Re: Our greatest problem!

On Apr 14, 11:45 am, "kenseto" <kens...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 14, 10:46 am, karandash2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:





On Apr 13, 11:27 am, "kenseto" <kens...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 13, 12:53 pm, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"kenseto" <kens...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1176474777.990893.162020
@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:

Gratings don't measure frequency.

I didn't say they could. Frequency is measured separately.

Chicken should never be eaten with the fingers.
The fingers should always be eaten separately.

Gratings measure wavelength. They are wavelength sensitive devices.
Frequency counters measure frequency.

Hey idiot grating defines wavelength for light sources in the
observer's frame. Once that wavelength is defined for a specific light
source that wavelength is a universal constant. Any detected frequency
shift of the of the incoming light is due to the varying speed of the
incoming light. The incoming light becomes a new llight source in the
observer's frame and the grating is used to define a new universal
wavelength for that new light source.

Dr. Seto

Repeating the same mistake doesn't make it true, it was explained to
you that MMX did not detect (and does not detect) any change in
wavelength OR frequency. As I explaine to you, numerous times, MMX
ATTEMPTS to detect a shift in the interference pattern. An, to date,
it detected NONE.

SIGH...How many times do I have to tell you that I didn't make any
claim that the MMX in the same gravitational will detect fringe shift.
I claimed that if the *PLANE OF THE ARMS* are oriented vertically then
a fringe shift will be observed as the apparatus is rotated.

1. Where is the mathematical proof that permits you to predict this?

2. Since you never ran the experiment you have no physical proof, so
your only chance is to GO TO 1.



This
interpretation agrees with the results of the Pound and Rebka
experiments.


Not really. Pound Rebka is about something else, it is clear that you
do not understand this experiment . You are very weak in experiment
(but strong in logic)





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The genius of the Absolute
    ... >> the actual MMX. ... >> Why would you want to analyse the experiment using a reference frame ... wavelength and frequency, ... and gives the same result as the moving frame ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Our greatest problem!
    ... frequencies and thus the predicted fringe shift. ... speed increase or decrease without a change in wavelength ... will result in a fringe shift when one uses a diffraction grating. ... speed of the incoming light which, in turn, means the detection of ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Our greatest problem!
    ... frequencies and thus the predicted fringe shift. ... Hey idiot constant wavelength means that the ... speed of the incoming light which, in turn, means the detection of ... in Galilean relativity lightspeed is relative to the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Our greatest problem!
    ... frequencies and thus the predicted fringe shift. ... speed increase or decrease without a change in wavelength ... will result in a fringe shift when one uses a diffraction grating. ... speed of the incoming light which, in turn, means the detection of ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Our greatest problem!
    ... Once that wavelength is defined for a specific light ... shift of the of the incoming light is due to the varying speed of the ... observer's frame and the grating is used to define a new universal ... claim that the MMX in the same gravitational will detect fringe shift. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)