Re: Light Speed
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 08:29:25 +1000
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <dlzc@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:asORh.122378$115.24688@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Jeckyl:
You build a castle of sand. "appropriate positions", "same, but opposite
motion" establishes TWLS distance
How
... because otherwise how do you know where it
moved to is "appropriate", and how do you know they moved there in the
same way? Telepathy, telekinesis?
You use two vehicles that move with the smae properties in opp directions
for a fixed distance
in the same FoR, one at an emitter and one at a
receiver, and at a preset time emit a beam of
photons and then record the time at which the
photons arrive at the other end.
It is a classical TWLS setup.
How can that be two way .. it is only measuring from
the emitter to the receiver .. ther eis no two-way
measurement there.
"Distance" is such a measurement. And can be done *no other way*.
Same for any distance-based measurement, since
distance is TWLS established (and little different
than a remote synchronized clock).
eh?
How is the length of a rod established? Look into metrology. Start here
for terms:
http://nvl.nist.gov/pub/nistpubs/jres/104/3/html/j43bee.htm
What would be make that impossible, or a TWLS
measurement?
All measurements of *speed* are based on distance.
All calibrated distances are TWLS established.
I can drive my car a certain distance without the need
for TWLS :)
Actually no. Because you are blind to its need, does not mean it is not
fundamentally present.
Are you saying it is impossible to know the distance
between two locations unless you use TWLS to
calculate it?
You tell me ways you don't think require it. I'll help you find the
TWLS-based method used to calibrate it.
Discount Lunar Laser Ranging right away...
David A. Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Light Speed
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Light Speed
- References:
- Light Speed
- From: maxwell
- Re: Light Speed
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Light Speed
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Light Speed
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Light Speed
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Light Speed
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Light Speed
- Prev by Date: Re: transformation equations
- Next by Date: Re: Nuts and Bolts paradox/contradiction?
- Previous by thread: Re: Light Speed
- Next by thread: Re: Light Speed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
