Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:08:12 +1000
"beda pietanza" <beda-pietanza@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1174939618.434774.270320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c)The collapse of the wave function a) is istantly transferred to the
other particle/photon.
Just checking .. by 'instantly' due you mean at the same time, and if so, in
which frame of reference? And does that then mean in other frames of
reference they will be non-simultaneous and so the effect can end up
preceding the cause?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- From: beda pietanza
- Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- References:
- twins versus quanta collapse
- From: beda pietanza
- Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- From: beda pietanza
- Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- From: beda pietanza
- Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- From: beda pietanza
- Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- From: beda pietanza
- twins versus quanta collapse
- Prev by Date: Re: transformation equations
- Next by Date: Re: Velocity
- Previous by thread: Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- Next by thread: Re: twins versus quanta collapse
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|