sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: jamesahart79
• Photon Structure.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: xhacker
• Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: bz
• Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: einstein started a joke, QT continues it
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proof of infinity. (to those who argue this fact)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Equivalence demo
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: xhacker
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: bz
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: bz
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: bz
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: bz
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: xhacker
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: PD
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: xhacker
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Would this invalidate General Relativity?
  • From: xhacker
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Einstein's Photoelectric = Newton Mechanics??
  • From: bz
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: Igor
• Re: Proof of infinity. (to those who argue this fact)
  • From: PD
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Neutrinos & Antineutrinos
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: einstein started a joke, QT continues it
  • From: PD
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: Igor
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Einstein's Photoelectric = Newton Mechanics??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof of infinity. (to those who argue this fact)
  • From: Alen
• Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync .
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: harry
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: bz
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: ca314159
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Einsteinhoax
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Photoelectric = Newton Mechanics??
  • From: bz
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Barry
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: bz
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: bz
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: bz
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: What was the main difficulty that faced Einstein when he tried to unify GR with electromagnetism ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Physics is like Pinocchio
  • From: Y
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Neutrinos & Antineutrinos
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics is like Pinocchio
  • From: Y
• Re: Physics is like Pinocchio
  • From: Jeckyl
• Physics is like Pinocchio
  • From: Y
• Re: New lower limit set for Newton's law
  • From: anandsr21
• Re: ABOUT THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: Y
• video lectures and animations on Physics
  • From: AK444
• Re: Proof of infinity. (to those who argue this fact)
  • From: Y
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: ABOUT THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: Stamenin
• Einstein's Photoelectric = Newton Mechanics??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mass created the last 2 dimensions
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Mass created the last 2 dimensions
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jerry
• New lower limit set for Newton's law
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Proof of infinity. (to those who argue this fact)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Proof of infinity. (to those who argue this fact)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Quantum concept of proper time and general relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: einstein started a joke, QT continues it
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: einstein started a joke, QT continues it
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• einstein started a joke, QT continues it
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: bz
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Neutrinos & Antineutrinos
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: Igor
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: bz
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravito magnetism and the jet phenomena and the dark matter problem, and Gravity probe B
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: JanPB
• Quantum concept of proper time and general relativity
  • From: PS
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: PD
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: bz
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proof of infinity. (to those who argue this fact)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: Randy Poe
• Gravito magnetism and the jet phenomena and the dark matter problem, and Gravity probe B
  • From: Supertech
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: socratus
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: bz
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Proof of infinity. (to those who argue this fact)
  • From: Y
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: Y
• Re: Law of Attraction 'The Secret' afraid of a moral philosophy ?
  • From: Y
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Proof of infinity. (to those who argue this fact)
  • From: Y
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: Y
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: ca314159
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: Y
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: Sue...
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Uoy
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Eric Gisse says Rest Mass is NOT invariant!!!
  • From: genuine advantage
• Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
  • From: genuine advantage
• Re: why light speed is constant
  • From: genuine advantage
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: genuine advantage
• Re: Law of Attraction 'The Secret' afraid of a moral philosophy ?
  • From: genuine advantage
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Neutrinos & Antineutrinos
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: EMF in space
  • From: dongle
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: dongle
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: bz
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: ABOUT THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: maxwell
• EMF in space
  • From: Y
• Re: Law of Attraction 'The Secret' afraid of a moral philosophy ?
  • From: Y
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: Stamenin
• ABOUT THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: GSS
• Re: ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: bz
• ABOUT THE TIDES
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Bohr's Atom still number one
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: ca314159
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: bz
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why light speed is constant
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Eric Gisse says Rest Mass is NOT invariant!!!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM AUTHORITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Law of Attraction 'The Secret' afraid of a moral philosophy ?
  • From: dongle
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 100 Years of Inquisition in Physics is Now Over!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why light speed is constant
  • From: dongle
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: ca314159
• Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• why light speed is constant
  • From: dongle
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: dongle
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: dongle
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: 100 Years of Inquisition in Physics is Now Over!
