Re: Our greatest problem!

On Apr 14, 4:27 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
<e...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity, kenseto
<kens...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on 14 Apr 2007 12:10:09 -0700
<1176577809.746905.256...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:



SIGH...How many times do I have to tell you that I didn't make any
claim that the MMX in the same gravitational will detect fringe shift.
I claimed that if the *PLANE OF THE ARMS* are oriented vertically then
a fringe shift will be observed as the apparatus is rotated.

1. Where is the mathematical proof that permits you to predict this?

Mathematic cannot proof anything.

Maybe not, but from various axioms one can prove that certain systems
are nonsensical.

Every axiom of math is based on specific assumptions. For example
karandash2 claims that matrix multiplication is a fundamental law of
nature. Such claim is based on the bogus assumption that the units of
measurement (clock second and meter length) are universal. We know
that in SR and ether theories such claim is bogus.

For instance, one can assume two entities (call them A
and B), both equipped with light source and sufficient detection
equipment, identically configured.

If one assumes an absolute matrix (e.g., the rigid luminiferous aether),
one can affix A to that matrix, if one likes. However, one has to
in that case show cause for the existence of that matrix, or, failing
that, why that matrix doesn't show up as a 10^-8 variability of certain
observations depending on day of the year, and an about 2.4 * 10^-12
variability depending on time of day (at least, at the equator).

If one does *not* assume an absolute matrix, the observers
are then interchangeable, and the coordinate transform of
(x,t) space from A to B, given the velocity of B relative
to A, has to be identical to the coordinate transform of
(x,t) space from B to A, given the velocity of A relative
to B. Since v_AB = -v_BA, one immediately gets

T_ab(v) = T_ba(-v).

This assumption is wrong. A and B will measure different relative
velocity.

Ken Seto



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Our greatest problem!
    ... claim that the MMX in the same gravitational will detect fringe shift. ... variability depending on time of day ... given the velocity of B relative ... The laws of nature are symmetric: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: MMX Null = Anisotropy = Ether
    ... just do the numbers to obscure the result show that the average ... velocity is not c and thus there should have been an effect as ... He predicted a fringe shift of 1.12 but got ... Peter Riedt ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast