Re: On the GP-B & LIGO

On Mar 26, 6:06 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 26, 10:40 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Mar 25, 9:34 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 25, 4:54 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Mr. Tucker says,
In these articles,http://physics.trak4.com
supports a modified GR,
even if the results of GP-b
and LIGO null.

GR (IMHO) is an exceptionally powerful theory.
I believe the calculations rendering frame dragging
and gravitational radiation may have resulted from
poorly applied erroreous appications of tensor
analysis.

...and how are you qualified to make such a statement?

What's that saying, *a fella doesn't need to be
chicken to smell a bad egg*. The calculations
are published, it's not a govmonk matter.

Those who do not understand the mathematics are unqualified to judge
said mathematics.

Returning to the question I asked, who do you
think understands mathematics?
Do you ?

I find theoretical physicists lack the necessary
discipline to apply tensor analysis, overall.

*laughs*

Sound out that word, *La - you - ga - ha ' s*, is a laff.
No wonder spelin' is a PITA.

This coming from the guy who thinks gravitational radiation is
actually electromagnetic radiation.

Don't matter what I think, it's scientifically responsible
to present a solution. We have the right to express
energy in terms of charge configurations, and then
from that solve the EFE's. E=mc2 and the PoE do
not discriminate on the nature of matter, so in GR
you have the right use the geometry of charge
configurations to define mass and energy. Using that
definition it appears - on superficial examination - that
g-waves and EM waves are the same thing.

Yes, SUPERFICIAL examination. Just because it obeys a wave equation
does _not_ mean it is electromagnetic. In the Lorentz gauge for E&M
both the vector potential and scalar potentials obey exactly the wave
equation when J = rho = 0 - does that mean both are EMR?

Do you mean the derivatives?

Go back to your GR textbooks and carefully notice that gravitational
waves are obtained with NO MENTION IN ANY WAY of electromagnetism.
Then remember that spacetime can be nice and dynamical, and draw the
obvious conclusion.

We have a problem, can you confirm g-waves
are in accord with PoE?

Lacking a Quantum Gravitational Field Theory I can
reference too, I'll presume relativity is correct and
apply it's accepted principles.

Might want to reconsider how you are applying relativity if you are
getting something stupidly wrong.

Agreed, I think we could right a book on testing that,
however, do you object to trusting experimental
physicists?

There's only a few fucking guys on the whole
planet who understand tensor analysis applied
to GR, let's see who they are.
Regards

Not you?

Not likely, though I aspire to be, but the fans of GR
can spot a good player, just as baseball fans can
spot a good baseball player without actually being
pro ball players, age is working against me, wish
I could live to be 200 with an equivalent IQ!

What about you Eric, what are your aspirations?

BTW Eric, I've been thinking about writing a fresh sim
program on that binary BH-hole problem you introduced,
(I'm never satisfied with the last one).

Have fun with that. You are doubly at a disadvantage - your
understanding of relativity is poor and implementing relativity via
computer is a pain in the balls.

Eric, did you cop out? No one said the universe is
simple, oh well, another one shot before he even left
the trench, HERE REST's IN PIECE's, Eric the slow,
likeable, but not too bright. His cause of death is
written as "ball pain".

That may be important if I use the EFE EM-solution
sim'd to provide a spectral signature of EMR in place
of g-waves.

Gee..

EMR is generated by a moving charge dipole [among other things, but
dipole is the lowest order pole] - gravitational radiation is
generated by moving quadrupole and higher moments.

Off to a bad start when you can't even get the lowest generating
moments to agree.

I'm working on that!

What do think a huge amount of very long wave
emitted radiation would look like?

What detection gear would be required to receive
EMR in Light Year wavelengths?

Can we rule out the possibility that the universe
is flooded with 1 LY wavelength radiation?

Of course not.

It just isn't relevant - calculate the energy density of such a wave.

:-)

If not, is that source of power?

Best Regards and Cheers
Ken S. Tucker


.