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Uoy
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Law of Attraction 'The Secret' afraid of a moral philosophy ?
  • From: Y
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Law of Attraction 'The Secret' afraid of a moral philosophy ?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: bz
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: dongle
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: dongle
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• 100 Years of Inquisition in Physics is Now Over!
  • From: hopar
• how matter knows which action is least?
  • From: dongle
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: nuts
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: nuts
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: nuts
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: nuts
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: anod
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: anod
• Law of Attraction 'The Secret' afraid of a moral philosophy ?
  • From: Y
• Twin Paradox & Quantum Theory
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
  • From: anod
• interactivity of EM
  • From: anod
• Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM AUTHORITY
  • From: kanuk
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: kanuk
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: ca314159
• Re: What Was The Main Difficulty Einstein Faced When He Tried To Unify GR With Particle Theory?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: bz
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Sam Wormley is as transparent as glass
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: ca314159
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Tom Roberts
• DIY Emission Theory v1.0 Primer
  • From: ca314159
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: OG
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: bz
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: bz
• Re: What Was The Main Difficulty Einstein Faced When He Tried To Unify GR With Particle Theory?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Light speed in emission theory
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Light speed in emission theory
  • From: kanuk
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: Dean D
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What Was The Main Difficulty Einstein Faced When He Tried To Unify GR With Particle Theory?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: ca314159
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Zeno's TOE and Y's Range of Realisation.
  • From: Y
• Re: What Was The Main Difficulty Einstein Faced When He Tried To Unify GR With Particle Theory?
  • From: Y
• Zeno's TOE and Y's Range of Realisation.
  • From: Y
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Zeno's TOE and Y's Range of Realisation.
  • From: Y
• What Was The Main Difficulty Einstein Faced When He Tried To Unify GR With Particle Theory?
  • From: sdrodrian
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: bz
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: bz
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: bz
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Zeno's TOE and Y's Range of Realisation.
  • From: Y
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uoy
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync .
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Wolfgang G. Gasser
• Re: Eric Gisse says Rest Mass is NOT invariant!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jerry
• Re: HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: Androcles
• HELP! - Constant acceleration in SR and event horizon
  • From: Dean D
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: harry
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Alert: 50% S/N ratio on s.p.r.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Alert: 50% S/N ratio on s.p.r.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: ca314159
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Alert: 50% S/N ratio on s.p.r.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: ca314159
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: PD
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM AUTHORITY
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM AUTHORITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM AUTHORITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Igor
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: kanuk
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Evidence against emission theories
  • From: ca314159
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: ca314159
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: maxwell
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: BernardZ
• Evidence against emission theories
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Surfer
• Fucking Hell! It's Three O'Clock!!
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Space Elevator Hammer/Fox
  • From: Y
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: bz
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: socratus
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: bz
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: bz
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: ca314159
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: bz
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Alert: 50% S/N ratio on s.p.r.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: kanuk
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: kanuk
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Surfer
• Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM AUTHORITY
  • From: kanuk
• Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM AUTHORITY
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM AUTHORITY
  • From: kanuk
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: kanuk
• Re: Mass formed the final two dimensions
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Alert: 50% S/N ratio on s.p.r.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What do they mean by spinors have 2 components?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM AUTHORITY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• This is confusing - can someone explain?
  • From: hjsb85
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM AUTHORITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: kanuk
• Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT FROM AUTHORITY
  • From: kanuk
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: Uoy
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Space Elevator Hammer/Fox
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Space Elevator Hammer/Fox
  • From: Y
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Please cure a little bit of my stupidity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Surfer
• LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Photos of Space
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: JanPB
• Alert: 50% S/N ratio on s.p.r.
