Re: Light Speed
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <dlzc@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 20:19:48 -0700
Dear Jeckyl:
"Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:131e0ckmo030l9b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <dlzc@xxxxxxx> wrote in message....
news:w5DRh.154993$p17.38158@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You can devise no experiment to measure a speed
of light, that is not a TWLS measurement. One way
or another, Nature requires this.
You can look for anisotropy...
Is it not possible to have two distant synchronized
clocks
Synchronization? By what method? If it is by TWLS signalling,
the only light speed measurement you can obtain is TWLS.
in the same FoR, one at an emitter and one at a
receiver, and at a preset time emit a beam of photons and then
record the time at which the
photons arrive at the other end.
It is a classical TWLS setup. Same for any distance-based
measurement, since distance is TWLS established (and little
different than a remote synchronized clock).
What would be make that impossible, or a TWLS
measurement?
All measurements of *speed* are based on distance. All
calibrated distances are TWLS established.
David A. Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Light Speed
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Light Speed
- References:
- Light Speed
- From: maxwell
- Re: Light Speed
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Light Speed
- From: Jeckyl
- Light Speed
- Prev by Date: Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
- Next by Date: Re: Are There Unresolver Foundational Issues With GR
- Previous by thread: Re: Light Speed
- Next by thread: Re: Light Speed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
