat us so they just try to waste our time.

Interestingly, Henri, no one is trying to "beat" you. It's not a
contest, and if it were, you would not be equipped for it. If you
think it is a contest, I wonder what you imagine the prize is.

As for wasting your time, no one has asked you to post your musings
and idle reckonings on a newsgroup. When you do, people are inclined
to ask you questions about it, especially when it appears to make
little sense. It's usually at this point that you say you don't have
the time to answer questions, because you are too busy revolutionizing
physics by posting your musings and idle reckonings on a newsgroup.

PD


"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know
him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
--Jonathan Swift.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 15 tricks pharma companies use to get the right results
    ... >>> If you claim the people who express disagreements with consensus ... >>> reports must be misguided you misunderstand the nature of consensus ... >>> reports and sci.med newsgroups. ... but if you think this newsgroup is meant to backup the ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: How to defeat the roundtrip paradox.
    ... I learn from Eric that a consensus is something you enforce upon the ... whose total intelligent contribution to this newsgroup is nil. ... As usual, when you say something stupid, and someone ... --Jonathan Swift. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Sleeping in Light
    ... the consensus was that the Earth ... Paul Harper has an axe to grind with JMS ... >>American posters to the moderated newsgroup with some sort of zombified ideal ... We agree to recognize this singular truth ...
    (rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated)
  • Re: Ping: Odie Ferrous - Advice if possible
    ... But then what do you care, so long as you get your jollies attacking users of this newsgroup. ... There came a point where I did not feel I could tolerate his bullying any more. ... Much of Usenet runs by consensus. ... It does support those who politely remind off-topic posters and it does support those who point out more appropriate forums. ...
    (uk.adverts.computer)