  • From: Sciodonk
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Please cure a little bit of my stupidity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Please cure a little bit of my stupidity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: bz
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: PD
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: bz
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: bz
• Re: Please cure a little bit of my stupidity
  • From: PD
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: socratus
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Mass formed the final two dimensions
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Eric Gisse says Rest Mass is NOT invariant!!!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cosmic Relativity--Implications and Experimental Tests
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Please cure a little bit of my stupidity
  • From: Faye Kane
• V^2 = V1 x V2 anyone know his geometry??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Tom Roberts denies muon's life = time to decay?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Please cure a little bit of my stupidity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: hydrogen magnet
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photos of Space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Please cure a little bit of my stupidity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Photos of Space
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Photos of Space
  • From: chalkyster
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: bz
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Please cure a little bit of my stupidity
  • From: bz
• Re: A Muon's Life?
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: bz
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Please cure a little bit of my stupidity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Please cure a little bit of my stupidity
  • From: Faye Kane
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einsteins Brain
  • From: Y
• Einsteins Brain
  • From: Y
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: hydrogen magnet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: hydrogen magnet
  • From: Andrea Croci
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: hydrogen magnet
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Neutrinos & Antineutrinos
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What do they mean by spinors have 2 components?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Muon's Life?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• Re: Cosmic Relativity--Implications and Experimental Tests
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Cosmic Relativity--Implications and Experimental Tests
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: jem
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: Y
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: socratus
• Re: quantum physics inconsistency
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Cosmic Relativity--Implications and Experimental Tests
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Cosmic Relativity--Implications and Experimental Tests
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: bz
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Max Planck.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: maxwell
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: bz
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Igor
• Re: How does a slowed single photon accelerate to "c"?
  • From: Igor
• quantum physics inconsistency
  • From: catod
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: OxFF
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: Igor
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: OxFF
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Muon's Life?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: OxFF
• Photon m, v, F, E, p, c, a Proportional or not ?
  • From: Y
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: bz
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: maxwell
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Gisse's on Fire over Temperature
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Juan R.
• Big Bertha Thing Faculty
  • From: Tony Lance
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: jem
• Max Planck.
  • From: socratus
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: OxFF
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: OxFF
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: OxFF
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: OxFF
• Re: what is matter, what is mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what is matter, what is mass
  • From: OxFF
• Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync .
  • From: Eric Gisse
• what is matter, what is mass
  • From: OxFF
• who tell matter to interact?
  • From: OxFF
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: bz
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Gisse's on Fire over Temperature
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Gisse's on Fire over Temperature
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Gisse's on Fire over Temperature
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Universal Gravitational Time Dilation is REAL!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: Igor
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: can electricity predict levitation?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does a slowed single photon accelerate to "c"?
  • From: bz
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: maxwell
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Gisse's Wisdom beyon Maxwell's lightspeed
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: bz
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: How does a slowed single photon accelerate to "c"?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does a slowed single photon accelerate to "c"?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: bz
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: David
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Eric & Igor meet Dr. Frank_Einstein
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Dlac
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Y
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Perhaps here's Secret of Quantum Mechanics?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: bz
• Re: How does a slowed single photon accelerate to "c"?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What's with that Photon?
  • From: bz
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Precession of Orbiting Bodies due to a Reduction in Internal Cyclical Process
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Maxwell/Einstein's Relativity is caused by Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Igor
• Re: How does a slowed single photon accelerate to "c"?
  • From: bz
• Re: How does a slowed single photon accelerate to "c"?
  • From: bz
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: bz
• Re: can electricity predict levitation?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does a slowed single photon accelerate to "c"?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: socratus
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The War on the Lightspeed's Vacuum?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: bz
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How does a slowed single photon accelerate to "c"?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: bz
• Eric Gisse now "INSISTS" he knows his Tensors!!@!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: John Kennaugh
• "Gravity"
  • From: Dlac
• How does a slowed single photon accelerate to "c"?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: duc de Broglie
• What causes light to accelerate after refraction?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: harry
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Y
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Just an ignorant thought
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Y
• Re: hydrogen magnet
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Maple and Exams
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Yakov
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Jeckyl
• Photon, Momentum, Mass
  • From: Y
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Maxwell/Einstein's Relativity is caused by Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Maple and Exams
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Maxwell/Einstein's Relativity is caused by Uncertainty Principle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Maxwell/Einstein's Relativity is caused by Uncertainty Principle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: what is a nebula
  • From: Androcles
• Re: can electricity predict levitation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Electrons emit photons, why not slit experiment???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Neutrinos & Antineutrinos
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Androcles
• What's with that Photon?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• What do they mean by spinors have 2 components?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: the tidals debunked
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Y
• Re: Perhaps here's Secret of Quantum Mechanics?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Y
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Y
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Y
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Y
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Y
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Y
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: PD
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Y
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Y
• Re: Weird. . .
