Re: On the GP-B & LIGO

On Mar 27, 4:53 pm, "JanPB" <film...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 25, 5:54 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
....
There's only a few fucking guys on the whole
planet who understand tensor analysis applied
to GR, let's see who they are.

Oh dear. Let me guess: you have finally managed to understand
something of tensor analysis and you now assume that everyone else is
in the same boat: just barely holding onto some understanding.

That's about the size of it.

Let's do simple math.
Let an electrostatic potential be q/r.
In continuum theory d/dr (q/r) is an
E-field, (single source particle).
What is /\q//\r ? (incremental variations).
What is d/dr (/\q//\r)?
What is /\//\r (/\q//\r)?
The "/\" is a quantum requirement.

Next care to solve the above in a generally
covariant format?

Do you Jan or anyone else know how to
solve that "simple" problem?
Moving the above incrementals into a
General Covariant form is equivalent to creating
a Quantized Tensor Analysis, (QTA).

What logic power is derived from QTA?

Maybe if the buck is your quantum, you'd
make Bill Gates look like a peasant.
Regards
Ken

.