Re: Neophyte question.
- From: "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:32:35 GMT
"harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotThis@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1175263865_334@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dave Reckoning" <John@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VfOdnXnMUehf85HbnZ2dnUVZ_s-rnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <dlzc@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:xtZOh.84751$ZA5.22863@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Dave Reckoning:
"Dave Reckoning" <John@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5ZmdnVAvweqGzpHbnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
Am I correct in assuming that if the rock-string
configuration were the sum total of the universe
that it could still manage to "spin" relitive to itself and therefore
cause tension in the string?
Ernst Mach did not think so. If the total mass of the Universe were two
rocks and string, whatever configuration the total was in would be
"inertial", and variations from this would be "non-inertial".
David A. Smith
Mr. Smith, thanks for the great reference, that helped define the problem
much better.
Are there those who would disagree with Mach?
Yes, Einstein. I already gave you the reference.
Your dog, this "Einstein" character, is it?
.
- References:
- Neophyte question.
- From: Dave Reckoning
- Re: Neophyte question.
- From: Androcles
- Re: Neophyte question.
- From: Dave Reckoning
- Re: Neophyte question.
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Neophyte question.
- From: Dave Reckoning
- Re: Neophyte question.
- From: harry
- Neophyte question.
- Prev by Date: Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
- Next by Date: Re: question about FTL equation
- Previous by thread: Re: Neophyte question.
- Next by thread: Re: Neophyte question.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|