  • From: Y
• Weird. . .
  • From: Y
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: Igor
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Igor
• Re: One brief thought.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: can electricity predict levitation?
  • From: Igor
• Just an ignorant thought
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Maxwell/Einstein's Relativity is caused by Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Igor
• Re: How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
  • From: Igor
• Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM .
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• One brief thought.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Maxwell/Einstein's Relativity is caused by Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Perhaps here's Secret of Quantum Mechanics?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Perhaps here's Secret of Quantum Mechanics?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Maxwell/Einstein's Relativity is caused by Uncertainty Principle
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
  • From: socratus
• MOND, a result of curvature of universe?
  • From: anandsr21
• Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM .
  • From: Sue...
• Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM .
  • From: cliff wright
• Re: curved space or gravitons?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: curved space or gravitons?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: curved space or gravitons?
  • From: PD
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: curved space or gravitons?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Explanation sought. Idiots need not apply.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Uncovered Secret of permitivity and Magnetism
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the tidals debunked
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: the tidals debunked
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: the tidals debunked
  • From: xxein
• Re: Explanation sought. Idiots need not apply.
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: can electricity predict levitation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: can electricity predict levitation?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• What happeens when an Electron moves at 300 times the speed of light?
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• Uncovered Secret of permitivity and Magnetism
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The War on the Lightspeed's Vacuum?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: bz
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The War on the Lightspeed's Vacuum?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The War on the Lightspeed's Vacuum?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The War on the Lightspeed's Vacuum?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: invisible matter in space
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Dlac
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Yanick Toutain
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync .
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Bending Spacetime in the Basement
  • From: Gloo
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: jem
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: jem
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: Sue...
• Twin's paradox problem
  • From: David
• Re: Twin's paradox problem
  • From: David
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Twin's paradox problem
  • From: David
• Re: polarizer filters selectivity
  • From: Sue...
• polarizer filters selectivity
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Eric Gisse knows his Tensors!!!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: particalization
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: particalization
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: invisible matter in space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: invisible matter in space
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: curved space or gravitons?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: particalization
  • From: dlzc
• Re: life at qm level
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: curved space or gravitons?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: curved space or gravitons?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: life at qm level
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: The War on the Lightspeed's Vacuum?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The War on the Lightspeed's Vacuum?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The War on the Lightspeed's Vacuum?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The War on the Lightspeed's Vacuum?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: PD
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Dlac
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: jem
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The War on the Lightspeed's Vacuum?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Shubee
• The War on the Lightspeed's Vacuum?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: G
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
  • From: socratus
• JOB: Mathematician/contractor
  • From: audio.magician@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: JanPB
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Welcome to Dipole Gravity blog
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: particalization
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Article: A new way to test general relativity
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: G
• Article: Einstein was right, probe shows
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: particalization
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: O'Barr Instructions to Seto.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: particalization
  • From: OG
• particalization
  • From: carbon dioxide
• Re: religion is science
  • From: carbon dioxide
• Re: FREE Theory of Physics - sonnet & theory
  • From: Androcles
• FREE Theory of Physics - sonnet & theory
  • From: relativitybeyondeinstein
• Re: O'Barr Instructions to Seto.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr Instructions to Seto.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: JanPB
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: OG
• Re: How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Igor
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Igor
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: JanPB
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Androcles Caught Kissing TWIN Sisters Paradox
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Androcles Caught Kissing TWIN Sisters Paradox
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: PD
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Big Crunch's Thermodynamics law may have slowed down Time?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: jem
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Dlac
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: jem
• Perhaps Time should be the 1st vector (1st dimension) not the 4th?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: bz
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: harry
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Welcome to Dipole Gravity blog
  • From: Supertech
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Bilge
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: bz
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• ABOUT THE COVARIANCE OF THE GENERAL LAWS OF THE NATURE
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Trajectory
  • From: Jeckyl
• Trajectory
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: YBM
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A Muon's Life?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Sue...
