Re: Our greatest problem!

In sci.physics.relativity, PD
<TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on 10 Apr 2007 08:39:40 -0700
<1176219580.149610.95910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Apr 10, 8:49 am, "kenseto" <kens...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 9, 10:59 am, The Ghost In The Machine



<e...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity, kenseto
<kens...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on 9 Apr 2007 06:21:14 -0700
<1176124874.519427.83...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Apr 7, 4:36 pm, karandash2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Apr 7, 11:22 am, "kenseto" <kens...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snippage]

No my proposal for the modified MMX is: the plane of the arms is
oriented vertically. A fringe shift should be observed when the arms
are rotated. The reason for the predicted shift is that different
heights of the arms (when they are rotated) will yield different
frequencies and thus the predicted fringe shift.

Umm, no. Different frequency does NOT result into a fringe shift.
As usual, your math betrays you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So what does result into a fringe shift.....wavelength or speed of
incoming light? You keep on saying that my math betrays me but I
didn't give any math for the proposed modified MMX.
I show eqautions 15 and 16 for my proposed experiment.

Someone's going to have to explain to me precisely how a
speed increase or decrease without a change in wavelength
will result in a fringe shift when one uses a diffraction grating.

:-)

Hey idiot constant wavelength (or universal wavelength) means that the
detected frequency shift of the incoming is caused by a different
speed of the incoming light which, in turn, means the detection of
absolute motion which, in turn, causes fringe shift.


Unfortunately no. If there is no wavelength change, then there is no
change in deflection in a diffraction grating, period, by the way that
diffraction gratings work.

PD


Indeed. SR predicts a change in wavelength (as measured by e.g. a
diffracting rating). Galilean relativity and AFAICT IRT do not.

--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Error 16: Not enough space on file system to delete file(s)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Our greatest problem!
    ... A fringe shift should be observed when the arms ... The reason for the predicted shift is that different ... frequencies and thus the predicted fringe shift. ... Hey idiot constant wavelength means that the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Our greatest problem!
    ... frequencies and thus the predicted fringe shift. ... speed increase or decrease without a change in wavelength ... will result in a fringe shift when one uses a diffraction grating. ... speed of the incoming light which, in turn, means the detection of ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Our greatest problem!
    ... frequencies and thus the predicted fringe shift. ... Hey idiot constant wavelength means that the ... speed of the incoming light which, in turn, means the detection of ... in Galilean relativity lightspeed is relative to the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Our greatest problem!
    ... Once that wavelength is defined for a specific light ... observer's frame and the grating is used to define a new universal ... As I explaine to you, numerous times, MMX ... claim that the MMX in the same gravitational will detect fringe shift. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Our greatest problem!
    ... Once that wavelength is defined for a specific light ... shift of the of the incoming light is due to the varying speed of the ... observer's frame and the grating is used to define a new universal ... claim that the MMX in the same gravitational will detect fringe shift. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)