Re: Episode from the history of physics.

On Apr 9, 3:53 pm, "PD" <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 9, 1:37 pm, v...@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:



When evidence is presented to support one's
position and a contestor cannot re*** the evidence with more credible
evidence, then the contestor should have the honor to concede the
point.

I beg your pardon. I had no idea you were here for sport, for
jousting, for wrestling until someone makes you cry "Uncle". If you
want that, might I suggest rec.foolish.ideas.last.one.standing.wins or
alt.talking.for.the.sake.of.talking.

You have as much as admitted in a previous post that when a medium is
involved, waves and their characteristics are caused by the medium.
However, when I asked you the question point blank, you changed your
tack, saying that the waves were caused by the medium, but not the
wave's characteristics. You have only given a broad reference to a
physics book. I have given you two specific references which evidence
that wave characteristics in a medium are caused by that medium. You
have not refutted that evidence. Therefore, you should either
conceded the point or provide evidence to the contrary. That will be
the basis under with I will have any further discussion with you.

Vern

.

Loading