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: religion is science
  • From: Igor
• Re: O'Barr Instructions to Seto.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Muon's Life?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: OG
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: OG
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr Instructions to Seto.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• New question about Longitudinal sound waves?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: O'Barr Instructions to Seto.
  • From: Phil
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: YBM
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: jem
• Re: Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Phil
• Re: O'Barr Instructions to Seto.
  • From: jem
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: jem
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: jem
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: jem
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Shubee
• How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
  • From: socratus
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Androcles
• Threaded shaft length contraction paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: religion is science
  • From: balloon
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: balloon
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• O'Barr Instructions to Seto.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Phil
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: bz
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: YBM
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Phil
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Shubee
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: religion is science
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: yh74h8
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Defying David A Smith's remarks on the Uncertainty Principal
  • From: OG
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: OG
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: End of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle & Einstein's Roll of Dice?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Mike
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Igor
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Defying David A Smith's remarks on the Uncertainty Principal
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Defying David A Smith's remarks on the Uncertainty Principal
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Defying David A Smith's remarks on the Uncertainty Principal
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Defying David A Smith's remarks on the Uncertainty Principal
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Potential energy and relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Defying David A Smith's remarks on the Uncertainty Principal
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Gisse's EM Equilibrium
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Defying David A Smith's remarks on the Uncertainty Principal
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: End of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle & Einstein's Roll of Dice?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: End of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle & Einstein's Roll of Dice?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: End of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle & Einstein's Roll of Dice?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Defying David A Smith's remarks on the Uncertainty Principal
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Llew
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: OG
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: moment of inertia of a cube
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: bz
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: bz
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: OG
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: OG
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Why is a sound wave longitudinal?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: bz
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• This is just a test
  • From: Road Runner
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: End of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle & Einstein's Roll of Dice?
  • From: PD
• Re: End of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle & Einstein's Roll of Dice?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: End of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle & Einstein's Roll of Dice?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: bz
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Llew
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: jem
• Re: How can Relativity's "gamma" equal both 1 and infinity ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: How can Relativity's "gamma" equal both 1 and infinity ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MOND
  • From: anandsr21
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: Bilge
• Re: moment of inertia of a cube
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Bilge
• Re: End of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle & Einstein's Roll of Dice?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: End of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle & Einstein's Roll of Dice?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Bilge
• End of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle & Einstein's Roll of Dice?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: energy of light
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Superconducting Supercolliding Relativistic SuperComputers
  • From: John Anderson
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: vacuum uncertainty
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: vacuum uncertainty
  • From: PD
• Re: Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: PD
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: energy of light
  • From: PD
• Re: moment of inertia of a cube
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: energy of light
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: energy of light
  • From: PD
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How can Relativity's "gamma" equal both 1 and infinity ??
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: How can Relativity's "gamma" equal both 1 and infinity ??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• How can Relativity's "gamma" equal both 1 and infinity ??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Bilge
• Re: if light were electromagnetic
  • From: Igor
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The ABERRATION of TIME can be ****PROVEN****!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Raghar
• Re: The ABERRATION of TIME can be ****PROVEN****!!!
  • From: shalayka
• Patrick Norrington's AMA303 Tensor Field Theory notes, Anyone have them?
  • From: e_erpelding
• Re: if light were electromagnetic
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Visit to see the interesting discussion regarding the theory of Dipole Antigravity in Wikipedia.
  • From: Supertech
• Visit to see the interesting discussion regarding the theory of Dipole Antigravity in Wikipedia.
