Re: twins versus quanta collapse


N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) ha scritto:

Dear beda pietanza:

"beda pietanza" <beda-pietanza@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1174744535.872666.268480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
Change whatever is bothering you about photons (and
all other quantum objects) having both wave and
particle natures.

Not this bothers me about QM, but the collapse of
wave function: two entangled photons where the
detection of A determine the outcome of B: this, if
really happens,

It does. It does FTL... and near as we can measure,
instantaneously.


Now we got to the point:

premise:
Along path A a string of entangled photons is detected
indipendently, we register a sequel of outcomes.
After many attempts the statistic fits the wave function
probability distribution as expected.

Along path B a string of entangled photons is detected,
many times, and this, also, fits the expected statistic.
.......

the checking:

Now along path A a sequel of photons is detected and registered;
the sequel of path B, detected afterwards some distance away,
results anchored to the sequel of photons A.

And of course viceversa: if we detect along path B we determine
the outcome of path A.

And this all the times we try.

conclusion:

Our immediate conclusion must be that the sequel of photons A
and the sequel of photons B were generated as such from the
common source.

If you say instead, that is the act of measurement on A that
determine
immediately (and a posteriori) the outcome of B, you exclude that
they were prefixed from the moment of emission, then you have to prove
it.

What is the prove that the linking takes place after the measurement
and not
simply (a priori) from the common source ??????????

I apologize for the redundancy and thanks for the attention.

best regards

beda pietanza

ps. on the spacetime not rilevant we can discuss after we
settle the above question.


then there must be a hidden cause that links the
two since the generation of the two entangled
photons, the detection of one of the two should not
have effect on the other aside to show how the
entanglement has fixed the two from the begin.

I would submit the "hidden cause" is our forgetting the wave
nature of all quantum objects. Because we assume we have
"separated" the two objects, this bizarre behavior springs up.
Spacetime is only a problem for macroscopic systems... quantum
objects don't care for / about spacetime. "Separation" is just
us measuring ourselves again, beda.

David A. Smith

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: twins versus quanta collapse
    ... Along path A a string of entangled photons is detected ... we register a sequel of outcomes. ... the detection of one of the two should not ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Quantum Illumination
    ... unentangled photons (think radar). ... get the most benefit from using entangled photons the entanglement ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)
  • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?
    ... a "clean source" of entangled photons. ... The measurement on the idler so-to-say ... If you want to measure the two-photon interference, ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Delayed choice experiment and interstellar signalling
    ... Those photons ... create an interference pattern that looks like particles, not waves, ... In the delayed choice quantum erasure experiment they're using spontaneous parametric down conversion to create the entangled photons, so the phase of the incoming photons is lost. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Photons orr special relativity
    ... Interestingly, I derive them straight from Maxwell, with SR not ... No relation to QED virtual photons at all. ... Like all electromagnetic particles in physical reality. ... is in fact the interaction of quantum objects that would give us the ...
    (sci.physics)