Re: Logic behind wave from single electron's double slit experiment ?

On Apr 14, 3:42 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 14, 1:15 pm, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <d...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:





Dear guskz:

<g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1176561460.874834.291610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Apr 12, 10:02 pm, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)"
<d...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dear guskz:

<g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
...
In #2, don't electrons generate an EM field, even
in a vacuum chamber instead of a wire?

Only if they are accelerated, are photons emitted.

I can't believe an electron whom perpetually has a
charge doesn't perpetually have some sort of less
denser field then it, surrounding it?

Charge. Not EM per se. You are so busy using standard words in
non-standard ways, I am hoping to see the difficulties you create
for your self.

Doesn't Maxwell's equations begin with a charge(2D) then this same
equation's deriviatives lead to fields(3d Volume)???

No. Charges and fields can exist in any number of dimensions.

A charge is basically an electric force in one direction, that
direction cannot be gained unless INITIALY the acting party is casting
his web(field) in all directions.

You're confusing causes and effects. A charge generates a field and
can respond to a field. But the field is not the charge.

Gravity(field) is in all directions until a relation between a 2nd
entity(mass) is established which then becomes a Force(charge) between
both parties(both masses) involved?

Why write such tortured descriptions of nature? Masses generate
gravitational fields and respond to gravitational fields, somewhat
analogous to charge and electric fields.

Are they still non-standard ways?

3. If so then could it be its EM field(same as a
light wave) is generating the interference pattern
(using two slits) instead of the electron....or would
that form a much weaker (less intense) pattern
then that of the electron??

Neutrons have no net charge,

Is that a play on words "net"....

No, it means they are comprised of three charged quarks, that net
to zero macroscopic charge. No charge field for you to worry
about.

How about any other possible field around the Neutron (other then
charge)??

Weak hypercharge is an attribute of left handed leptons and quarks as
well as their right handed antiparticles. Strong color is an
additional attribute of quarks. All of these have their corresponding
fields and respond to those fields. So yes, there could be other
fields and there are.


ok but they must have some sort of field surrounding
them during any circumstance (even if it be due to
it's quarks, gluons?)

They have:
- continuous behavior like waves

Could any of those waves be split by the two slits into two replica
waves?

Yes, they are solutions to the wave equations of quantum mechanics in
all of it's different forms. I thought we had this settled already.

- discrete behavior like particles
- mass
- spin
- contents (the quarks).

Mass lets them affect other masses and spacetime.

and form a diffraction pattern based

can't the diffraction be from the Neutron's field...

No, the diffraction comes from the experiment where we enhance /
invoke the continuous nature of everything.

hmmm

FIRSTLY: in the slit experiment not all emitted single
Neutron's pass through the slit some hit the walls and
DO NOT PASS THROUGH

But more pass through two slits, than 2x the number that pass
through 1 slit. Same for n slits.

That seems to be contradicting because I just read that ***MOST*** of
the single emitted neutrons hit the wall instead of going through any
slit, therefore most comprehensibly more would pass through one slit
then two slits.

Since as you say (are you positive??) more pass through 2 slits then
only 1 slit, conclusive logic would prevail that there is "very
little" chance that it wouldn't pass through a slit (yet I just read
"most" neutrons hit the wall and don't pass through any slit).

It all depends on how the experiment is set up.


THERE MUST BE A LAW OF LOGIC, which is if a
neutron doesn't always pass through a slit, how can it
***always*** pass two slits simultaneously....

Simple, the neutron is also continuous.

If it where continuous then it wouldn't be hitting the wall more often
then passing through a slit. Clearly you see something's wrong here,
for your explanation is incorrect?

I don't see anything wrong. What you apparently fail to understand is
that the wave nature of particles dictate a propagating probability
density of where they will be at any given time.


Because you want to ignore this demonstrable fact, doesn't mean
that Nature cares what you want. "It must be one or the other"
carries no weight. The categories you seek to impress don't come
from Nature, they are a contrivance of Man... Man who is the
"contained", not the "container". Perhaps our logic is not big
enough yet?

Does the saying "When the only tool you have is a hammer,
everthing starts to look like a nail" have any similarity, if you
substitute "particle detector" for hammer, and "particle" for
nail?

I think you mean a "wave" for a nail? (photons(hammer) cause electrons
to vibrate = wave and thus emit a NEW EM_field about them?)

Try a Schrodinger (or Dirac) wave. EM waves are photons.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Logic behind wave from single electrons double slit experiment ?
    ... And this electric field is most likely being perturbed as the electron ... is passing through the slit and "perhaps" is what generating the ... charge doesn't perpetually have some sort of less ... light wave) is generating the interference pattern ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Logic behind wave from single electrons double slit experiment ?
    ... charge doesn't perpetually have some sort of less ... through 1 slit. ... I think you mean a "wave" for a nail? ... electron to not always have a field is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: the two slits versus schrodingers cat
    ... probability was defined statistically by a wave function... ... > through which slit the photon went, ... The photosensitive screens works by using the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit E
    ... An aether wave created by the carbon-60 molecule displacing the ... aether as it heads towards the slits. ... interference pattern is affected by the slit material chosen. ... that in the television's CRT the acceleration of the electrons is ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Current through coils
    ... By this I assume you mean a traveling current wave with an RMS value of 1 amp. ... You cannot tell if the measured RMS current is made up of a wave traveling in one direction, or the sum of two waves traveling in opposite directions. ... The points between the next two nodes have a phase of 180 degrees (charge is moving in the opposite direction at all times) with respect to the points between the first two nodes. ... anywhere except at the current nodes, charge is certainly moving back and forth along the conductor, during a cycle. ...
    (rec.radio.amateur.antenna)