  • From: Supertech
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• A Muon's Life?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: PD
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The ABERRATION of TIME can be ****PROVEN****!!!
  • From: harry
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• The ABERRATION of TIME can be ****PROVEN****!!!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time Aberration since gravitational red shift = gravitational time dilation.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: harry
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: harry
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Llew
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Time Aberration since gravitational red shift = gravitational time dilation.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: harry
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: harry
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Significance of sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2) = 1 or 2 Relative To [P(B-->A) - P(A-->B)]/[P(A) - P(B)] = 1 and Same With P' is 2
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: This theory of Absolutivity would end Relativity!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This theory of Absolutivity would end Relativity!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Where does this increase in velocity come from?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: This theory of Absolutivity would end Relativity!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Correct me if I'm wrong, but light's behavior...
  • From: Androcles
• Significance of sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2) = 1 or 2 Relative To [P(B-->A) - P(A-->B)]/[P(A) - P(B)] = 1 and Same With P' is 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: This theory of Absolutivity would end Relativity!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: This theory of Absolutivity would end Relativity!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: if light were electromagnetic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Correct me if I'm wrong, but light's behavior...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This theory of Absolutivity would end Relativity!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync .
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: if light were electromagnetic
  • From: Igor
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: Igor
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Igor
• Re: This theory of Absolutivity would end Relativity!
  • From: Igor
• Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync .
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Nimtz faster than police allows - faster than light even in vacuum !
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: Igor
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: atomic transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on method of calculating relativistic precession
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: PD
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Dean D
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Why does this color/light beam model switch location?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is there anything absolute in the following model?
  • From: jem
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: PD
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: jem
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: jem
• Re: Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: Jeckyl
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Llew
• Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: Vacuum , “ideal gas “and particles.
  • From: socratus
• Re: if light were electromagnetic
  • From: Bilge
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Dean D
• Re: Still dont believe FTL - see this links
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: harry
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: harry
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• This theory of Absolutivity would end Relativity!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Correct me if I'm wrong, but light's behavior...
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Eric Gisse is an IDIOT!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: The aberration of Time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Could the highest frequency = velocity of light?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why does this color/light beam model switch location?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: bz
• Re: Question on method of calculating relativistic precession
  • From: Jim Black
• The aberration of Time
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why does this color/light beam model switch location?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Questions on the meaning of a clock second in SR.
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Note: Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: if light were electromagnetic
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Question on method of calculating relativistic precession
  • From: gpu . laplace
• Re: Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Question on method of calculating relativistic precession
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why does this color/light beam model switch location?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: atomic transformation
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• HELP! (4 vectors, minkowski space and wave vector)
  • From: Dean D
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Where is the logic behind Length contraction
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Not Einstein or Lorentz but LARMOR?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: twins preexistent entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Question on method of calculating relativistic precession
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Question on method of calculating relativistic precession
  • From: karandash2000
• Question on method of calculating relativistic precession
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: bz
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Proof positive that General Relativity is a religion
  • From: PD
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: dlzc
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: PD
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Proof positive that General Relativity is a religion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: bz
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: bz
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: PD
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: jem
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Llew
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: H. Marmanis
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: Alen
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Toward A Unified Description Of Dark Energy And Dark Matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Proof positive that General Relativity is a religion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Proof positive that General Relativity is a religion
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: HOW TO PROVE EINSTEIN WRONG
  • From: Androcles
• Re: HOW TO PROVE EINSTEIN WRONG
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: John Park
• Re: atomic discrepancy
  • From: PD
• Re: G(U,V) = DELTA(KRONECKER)(U,V) Relativity GR God is dead
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: G(U,V) = DELTA(KRONECKER)(U,V) Relativity GR God is dead
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: atomic discrepancy
  • From: Y.Porat
• G(U,V) = DELTA(KRONECKER)(U,V) Relativity GR God is dead
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: atomic discrepancy
  • From: PD
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: Igor
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: karandash2000
• Still dont believe FTL - see this links
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: Still dont believe FTL - see this links
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: twins preexistent entanglement
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Why does this color/light beam model switch location?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: Alen
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: dlzc
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: twins preexistent entanglement
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: twins preexistent entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: twins preexistent entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: twins preexistent entanglement
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: jem
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there anything absolute in the following model?
