Re: On the light-like interval

On Apr 7, 8:00 am, "Phil" <cms...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 7, 7:52 am, karandash2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Apr 6, 11:08 pm, "Phil" <cms...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

What you wrote can be seen recordeded in this thread. You are not only
a cretin, you are the weaseling type.So, you got nailed. Who lets out
THINGS like you at night?

About all I can say about you is that you are a name-caller and a
coward. So what did I nailed on? Responding so quickly I called the
square of space-time interval a space-time interval. Please. If you
know so much, why don't you correct what you think is wrong? THE FACT
IS, you don't even know what you think is wrong about it. Which is
why, nothing you say has content, it is merely ad-hominem.

Have a look at you post 19, weaseling imbecile:

19. Phil View profile
(1 user) More options Apr 6, 10:59 pm

Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: "Phil" <cms...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 6 Apr 2007 22:59:00 -0700
Subject: Re: On the light-like interval

You are joking, right?

I beg to differ. You can't have (cdt)^2-(dx^2+dy^2+dz^2)=0 WITHOUT


(cdt)^2 = (dx^2+dy^2+dz^2)


NEITHER has to equal zero.

.