Re: LIGO.

"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1175914685.337551.180680
@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:

On Apr 6, 9:55 am, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

Try to remember Juan R's extreme anti-relativity bias. Any viewpoint,
no matter how contrived or stupid, is a viable viewpoint if it
contradicts relativity.

He does not let facts get in the way of a good ol' relativity bashing.

We shall see, from his response [if he bothers to respond to what I wrote],
just how much he cares about seeking the truth. I am willing to give him
the benefit of the doubt, once.

He asked:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
"Juan R." <juanrgonzaleza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1174146412.759227.262560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Finally I would ask to relativists and others, why are so bad-tempered
when someone remember them that BH is a hypothesis still?

[to which I responded]
I suspect that it may have something to do with how the reminder is given.

Did you say that BH is an unproven hypothesis because no hypothesis can
ever be proven, so that, at best, we can only say that phenomina have been
observed that are consistent with BH?

Or did you just challenge them to prove the existance of BH, saying that
they don't exist???

Finally, the use of the term 'relativists' shows a possible bias upon your
part. Could you be trolling?
---------------------------------------------------------------------

In his most recent posting he said:

My criticism was clear and precise; it was
against people who claim that black holes are _real_ or were already
_found_ when evidence for both statements is exactly zero.

If he studies my response[repeated below] to that statement, perhaps he
will see, in the mirror of my words, a clear indication of his apparent
bias, to which others have been seeing and responding.

[I responded]
You were, as you just said, attacking the PEOPLE, not their statements.
That is why you got the reactions you got.

There is a LOT of evidence for the existance of black holes and that they
have been found, just no unambiguous evidence.
[end quote]

We shall see just how honest his question about 'why the bad-temper' really
was by how he reacts to my previous posting and to this one.

Can he be honest with him self?


--
bz

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.

bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.

Quantcast