  • From: jem
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: electromagnetic waves
  • From: PD
• Re: twins preexistent entanglement
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Alen
• twins preexistent entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Does light aberration occur all around the source?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Holistic Quantum Relativity Group
  • From: DK Matai
• Holistic Quantum Relativity Group
  • From: DK Matai
• Re: Why does this color/light beam model switch location?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Is there an antigravity force in the universe?
  • From: Supertech
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: first post in NG --blackbody question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Velocity
  • From: xxein
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity time kraft
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: electromagnetic waves
  • From: Hamster
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: atomic discrepancy
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Androcles
• Re: atomic discrepancy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: PD
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: PD
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Voice of Religion.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: electromagnetic waves
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: atomic discrepancy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: electromagnetic waves
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Why does this color/light beam model switch location?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: atomic discrepancy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: electromagnetic waves
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: atomic discrepancy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: atomic discrepancy
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Barry
• Re: Why does this color/light beam model switch location?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: atomic discrepancy
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is there anything absolute in the following model?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is there anything absolute in the following model?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Why does this color/light beam model switch location?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: electromagnetic waves
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Why does this color/light beam model switch location?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Is there anything absolute in the following model?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Barry
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Alen
• Re: first post in NG --blackbody question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: speed of light inconsistency
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is there anything absolute in the following model?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Is there anything absolute in the following model?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Is there anything absolute in the following model?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: relativity time kraft
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is there anything absolute in the following model?
  • From: jem
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: jem
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: jem
• Re: relativity time kraft
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: relativity wrong, fundamental contradiction
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Is there anything absolute in the following model?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Is there anything absolute in the following model?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Vacuum , “ideal gas “and particles.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: first post in NG --blackbody question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• first post in NG --blackbody question
  • From: Faye Kane
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Does light aberration occur all around the source?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Barry
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: bz
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: H. Marmanis
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Voice of Religion.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: opposite, complementary and the "not even wrong" ways of thinking
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: The Voice of Religion.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: opposite, complementary and the "not even wrong" ways of thinking
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• opposite, complementary and the "not even wrong" ways of thinking
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: David
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Voice of Religion.
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Voice of Religion.
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: jem
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: bz
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: jem
• Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
  • From: David
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: jem
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: bz
• Re: The Voice of Religion.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: jt64
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: jt64
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativity - Apollo Moon Mission
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: My Absolute Reference Frame
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: On the light-like interval
  • From: Jeckyl
• On the light-like interval
  • From: Phil
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Draft on Set Theory and Development of Special Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Draft on Set Theory and Development of Special Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Draft on Set Theory and Development of Special Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Draft on Set Theory and Development of Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Draft on Set Theory and Development of Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: PD
• Re: Draft on Set Theory and Development of Special Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Draft on Set Theory and Development of Special Relativity
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• The Voice of Religion.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Draft on Set Theory and Development of Special Relativity
  • From: John Riskamp
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: bz
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: Igor
• Re: My Absolute Reference Frame
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Light Speed
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Light Speed
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: Relativity - Apollo Moon Mission
  • From: dlzc
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: David
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Relativity - Apollo Moon Mission
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: David
• Re: MOND
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: PD
• Relativity - Apollo Moon Mission
  • From: ca314159
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Modern-day religions!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: vern
• Re: MOND
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: jem
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: length contraction difficulty
  • From: jem
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Latot
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: My Absolute Reference Frame
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: My Absolute Reference Frame
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: bz
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Does light aberration occur all around the source?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Surfer
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Surfer
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: bz
• Re: My Absolute Reference Frame
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: My Absolute Reference Frame
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Does light aberration occur all around the source?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• [spam]
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: David
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Modern-day religions!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Modern-day religions!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: xxein
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: bz
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Androcles
• Does light aberration occur all around the source?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Doppler: On which axis does the aberration occur ?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Ether and Higgs Field should be one and the same?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: harry
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: PD
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: bz
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: bz
• Re: SR clock sync problem
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Barry
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: PD
• Re: Modern-day religions!
  • From: karandash2000
• Modern-day religions!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: harry
• Re: Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: bz
• My Absolute Reference Frame
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: shuba
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: bz
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: length contraction difficulty
  • From: David
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• SR clock sync problem
  • From: David
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
  • From: jem
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Latot
• Zero Point Energy and Dirac Equation
  • From: فيزيک
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Episode from the history of physics.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: harry
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: harry
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: harry
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: MOND
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Superconducting Supercolliding Relativistic SuperComputers
  • From: John Anderson
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: John Anderson
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: bz
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: PD
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: PD
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: harry
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• "Gravity"
  • From: Latot
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: harry
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: harry
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Surfer
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: xxein
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: emitted, trasmitted, received photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• what are the limiting situations for entanglement
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: emitted, trasmitted, received photons
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Little April Joke
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Is this a string theory
  • From: jt64
• Superconducting Supercolliding Relativistic SuperComputers
  • From: Cal Meacham
• Re: twins versus quanta collapse
  • From: harry
• Re: MOND
  • From: anandsr21
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: harry
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Our greatest problem!
  • From: karandash2000
• Our greatest problem!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: G
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM .
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM .
  • From: socratus
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: Jeckyl
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Latot
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: jt64
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
  • From: valls
• Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync .
  • From: oriel36
• Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync .
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: About Galileo and the Galilean relativity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: jt64
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: harry
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: jt64
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: jt64
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: harry
• Onions, universes, zero, infinity and one.
  • From: jt64
• Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM .
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: harry
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: About Galileo and the Galilean relativity
  • From: Shaktyai
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: G
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The shrinking reality of relativity, in relativistic velocities
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: SR theory is simplistic
  • From: bz
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: OG
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: An Infinite Universe In An Infinitesimal Point
  • From: jimk
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: Androcles
• Einstein's Relativity Disregards the Doppler Effect?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync .
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync .
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: About Galileo and the Galilean relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: About Galileo and the Galilean relativity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Igor
• Re: How clocks and axial rotation keep in sync .
  • From: oriel36
• Re: emitted, trasmitted, received photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: About Galileo and the Galilean relativity
  • From: Shaktyai
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: About Galileo and the Galilean relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: Sue...
• emitted, trasmitted, received photons
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• double slit memo
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: About Galileo and the Galilean relativity
  • From: Shaktyai
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Little April Joke
  • From: josefmatz
• Re: About Galileo and the Galilean relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: jt64
• About Galileo and the Galilean relativity
  • From: Shaktyai
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: jt64
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Daor
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Einstein elevators thought experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Expanding the gedanken
  • From: jt64
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Expanding the gedanken
  • From: jt64
• Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM .
  • From: socratus
• They say yall be talkin aboute Black Holes
  • From: Eboneesha
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A new SR principle!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The secret of the Twin Paradox exposed
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Frank Naypaver
• A new SR principle!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PLEASE EXCUTE SUSCRIPTION TO RELATIVITY GROUP
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson-Morley
  • From: Raghar
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: Sue...
• Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: PLEASE EXCUTE SUSCRIPTION TO RELATIVITY GROUP
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: PLEASE EXCUTE SUSCRIPTION TO RELATIVITY GROUP
  • From: Sue...
• Re: question about FTL equation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: PLEASE EXCUTE SUSCRIPTION TO RELATIVITY GROUP
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM .
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PLEASE EXCUTE SUSCRIPTION TO RELATIVITY GROUP
  • From: Jeckyl
• PLEASE EXCUTE SUSCRIPTION TO RELATIVITY GROUP
  • From: PEREPAN76
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: LIGO.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: MOND
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM .
  • From: socratus
• Re: MOND
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: one single photon generation
  • From: Sue...